Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress (MIED) in Patients With GERD
Effects of an Online Mindfulness-Based Emotion Intervention on Symptoms and Emotional Distress in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Trial
The goal of this multicenter randomized waitlist-controlled clinical trial is to evaluate whether an online Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Emotional Distress (MIED) can reduce emotional distress and reflux-related symptoms in adults with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD is a common chronic gastrointestinal condition that is frequently accompanied by anxiety, depressive symptoms, stress, and impaired quality of life.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Can online MIED reduce emotional distress in patients with GERD?
Can online MIED reduce reflux-related symptoms and improve reflux-related quality of life?
Are changes in psychological processes, such as distress tolerance, cognitive flexibility, experiential avoidance, emotional behaviors, and life engagement, associated with improvements in emotional distress and reflux symptoms?
Researchers will compare participants receiving online MIED with participants in a waitlist control group receiving usual medical care and health management to determine whether online MIED leads to greater improvement over time.
Participants will:
complete screening and baseline assessments;
be randomly assigned to either the online MIED intervention group or the waitlist control group;
if assigned to the intervention group, complete an 8-week online MIED program with one session per week;
continue necessary usual medical care during the study, while keeping medication use stable when possible;
complete online questionnaires at baseline, during the intervention, after the intervention, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the intervention;
report information on reflux symptoms, emotional distress, quality of life, sleep, stress, resilience, life satisfaction, healthcare use, intervention adherence, and adverse events.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前:Yinan Zhang, PHD Candidate
- 電話番号:8615823339524
- メール:yinanzhang25@stu.pku.edu.cn
研究場所
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100871
- 募集
- Peking University
-
Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100080
- 募集
- Being Haidian Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Yuqing Huang, MMed
- 電話番号:86+13371735630
- メール:huangyuqing555@qq.com
-
Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100088
- 募集
- PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center
-
コンタクト:
- Jimin Wu, MMed
- 電話番号:86+13691300588
- メール:18810647108@163.com
-
-
Gansu
-
Baiyin、Gansu、中国、730913
- 募集
- Baiyin Central Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Junhong Yang, MBBS
- 電話番号:86+13893031337
- メール:13893031337@139.com
-
-
Guangdong
-
Shenzhen、Guangdong、中国、518036
- 募集
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Junping Wang, PhD
- 電話番号:86+13510076860
- メール:wjp2006sz@aliyun.com
-
-
Guizhou
-
Guiyang、Guizhou、中国、550004
- まだ募集していません
- the first affiliated hospital of GuiZhou medical university
-
コンタクト:
- Jie Yang, PhD
- 電話番号:86+18984812272
- メール:458571933@qq.com
-
-
Hebei
-
Xingtai、Hebei、中国、054899
- まだ募集していません
- Center Hospital Qinghe County
-
コンタクト:
- Ruijia Niu
- 電話番号:86+13932929522
- メール:niuruijia@yeah.net
-
Xinle、Hebei、中国、050700
- 募集
- Xinle City Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Lin Wang, MBBS
- 電話番号:86+18931197177
- メール:1261980387@qq.com
-
-
Inner Mongolia
-
Chifeng、Inner Mongolia、中国、024000
- 募集
- Affiliated Houspital of Chifeng University
-
コンタクト:
- Yilei Zhang, MMed
- 電話番号:86+18648117300
- メール:zhangyl1213@sina.com
-
Hohhot、Inner Mongolia、中国、026000
- 募集
- Xilingol League Mongolian Medicine Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Yinghai Yang, MBBS
- 電話番号:86+13947955766
- メール:yyh0479@163.com
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nanjing、Jiangsu、中国、210029
- 募集
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
-
コンタクト:
- Liuqin Jiang, PhD
- 電話番号:86+13951017379
- メール:jiangliuqin@163.com
-
-
Shandong
-
Jinan、Shandong、中国、250022
- 募集
- Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Zhi Wei, PhD
- 電話番号:86+18753110926
- メール:chenjixindyx@126.com
-
Liaocheng、Shandong、中国、252600
- 募集
- the Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng
-
コンタクト:
- Shuliang Li, PhD
- 電話番号:86+15163550161
- メール:lishuliang110@163.com
-
-
Shanghai Municipality
-
Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国、200233
- 募集
- Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Yang Xia, PhD
- 電話番号:86+18930172923
- メール:xiayang9999@sina.cn
-
-
Shanxi
-
Changzhi、Shanxi、中国、046000
- まだ募集していません
- Changzhi People'S Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Caiwen Yan, MBBS
- 電話番号:86+13994613311
- メール:yancw401@sina.com
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria
Participants must meet all of the following criteria:
- Aged 18 to 65 years.
- GERD-Q score of 8 or higher.
- Willingness to maintain a relatively stable usual treatment regimen during the study unless medically indicated changes are required.
- Ability to use a smartphone, computer, or tablet to participate in the online program and complete online questionnaires.
- Willingness to comply with course training and follow-up assessments.
- Ability to understand the study and provide written or electronic informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:
- Alarm symptoms or high suspicion of serious organic disease, including but not limited to progressive dysphagia, hematemesis, melena, unexplained weight loss, anemia, recurrent vomiting, or persistent chest pain without exclusion of cardiovascular risk.
- Current or previous severe esophageal organic disease or gastrointestinal malignancy.
- History of anti-reflux surgery, partial gastrectomy, or other upper gastrointestinal surgery that may substantially affect reflux symptom assessment.
- GERD-Q score greater than 15, or symptoms judged by the study physician to be extremely severe and requiring priority medical evaluation or intensified treatment.
- Current uncontrolled severe mental disorder, such as schizophrenia, manic episode of bipolar disorder, acute severe depressive episode, or severe substance use disorder.
- Current suicide risk, operationalized as a score greater than 1 on item 9 of the PHQ-9.
- Previous systematic participation in MIED, mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, or another structured mindfulness program.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:MIED
The intervention is delivered via the internet and is grounded in the psychopathological diamond model of emotional distress proposed by Liu and colleagues.
The program is supported by a MIED knowledge base, the Mindfulness Study public account, supervision and question-answer records, and official materials from Liu Xinghua and the MIED team.
These resources are integrated into a WeChat self-help mini-program and the MIED Mindfulness Assistant, an artificial intelligence-supported system developed using large language models such as Tencent Hunyuan and DeepSeek R1.
Together, these tools support participants' learning and practice over a continuous 49-day training period.
|
Participants will continue usual GERD treatment and health management during the 49-day observation period.
They will not receive MIED, mindfulness training, or other structured psychological interventions during this period.
Usual care may include medication, lifestyle advice, and necessary follow-up as determined by clinicians.
The waitlist control group will complete assessments at the same time points as the MIED group.
After the 2-year follow-up, participants in the waitlist control group who wish to receive the program will be offered the same MIED course.
The intervention is delivered via the internet and is grounded in the psychopathological diamond model of emotional distress proposed by Liu and colleagues.
The program is supported by a MIED knowledge base, the Mindfulness Study public account, supervision and question-answer records, and official materials from Liu Xinghua and the MIED team.
These resources are integrated into a WeChat self-help mini-program and the MIED Mindfulness Assistant, an artificial intelligence-supported system developed using large language models such as Tencent Hunyuan and DeepSeek R1.
Together, these tools support participants' learning and practice over a continuous 49-day training period.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:WL
Participants in the waitlist control group will continue usual GERD treatment and health management during the 49-day observation period.
They will not receive MIED, mindfulness training, or other structured psychological interventions during this period.
Usual care may include medication, lifestyle advice, and necessary follow-up as determined by clinicians.
The waitlist control group will complete assessments at the same time points as the MIED group.
After the 2-year follow-up, participants in the waitlist control group who wish to receive the program will be offered the same MIED course.
|
Participants will continue usual GERD treatment and health management during the 49-day observation period.
They will not receive MIED, mindfulness training, or other structured psychological interventions during this period.
Usual care may include medication, lifestyle advice, and necessary follow-up as determined by clinicians.
The waitlist control group will complete assessments at the same time points as the MIED group.
After the 2-year follow-up, participants in the waitlist control group who wish to receive the program will be offered the same MIED course.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
GERD-HRQL
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The GERD-HRQL is a self-report questionnaire used to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms on health-related quality of life.
It evaluates symptom burden and the degree to which reflux symptoms affect daily functioning.
Higher scores indicate poorer reflux-related quality of life.
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The OASIS is a 5-item self-report measure designed to assess the frequency and severity of anxiety symptoms, as well as the extent of anxiety-related functional impairment and avoidance, over the past week.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20.
Higher scores indicate greater overall anxiety severity and impairment.
The OASIS has demonstrated good reliability and validity in both clinical and nonclinical samples (Norman et al., 2006).
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The ODSIS is a 5-item self-report measure designed to assess the frequency and severity of depressive symptoms, as well as depression-related functional impairment and avoidance, over the past week.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20.
Higher scores indicate greater overall depression severity and impairment.
The ODSIS has demonstrated good reliability and validity in both clinical and nonclinical samples (Bentley et al., 2014).
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The GERD-Q is a 6-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the frequency and severity of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and to monitor treatment response.
Total scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating more severe reflux-related symptoms.
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Reflux Symptom Index (RSI)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The RSI is a 9-item self-report questionnaire used to assess symptoms related to laryngopharyngeal reflux, including chronic cough, hoarseness, throat clearing, and globus sensation.
Total scores range from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating more severe reflux-related throat symptoms.
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks.
Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"), with total scores ranging from 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity.
The GAD-7 has demonstrated good reliability and validity in both clinical and general populations (Spitzer et al., 2006).
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks.
Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"), with total scores ranging from 0 to 27.
Higher scores indicate greater depression severity.
The PHQ-9 has demonstrated good reliability and validity in both clinical and general populations (Kroenke et al., 2001).
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders (TIC-P)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
TIC-P is a widely used health economic instrument in mental health research for assessing psychiatric healthcare use and societal costs, including service utilization, medication use, and productivity losses (Bouwmans et al., 2013).
In this study, TIC-P will be used to record healthcare resource consumption during the trial, including outpatient visits, medication costs, and other healthcare-related expenditures.
To capture healthcare utilization more comprehensively, a self-developed healthcare utilization questionnaire will also be administered.
|
Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
This is one of the most widely used instruments in health economic evaluation for measuring health-related quality of life and includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with five response levels (Devlin & Brooks, 2017; Herdman et al., 2011).
The health utility values derived from EQ-5D-5L will be used to calculate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) for cost-utility analysis (Drummond et al., 2015; Group, 1990).
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Short Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The SF-8 is a brief self-report questionnaire used to assess general health-related quality of life.
It measures physical and mental health domains and provides summary indicators of overall health status.
Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The ISI is a 7-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of insomnia symptoms and the degree of sleep-related impairment.
Total scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater insomnia severity.
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The CD-RISC is a self-report questionnaire used to assess psychological resilience and the ability to cope with stress and adversity.
Higher scores indicate greater resilience.
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS) will be used to assess participants' subjective perception of life stress.
This scale is derived from the Perceived Stress Scale developed by Cohen et al., and primarily assesses the extent to which individuals perceive life events over the past month as unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overwhelming (Cohen et al., 1983).
The Chinese version of the CPSS has been applied and validated in Chinese populations, with studies demonstrating good internal consistency, structural validity, and criterion-related validity, supporting its use for assessing subjective stress levels (Leung et al., 2010; Ng, 2013).
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The SWLS is a self-report questionnaire used to assess global cognitive judgments of life satisfaction.
Higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction.
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
Adverse Events
時間枠:Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
To evaluate the safety of the intervention, this study will record adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring during the study period.
These events will be defined, documented, and reported in accordance with international clinical trial guidelines, and will be descriptively analyzed with respect to the time of occurrence, severity, relationship to the intervention, and outcome
|
Baseline (T0); Week 3 (T1) and Week 5 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
the Engaging in Life Scale
時間枠:Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The Engaging in Life Scale will be used to assess the degree to which individuals engage in key life domains such as work, study, social interaction, and sleep, and is an important tool for evaluating levels of engagement in life (Chen et al., 2026).
|
Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
Distress tolerance will be assessed using the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS), which measures individuals' capacity to tolerate negative emotional experiences and their regulatory responses to emotional distress (Simons & Gaher, 2005).
|
Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
the Discomfort Intolerance Scale (DIS)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The Discomfort Intolerance Scale (DIS) will be used to assess tolerance of unpleasant bodily sensations, which has been widely applied in anxiety disorder and emotion regulation research (Schmidt et al., 2006).
|
Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
the Excessive Emotional Behavior Scale (EEBS)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The Excessive Emotional Behavior Scale (EEBS) will be used to assess excessive emotion-driven and avoidant behaviors under negative affective states, thereby providing a more comprehensive assessment of this psychological process (Zhang et al., 2026).
|
Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
The Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) will be used to further assess experiential avoidance as a core process (Gámez et al., 2014).
|
Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
|
the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI)
時間枠:Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
Cognitive flexibility will be measured using the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI), which assesses individuals' ability to shift cognitive frameworks, generate alternative explanations, and adopt adaptive thinking strategies under stress (Dennis & Vander Wal, 2010).
|
Baseline (T0); immediately post-intervention at Week 8 (T3); and 3 months (T4), 6 months (T5), 12 months (T6), and 24 months (T7) post-intervention.
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Xinghua Liu, Dr.、Peking University
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- E20260611
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。