The Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Individuals With Tiletamine Use Disorder (taVNS-Tiletami)
2026年7月1日 更新者：Shanghai Mental Health Center
Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Patients With Tiletamine Use Disorder: A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial
Participants diagnosed with tiletamine use disorder will be assigned to active or sham taVNS for 5 days.
Clinical outcomes ( e.g., behavioral paradigms measures and clinical scales ) and physiological markers (e.g., EEG and ECG) will be evaluated at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-ups to determine therapeutic efficacy and mechanisms of action.
調査の概要
状態
まだ募集していません
詳細な説明
Tiletamine use disorder has emerged as a significant public health concern characterized by persistent psychological craving and high relapse rates. This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) can reduce craving levels and improve other outcomes in individuals with tiletamine dependence. Multimodal assessments including electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG) , behavioral paradigms measures and clinical scales will be conducted before and after the treatment.
This study seeks to establish a non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation strategy for substance use disorders and explore the treatment mechanism.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (推定)
30
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究連絡先
- 名前：Jiang Du, M.D, Ph.D
- 電話番号：+8618017311220
- メール：dujiangdou@163.com
研究場所
-
-
Shanghai Municipality
-
Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国、200030
- Shanghai Mental Health Center
-
コンタクト：
- Jiang Du, M.D, Ph.D
- 電話番号：+86 021 6490 6315
- メール：dujiangdou@163.com
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-60 years ≥6 years of education[7.1] DSM-5 diagnosis of substance use disorder related to tiletamine Tiletamine use ≥6 months and ≥1 time/week Ability to provide informed consent Willingness to complete follow-up assessments
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cognitive impairment History of epilepsy, brain injury, neurological disease or serious psychiatric disease Use of cognition-enhancing medications within 6 months Other psychoactive substance abuse within past 5 years (except nicotine) Metal implants in the head or severe skin sensitivity
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：トリプル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Active taVNS
Intervention: Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Stimulation site: Left cymba conchae Frequency: 20 Hz Pulse width: 500 μs Intensity: 0.5-4 mA (perceptible but non-painful) Session duration: 40 minutes Frequency: 4 sessions/day Treatment course: 5 days (20 sessions)
|
The stimulation duration is 40 minutes per session, administered four times daily for 5 consecutive days (20 sessions in total).
|
|
偽コンパレータ：Sham taVNS
Intervention: Sham Stimulation Site: Ipsilateral earlobe Same device appearance and parameters Minimal sensory stimulation without vagal activation Same treatment schedule as active group
|
Identical device appearance and parameters, with minimal sensory stimulation and no vagal activation.
The treatment schedule is identical to that of the active group.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of depressive symptoms
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention,one month after the intervention
|
The PHQ-9, fully known as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, is a self-report assessment tool developed based on the diagnostic criteria in the American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders for screening and evaluating the severity of depression.
The scale consists of nine items corresponding to the core symptoms of depression.
Respondents rate the frequency of symptoms experienced over the past two weeks on a scale of 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating potentially more severe depressive symptoms.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention,one month after the intervention
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of stress symptoms
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
PSS stands for the Perceived Stress Scale.
It is used to assess an individual's subjective perceptions of stress and the frequency of stress-related thoughts and feelings over the past month.
The scale consists of 14 items, with derived 10-item and 4-item versions also available, and uses a five-point scoring system from 0 to 4, ranging from "never" to "very often".
It provides a quick measure of an individual's perceived stress level.
The total score ranges from 0 to 56, corresponding to three stress levels: normal (0-28), elevated (29-42), and high (43-56).
The scale helps identify stress status and provides guidance for adjusting support resources.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
Change of the sleep quality
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
Sleep quality will be measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
The total score of PSQI ranges from 0 to 21, in which higher scores mean poorer sleep quality.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
Change of the anxiety symptoms
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
The GAD-7 is a self-report scale for assessing anxiety symptoms.
It consists of seven items assessing: 1. nervousness or anxiety; 2. uncontrollable worry; 3. excessive worry; 4. difficulty relaxing; 5. restlessness; 6. irritability; and 7. a sense of imp
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
Change of the risky decision-making performance
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention
|
Risky decision-making performance will be assessed using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).
Higher average pumps in the BART indicate greater risk-taking propensity.
Electroencephalography (EEG) will be used to measure neural electrical signals, where increases in relevant electrophysiological indicators may reflect heightened individual sensitivity to negative feedback.
Higher frequency of continued dice rolls indicates greater risk propensity.
Neural activity features related to the task will be analyzed, with specific patterns associated with risk evaluation and reward processing.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention
|
|
Changes in Negative Reinforcement Learning Behaviour
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention,
|
A negative reinforcement learning paradigm was used to assess avoidance-reversal learning behaviour.
Behavioural response bias and learning rate were used to characterise negative reinforcement behavioural traits and negative reinforcement learning ability.
EEG was recorded simultaneously, and changes in relevant electrophysiological indicators may serve as electrophysiological markers of changes in negative reinforcement learning behaviour.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention,
|
|
The change of alcohol craving
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
Alcohol craving will be measured by the alcohol craving Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The total score of VAS ranged from 0 to 10, in which higher scores mean a higher level of alcohol craving.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
The change of alcohol use
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
The AUDIT (the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) consists of 10 items covering drinking frequency, alcohol consumption, alcohol dependence-related symptoms, and adverse consequences caused by alcohol use.
Respondents complete the questionnaire based on their recent drinking behaviour, with each item scored according to different response levels.
The total score ranges from 0 to 40.
Higher scores indicate a higher risk of alcohol-related problems, and the scale can be used to identify hazardous drinking, harmful drinking, and potential risk of alcohol dependence.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
The changes of Resilience
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
The China version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) consists of 25 items and includes three dimensions: tenacity (13 items), strength (8 items), and optimism (4 items).
The scale uses a 5-point Likert scoring method, with scores from 0 to 4 representing "not true at all", "rarely true", "sometimes true", "often true", and "true nearly all the time", respectively.
The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater psychological resilience.
The internal consistency coefficient of the Chinese version is 0.91.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
The condition of childhood experiences
時間枠：Baseline
|
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) includes 25 clinical items and 3 validity items.
The scale uses a 5-point scoring system, ranging from "never true" to "very often true".
Each subscale score ranges from 5 to 25 and is calculated by summing the scores of the items within that subscale.
The total CTQ score is calculated by summing the subscale scores.
Higher scores indicate more severe reported childhood maltreatment.
|
Baseline
|
|
The change of nicotine dependence
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
The FTND is a self-report scale used to assess the severity of nicotine dependence among smokers.
The scale usually consists of six items.
The total score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe nicotine dependence.
It can be used to assess the level of smoking addiction and support the development of smoking cessation interventions.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
Change of the self-control ability
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
Self-control ability will be measured using the Self-Control Scale (SCS).
Higher scores of SCS indicate better self-regulation and impulse control.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
The changes of impulsive behavior
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS-P) includes 59 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale.
Respondents indicate their agreement or disagreement with statements using a 4-point scale (1 = Agree Strongly, 4 = Disagree Strongly).
Scoring involves calculating a mean score for each of the five subscales (scaled 1-4) and a total impulsivity score.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
The changes of morningness-eveningness
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
The Chinese version of the 5-item Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ-5).
The Chinese version of the MEQ-5 consists of five items selected from the Chinese version of the MEQ-19, namely items 1, 7, 10, 18, and 19.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
The change of impulsiveness
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) consists of 30 items.
Each item is rated according to the frequency of occurrence using a 4-point scoring method: rarely/never = 1, occasionally = 2, often = 3, and almost always/always = 4.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
The change of somatic symptom
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
The Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS) consists of 20 items and is a self-report scale using a 4-point rating system (Table 1).
A total raw score above 40 is considered positive.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
|
The change of behavioral inhibition/activation
時間枠：Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
The Behavioral Inhibition/Activation System Scale (BIS/BAS Scale) uses a 4-point scoring system, where 1 indicates "strongly agree" and 4 indicates "strongly disagree".
Higher scores indicate greater activation of the behavioral inhibition system and behavioral activation system.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention,
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
2026年7月1日
一次修了 (推定)
2027年12月1日
研究の完了 (推定)
2028年1月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2026年7月1日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2026年7月1日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2026年7月8日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年7月8日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年7月1日
最終確認日
2026年6月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。