このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Ultrasound Versus Palpation for Determining Spinal Puncture Level in Cesarean Section (USG-SPINE)

2026年8月24日 更新者:Feyza Calisir、Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

Comparison of Ultrasound and Palpation for Determining the Level of Entry in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Technical Success, Level Accuracy and Maternal Hemodynamic Response - A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study compares two methods of identifying the correct intervertebral level before performing spinal anesthesia in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

In current practice, anesthesiologists locate the puncture site by feeling anatomical landmarks on the lower back (palpation of Tuffier's line). Ultrasound imaging offers an alternative in which the spine is scanned and the intended level is marked on the skin before the needle is inserted. It is not yet clear whether this additional step improves the success of the procedure or affects the mother's blood pressure and heart rate after the block.

Sixty pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In one group, the puncture level will be determined by preprocedural ultrasound marking; in the other, by conventional landmark palpation. All other aspects of anesthetic care, including drug doses, will be identical in both groups.

The main outcome is the proportion of patients in whom the subarachnoid space is entered successfully at the first attempt with a single skin puncture, producing a block adequate for surgery. Additional outcomes include the number of needle passes, procedure duration, changes in maternal blood pressure and heart rate, vasopressor requirement, sensory block level, and complications such as headache or back pain within 24 hours after surgery.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Detailed Description - teknik açıklama, 32.000 karakter sınırı var. Brief Summary'de olmayan yöntem detayları buraya girer. Metin:

Background and Rationale

Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for elective cesarean delivery. The intended puncture site is conventionally identified by palpating Tuffier's line, an imaginary line joining the iliac crests, which is assumed to cross the L4 vertebral body or the L4-L5 interspace. Anatomical studies and imaging data have shown that this assumption is unreliable, particularly in pregnancy, where lumbar lordosis, soft tissue changes and altered pelvic tilt shift the landmark cephalad in a substantial proportion of women. Levels selected by palpation are therefore frequently one or more interspaces higher than intended.

Preprocedural ultrasound allows direct visualization of the sacrum and the lumbar interlaminar spaces, and the selected level can be marked on the skin before needle insertion. Whether the improvement in level accuracy translates into clinically meaningful differences in technical success and maternal hemodynamic response has not been established consistently in the obstetric population.

Study Design

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, single-center trial conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Health Practice and Research Hospital.

Sixty ASA II-III women aged 18-45 years with singleton pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be enrolled after written informed consent. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1 (30 per group).

Interventions

Ultrasound group: Before the procedure, the lumbar spine will be scanned with a low-frequency curvilinear probe in the patient's sitting position. The sacrum will be identified in the paramedian sagittal oblique plane and interspaces counted cephalad. The target interspace will be marked on the skin, and the transverse midline plane will be used to confirm the midline. Spinal anesthesia will then be performed at the marked level.

Palpation group: The puncture level will be determined by palpation of Tuffier's line according to standard clinical practice, without ultrasound assistance.

In both groups, spinal anesthesia will be performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle. Hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl will be administered as a single dose, calculated according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted; if unsuccessful, the case will be managed at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist and recorded as a failure of the allocated technique.

After completion of the block, and without any modification of clinical management, ultrasonography will be used in both groups purely for observational purposes to verify the intervertebral level at which the dural puncture was performed. This exploratory assessment allows quantification of level accuracy in both arms.

Measurements

Baseline maternal characteristics (age, height, weight, body mass index, gestational age, ASA class, parity) will be recorded. Procedure-related variables include the number of skin punctures, number of needle redirections, and procedure duration measured from needle-skin contact to visualization of cerebrospinal fluid.

Non-invasive blood pressure and heart rate will be recorded at baseline and every 3 minutes thereafter until delivery and subsequently until the end of surgery. Hypotension is defined as a mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg or a decrease of 20% or more from the baseline value, and will be treated with intravenous ephedrine according to institutional protocol; total ephedrine dose will be recorded.

Sensory block level will be assessed bilaterally at 10 and 15 minutes after intrathecal injection. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting, paresthesia during needle insertion, bloody tap, incomplete block, requirement for supplemental analgesia, and conversion to general anesthesia will be documented. Patients will be assessed at 24 hours postoperatively for post-dural puncture headache, back pain, and satisfaction using a visual analogue scale.

Sample Size

The sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1, based on success rates reported by Li et al. (2019). For the comparison of proportions between two independent groups using Fisher's exact test, with a significance level of 0.05, power of 0.80, and an effect size of h = 0.79, a minimum of 30 participants per group is required, giving a total of 60 participants.

Statistical Analysis

Distribution of continuous variables will be assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test and visual methods. Normally distributed data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation and non-normally distributed data as median with interquartile range. Between-group comparisons will use the independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and the chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Changes in hemodynamic parameters over time will be analyzed using repeated measures analysis (mixed model or repeated measures ANOVA, according to assumption checks). Statistical significance will be accepted at p < 0.05. Analyses will primarily follow the intention-to-treat principle, and missing data will be reported.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

66

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究連絡先のバックアップ

研究場所

    • Onikişubat
      • Kahramanmaraş、Onikişubat、トルコ(Türkiye)、46040
        • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Health Practice and Research Hospital
        • コンタクト:
        • コンタクト:
        • 主任研究者:
          • Feyza Çalışır, MD
        • 副調査官:
          • Betül Bağrıaçık, MD
        • 副調査官:
          • Selim Karaküçük, MD
      • Kahramanmaraş、Onikişubat、トルコ(Türkiye)、46100
        • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Health Practice and Research Hospital
        • 副調査官:
          • Betül Bağrıaçık, MD
        • 副調査官:
          • Selim Karaküçük, MD
        • コンタクト:

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
  • Age 18 to 45 years
  • ASA physical status II or III
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • No contraindication to spinal anesthesia
  • Normotensive
  • Provides written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency cesarean section
  • Morbid obesity (body mass index 40 kg/m² or higher)
  • History of lumbar spine surgery
  • Severe spinal deformity
  • Local infection at the puncture site
  • Coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulant therapy
  • Anatomical abnormality expected to require multiple puncture attempts

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:診断
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Ultrasound Group
Preprocedural ultrasound scanning of the lumbar spine in the sitting position with a low-frequency curvilinear probe. The sacrum is identified in the paramedian sagittal oblique plane, interspaces are counted cephalad, and the target interspace is marked on the skin. Spinal anesthesia is then performed at the marked level.
Ultrasound-assisted identification and skin marking of the target intervertebral level before spinal needle insertion. Spinal anesthesia is performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle, with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl dosed according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted.
アクティブコンパレータ:Palpation Group
Puncture level determined by palpation of Tuffier's line according to standard clinical practice, without ultrasound assistance. Spinal anesthesia is performed at the palpated level.
Identification of the target intervertebral level by palpation of Tuffier's line. Spinal anesthesia is performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle, with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl dosed according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
First-attempt success rate
時間枠:During spinal procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Successful dural puncture (CSF flow) with a single skin puncture at the selected level, with adequate surgical block and no need for supplemental analgesia or GA.
During spinal procedure (up to 30 minutes)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Number of skin punctures and needle redirections
時間枠:During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Number of skin punctures and number of needle redirections required to achieve dural puncture
During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Procedure duration
時間枠:During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Time from needle-skin contact to visualization of cerebrospinal fluid
During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Incidence of hypotension
時間枠:From intrathecal injection to end of surgery, up to 90 minutes
Mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg or a decrease of 20% or more from baseline
From intrathecal injection to end of surgery, up to 90 minutes
Total ephedrine dose
時間枠:From intrathecal injection to end of surgery, up to 90 minutes
From intrathecal injection to end of surgery, up to 90 minutes
Sensory block level
時間枠:10 and 15 minutes after intrathecal injection
Assessed bilaterally by pinprick
10 and 15 minutes after intrathecal injection
Incidence of nausea and vomiting
時間枠:Intraoperative period, up to 90 minutes
Intraoperative period, up to 90 minutes
Incidence of paresthesia during needle insertion
時間枠:During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Incidence of bloody tap
時間枠:During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Incidence of incomplete block requiring supplemental analgesia or conversion to general anesthesia
時間枠:Intraoperative period, up to 90 minutes
Intraoperative period, up to 90 minutes
Incidence of post-dural puncture headache
時間枠:Within 24 hours after surgery
Within 24 hours after surgery

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Feyza Çalışır、Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年9月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年9月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年9月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年7月24日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年8月24日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年8月27日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年8月27日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年8月24日

最終確認日

2026年8月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. De-identified data supporting the published results may be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the institutional ethics committee and in accordance with national data protection legislation.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する