このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

A Novel Clinical Decision Support Tool to Predict Submucosal Invasive Cancer Within Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps

2026年7月10日 更新者：University Hospital, Ghent

Multi-centre Evaluation of a Novel Clinical Decision Support Tool to Predict Submucosal Invasive Cancer Within Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps - A Prospective Study

Colorectal cancer can be effectively prevented by removal of pre-malignant polyps during colonoscopy. Large (>=20mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) require careful assessment before treatment. If submucosal invasive cancer (SMI) is present, it determines whether endoscopic treatment can be curative or whether surgery is needed. Current classification systems to detect SMI are complex, require extensive training, and are underused in non-tertiary hospitals.

A simple web-based clinical decision support tool was created using well-established parameters (presence of a demarcated area, polyp size, Paris classification, location, and granularity) to identify SMI within LNPCPs. Crucially, the tool uses only standard endoscopic imaging available in most endoscopy units.

This prospective multi-centre study evaluates the accuracy of the tool during live endoscopic assessment. Endoscopists of varying experience will assess 10 large colorectal polyps using the tool, then undergo a randomized educational intervention (either a 10-minute instructional video or a 45-minute interactive training session). They will then assess a further 10 polyps using the tool. A third set of 10 assessments at 3 months evaluates durability of learning. Accuracy is compared to expert opinion.

調査の概要

状態

募集

条件

詳細な説明

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of death in the Western world. Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs, >=20mm) represent 2-3% of colorectal polyps and require special attention. The presence of submucosal invasive cancer (SMI) determines whether endoscopic treatment is curative or whether referral for surgery is necessary. Current endoscopic classification systems (JNET, Kudo, NICE) are complex, require specialized equipment, and extensive training, making them underused in non-tertiary practice.

A novel, freely accessible web-based clinical decision support tool (available at gieqs.com/SMI) was developed based on established risk factors for SMI: the presence and characteristics of a demarcated area within the polyp, polyp size (>=40mm), Paris classification, colonic location, and granularity. The tool uses only standard white-light and virtual chromoendoscopy available in the majority of Western endoscopy units.

This is a prospective, multi-centre study conducted across 8 centres in Belgium, the United Kingdom, Israel, and Italy. The study evaluates whether endoscopists of varying experience can accurately detect SMI within LNPCPs during live colonoscopy using this tool.

The study follows a pre-post design with randomization of the educational intervention:

  • Phase 1 (Pre-training): Each endoscopist assesses 10 eligible LNPCPs using a standardized assessment and creates a 1-minute standardized video of each lesion.
  • Educational Intervention: Endoscopists are randomly allocated (1:1) to either (a) a 10-minute non-dynamic instructional video or (b) a 45-minute interactive educational session.
  • Phase 2 (Post-training): Each endoscopist assesses a further 10 LNPCPs using the clinical decision support tool.
  • Phase 3 (Durability): At 3 months, a further 10 assessments are performed to evaluate durability of the training effect.

Expert opinion applied to standardized videos serves as the reference standard. Histopathology results are recorded for all resected specimens. An interim analysis is planned when half the required participants are enrolled.

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (推定)

886

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

Patients with large (≥20mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) detected during colonoscopy or referred for endoscopic resection. Patients with sessile serrated lesions are excluded. Endoscopists must consent and complete the learning intervention. Patients must provide written informed consent for data collection. Participation is voluntary for both groups.

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

Endoscopist participants

  • Gastrointestinal endoscopists of varying abilities and grades
  • Endoscopists who have not previously encountered the clinical decision support tool Patient participants
  • Referred for colonoscopy with appropriate bowel preparation
  • Colorectal polyp >=20mm in size detected or referred for resection
  • Non-pedunculated morphology
  • Non-sessile serrated morphology
  • Signed informed consent for the procedure and trial participation

Exclusion Criteria:

Endoscopist participants:

  • Does not consent to inclusion
  • Does not undergo the learning intervention
  • No connection with endoscopy in gastroenterology

Patient participants:

  • Does not consent to data collection for the study
  • Video of inadequate quality as per opinion of the principal investigator

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか？

デザインの詳細

この研究は何を測定していますか？

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Accuracy of Endoscopic Assessment of the Risk of Submucosal Invasive Cancer Within LNPCPs Using the Clinical Decision Support Tool Compared to Expert Opinion During Live Endoscopy
時間枠：Through study completion, up to 48 months
The accuracy of each endoscopist's assessment of SMI risk using the tool, compared to expert opinion applied to a standardised video of the same procedure. Measured as sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy across pre-training, post-training, and 3-month durability phases.
Through study completion, up to 48 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Percentage of LNPCP Assessments in Which a Demarcated Area Is Correctly Detected Using the Clinical Decision Support Tool, Compared to Expert Opinion
時間枠：Through study completion, up to 48 months
Endoscopists assess presence/absence of a demarcated area on a standardised endoscopic video using the SMI clinical decision support tool. Expert opinion is the reference standard (considered 100% accurate). Accuracy = proportion of assessments concordant with the expert.
Through study completion, up to 48 months
Inter-observer Agreement Among Endoscopists in Detection of a Demarcated Area Within LNPCPs, Measured by Fleiss' Kappa
時間枠：Through study completion, up to 48 months
Agreement among the multiple participating endoscopists rating the same standardised endoscopic videos, quantified by Fleiss' kappa (appropriate for 3+ raters; corrects for chance agreement).
Through study completion, up to 48 months
Percentage of Demarcated Areas in Which the JNET Classification Is Correctly Determined, Compared to Expert Opinion
時間枠：Through study completion, up to 48 months
Endoscopists assign the JNET (Japan NBI Expert Team) classification to the demarcated area within each LNPCP. Expert opinion is the reference standard (considered 100% accurate). Accuracy = proportion of assessments in which the endoscopist's JNET category matches the expert reference.
Through study completion, up to 48 months
Percentage of Lesions in Which Each Morphological Component (Size, Location, Granularity, Paris Classification) Is Correctly Determined, Compared to Expert Opinion
時間枠：Through study completion, up to 48 months
Each morphological component is assessed by the endoscopist and compared to the expert reference standard (considered 100% accurate). Accuracy = proportion of assessments concordant with the expert, reported separately for size, location, granularity, and Paris classification.
Through study completion, up to 48 months
Correct Treatment Decision Based Upon the Tool Score (Rate of Unnecessary Surgery for Benign Disease or Unnecessary Endoscopic Treatment Requiring Subsequent Surgery)
時間枠：Through study completion, up to 48 months
Through study completion, up to 48 months
Endoscopist-Reported Utility of the Clinical Decision Support Tool, Measured by a 5-point Likert-Scale Questionnaire
時間枠：Through study completion, up to 48 months
Participating endoscopists complete a structured questionnaire rating the usability and perceived clinical utility of the tool on a 1-5 Likert scale (1 = not useful, 5 = very useful).
Through study completion, up to 48 months
Difference in Scoring Accuracy Before and After the Educational Intervention, Comparing a 10-minute Instructional Video Versus a 45-minute Interactive Session
時間枠：Through study completion, up to 48 months
Through study completion, up to 48 months
Percentage Accuracy of SMI Detection Using the Clinical Decision Support Tool at 3 Months Post-Intervention
時間枠：3 months after educational intervention
Endoscopists perform a further 10 LNPCP assessments 3 months after the educational intervention, using the SMI clinical decision support tool. Accuracy = proportion of assessments concordant with the expert reference standard (considered 100% accurate). Compared to immediately post-intervention accuracy to assess durability of the learning effect.
3 months after educational intervention

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

University Hospital, Ghent

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2022年10月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2030年9月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2030年9月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月4日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年7月10日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年7月15日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年7月15日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年7月10日

最終確認日

2026年7月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

キーワード

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • ONZ-2022-0256

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する