Scenario-Based Hybrid Simulation for Patient Education in Assisted Reproductive Treatment
The Effect of a Scenario-Based Hybrid Simulation Aimed at Educating Patients Receiving Assisted Reproductive Treatment on Nursing Students' Anxiety, Effective Communication, Self-Efficacy, Knowledge, and Skills
This study aims to evaluate the effect of a scenario-based hybrid simulation designed for patient education in assisted reproductive treatment on nursing students' anxiety, effective communication, self-efficacy, knowledge, and skills. The study will include third-year nursing students enrolled in the Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Nursing course. Participants will receive six weeks of theoretical and video-based education followed by two scenario-based hybrid simulation sessions conducted four weeks apart. Outcomes will be assessed at four time points (T0, T1, T2, and T3). A preliminary application is planned with 6 students, followed by the main study with 30 students.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
This study will use a single-group quasi-experimental design with repeated measurements. Participants will be third-year nursing students enrolled in the Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Nursing course at Düzce University Faculty of Health Sciences. After providing informed consent, baseline assessments (T0) will be conducted using the Introductory Information Form, anxiety, effective communication, self-efficacy, and assisted reproductive technologies knowledge measures.
Participants will then receive six weeks of structured theoretical education and video-based training. At the end of this period, the same outcome measures will be administered at T1. Participants will subsequently take part in the first scenario-based hybrid simulation involving a standardized female patient, a standardized male partner, and an injection model. The simulation will focus on assisted reproductive treatment stages, patient education, gonadotropin medication administration, and assessment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), followed by debriefing.
Immediately after the first simulation, T2 assessments will be conducted, including anxiety, effective communication, self-efficacy, knowledge, and skill assessment. Four weeks later, participants will complete a second scenario-based hybrid simulation with the same learning objectives, followed by debriefing and the final T3 assessment.
A preliminary application is planned with 6 nursing students to evaluate the feasibility of the educational content, simulation scenario, assessment instruments, and implementation process. These students will not be included in the main study. The main study is planned with 30 eligible nursing students.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前:Hilal KARADENİZ, PhD
- 電話番号:+90 0538 692 49 93
- メール:hilalkaradeniz1993@hotmail.com
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being a third-year undergraduate nursing student.
- Being enrolled in the Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Nursing course.
- Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study.
- Having no previous experience with scenario-based or hybrid simulation training on assisted reproductive treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not completing the simulation sessions.
- Not completing any of the required data collection assessments.
- Withdrawing from the study voluntarily.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:他の
- 割り当て:なし
- 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Scenario-Based Hybrid Simulation
Participants will receive six weeks of structured theoretical and video-based education followed by two scenario-based hybrid simulation sessions conducted four weeks apart. The simulations will involve a standardized female patient, a standardized male partner, and an injection model. Students will provide education regarding assisted reproductive treatment, gonadotropin medication administration, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. |
Participants will receive six weeks of structured theoretical and video-based education on assisted reproductive technologies and nursing, followed by two scenario-based hybrid simulation sessions conducted four weeks apart. Each simulation will involve a standardized female patient, a standardized male partner, and an injection model. Students will provide education on assisted reproductive treatment stages, the role of the male partner, gonadotropin medication administration, and risk factors and signs and symptoms of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Each simulation will be followed by a structured debriefing session. |
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Assisted Reproductive Technologies Knowledge Score
時間枠:At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
|
Change in students' knowledge regarding assisted reproductive technologies, assessed using the researcher-developed Assisted Reproductive Technologies Knowledge Test. The knowledge test was developed by the researchers based on the relevant literature and study objectives. The content validity of the test was evaluated through expert review, and a preliminary application was conducted with students from a different group who were not included in the main study. Item difficulty analyses were performed based on the preliminary application to evaluate the appropriateness and discriminatory characteristics of the test items. Higher scores indicate a higher level of knowledge regarding assisted reproductive technologies. |
At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Effective Communication Skills
時間枠:At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
|
Effective communication skills will be assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 using the Effective Communication Skills Scale. The scale consists of 34 items and five subdimensions: ego-enhancing language, active listening, self-awareness/self-disclosure, empathy, and use of "I" language. It uses a 5-point Likert-type response format, with higher scores indicating better effective communication skills.Cronbach alfa value is 0.93 for the full scale, and 0.85, 0.90, 0.78, 0.91, and 0.53 for the Ego Supportive Language, Active-Participative Listening, Self-recognition/Self-disclosure, Empathy, and I-language sub-dimensions, respectively. |
At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
|
|
Change in Anxiety Level
時間枠:At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
|
Anxiety will be assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The STAI is a 40-item self-report instrument consisting of two subscales: State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety, with 20 items in each subscale. Items are rated on a 4-point response scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. The Turkish version of the STAI has been adapted and validated for use in Turkish populations. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were reported as 0.92 for state anxiety and 0.87 for trait anxiety. |
At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
|
|
Change in Self-Efficacy
時間枠:At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
|
Self-efficacy will be assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 using the Student Self-Efficacy Scale. The scale consists of 10 items and has a single-factor structure. It is a self-report measure developed to assess students' perceived self-efficacy. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy. The Turkish version of the scale has demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability among undergraduate nursing students.The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.81, while corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.45 to 0.56. |
At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
|
|
Change in Simulation Skill Performance
時間枠:Skills will be assessed at two time points: immediately after the first simulation (Week 8) and immediately after the second simulation (Week 12), with a 4-week interval between assessments.
|
Simulation skill performance will be assessed during the first and second simulation sessions (T2 and T3) using the researcher-developed Skill Assessment Form. The form was developed based on the study objectives and relevant literature, and its content was evaluated through expert review. The form evaluates students' performance in communicating with the female patient and male partner, explaining the stages of assisted reproductive treatment and the role of the male partner, preparing and administering gonadotropin medication, and providing education on medication administration. Higher scores indicate better performance. |
Skills will be assessed at two time points: immediately after the first simulation (Week 8) and immediately after the second simulation (Week 12), with a 4-week interval between assessments.
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Hilal Karadeniz、Duzce University
- スタディディレクター:Atiye Erbaş, PhD、Duzce University
出版物と役立つリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- DUZCEU-ARTSIM-2026
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers because the study involves a relatively small group of nursing students from a single institution. Sharing individual-level data may increase the risk of participant identification and compromise confidentiality and privacy, particularly when combined with participants' demographic and academic characteristics. Therefore, individual participant data will be kept confidential and will not be made available for external research use.
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。