このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences (PREVENT-DERS)

2026年11月2日 更新者:Liu Jianlin、Institute of Mental Health, Singapore

Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences: The PREVENT-DERS Randomized Controlled Trial

The present study aims to determine whether a personalized digital psychoeducation intervention (active intervention group) is more effective than self-monitoring of one's mood (control group) in reducing emotion regulation difficulties, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in at-risk youths exposed to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs).

We hypothesized that the active intervention group will be associated with less severe emotion regulation difficulties, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms than the control group at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. This study will recruit a total of N = 140 youths (age 15 to 35 years) with ACEs and randomized into either the active intervention group (n = 70) or the control group (n = 70). Participants will complete study measures at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. The study team has expertise in youth mental health. This study is feasible and will be completed within 4 years. Our findings will support the development and implementation of an efficacious, cost-effective, personalized and scalable intervention to reduce poor mental health and prevent the onset of mental disorders among at-risk youths. Our intervention has significant potential to improve population health, quality of life, functioning, morbidity, and mortality, as well as alleviate the healthcare burden associated with ACEs.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Specific aims:

This study aims to examine the efficacy of personalized digital psychoeducation to self-monitoring control (1) to reduce poor mental health as indexed by self-reported depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms at post-intervention and at 3-month follow-up; and (2) to reduce emotion dysregulation as indexed by momentary emotion regulation ability deficits and rumination severity at post-intervention in youths with elevated hypothesized risk (exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and elevated levels of emotion dysregulation, or mild to moderate depression, anxiety or stress symptoms).

Hypotheses:

We hypothesized that (1) the active intervention group will be associated with less depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms than the control group at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up; (2) the active intervention group will be associated with less severe emotion dysregulation than the control group at post-intervention.

Methodology and approach:

This study will involve a two-arm, single-blinded, prospective (i.e., three time-points; baseline, post-intervention, 3-month follow-up), pilot randomized controlled trial. A total of N = 140 youths (age 15 to 35 years) with ACEs will be recruited and randomized into either the active intervention group (Personalized Psychoeducation + Self-Monitoring; n = 70) or the control group (Self-Monitoring; n = 70).

Feasibility:

The study team has clinical and research expertise in youth mental health. This study is supported by a multidisciplinary team of established clinician-scientists and researchers. It is expected that this study will be completed within four years.

Importance to science or medicine:

We aim to develop an efficacious, cost-effective, personalized, scalable, and accessible transdiagnostic intervention to reduce poor mental health and prevent the onset of mental disorders among youths exposed to ACEs. Our intervention has a significant public health impact due to positive downstream effects on improving population health, quality of life, functioning, morbidity, and mortality, as well as alleviating the healthcare burden due to ACEs.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

140

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

15年~35年 (子、大人)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Exposed to at least one Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE)
  • Screened positive for elevated scores on the Difficulty with Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) OR Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) OR mild to moderate scores on the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)
  • Aged 15 years to 35 years
  • Singapore citizens or permanent residents
  • Able to speak or understand English
  • Regular access to a smart phone or tablet with internet connection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported diagnosis of any mental disorder
  • Currently seeking mental health support from any mental health professional (i.e., psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, counsellor, etc.) for any mental health difficulties
  • Self-reported active suicidal behavior
  • Miss 2 consecutive intervention sessions

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Personalized digital psychoeducation intervention on emotion regulation

In this active intervention arm, participants will undergo a 4-week (1 hour per session) online psychoeducation and skills training intervention focused on improving emotion regulation skills. We will tailor and personalize the 4-week intervention to each participant based on the Ecological Momentary Assessment-generated emotion regulation profiles at baseline. Emotion regulation profiles are mapped to 6 core areas (poor emotional awareness, poor emotional clarity, non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulty in engaging in goal-directed behavior, impulsivity, and limited access to adaptive emotion regulation strategies) as outlined by the validated Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) or DERS model.

The Active Intervention is a 4-week (1 hour per session) online psychoeducation and skills training intervention focused on improving emotion regulation skills. The Active Intervention includes personalized and non-personalized syllabus. The non-personalized intervention syllabus includes the following content: Session 1 (Enhancing emotional awareness and clarity), Session 2 (Accepting emotional responses), Session 3 (Reducing impulsivity and engaging in goal-directed behavior), and Session 4 (Accessing emotion regulation strategies). The personalized syllabus is based on each participant's Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)-generated emotion regulation profiles at baseline. In general, for weaker areas, we will reduce the difficulty in the type of skills taught and provide more skills practice. For stronger areas, we will teach more advanced skills for the participant to explore. Participants will undergo EMA self-monitoring of their emotions between each intervention session.

アクティブコンパレータ:Lifestyle psychoeducation intervention

In this Active Comparator arm, participants will undergo a 4-week (1 hour per session) online psychoeducation intervention focused on learning healthy lifestyle strategies. The purpose of this arm is to support the blinding process, where both arms appear to receive similar interventions. Further, the lifestyle psychoeducation intervention is an evidence-based prevention intervention for depression and anxiety.

The Control Intervention is a 4-week (1 hour per session) online psychoeducation intervention focused on learning healthy lifestyle strategies. The first online session (Week 1) involves providing participants with a background of psychoeducation, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), and mental health. The second online session (Week 2) involves teaching participants the importance of sleep hygiene. The third online session (Week 3) involves teaching participants the importance of a healthy diet. The fourth online session (Week 4) involves teaching participants the importance of exercise and providing an overview of outdoor activities in Singapore. Participants will undergo Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) self-monitoring of their emotions between each intervention session.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress as Assessed by DASS-21
時間枠:From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up

The 21-item Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) will be used to screen for mild to moderate depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. The DASS will also be administered at post-intervention and at the 3-month follow-up. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Did not apply to me) to 3 (Applied to me very much); higher scores indicate more severe depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Each subscale comprises 7 items and the subscale scores will be summed and multiplied by 2 as per scoring guidelines. Hence, each subscale score will range from 0 to 42.

From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up
Global Emotion Dysregulation as Assessed by the DERS-SF
時間枠:From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up

The 18-item Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale Short-Form (DERS-SF; Kaufman et al., 2016) will be used to screen for elevated levels of global emotion dysregulation. Global emotion dysregulation has 6 subscales: poor emotional awareness, poor emotional clarity, non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulty in engaging in goal-directed behavior, impulsivity, and limited access to adaptive emotion regulation strategies. These subscales correspond to the 6 dimensions of the DERS model. Each item is rated a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Almost never) to 5 (Almost always); higher scores will indicate more severe global emotion dysregulation (scores range from 18 to 90).

From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up
Ecological Assessment of Momentary Emotion Dysregulation
時間枠:From baseline to the end of intervention at 4 weeks

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of emotion dysregulation in the following two areas: Rumination and emotion regulation abilities. Two EMA items to assess rumination in response to recent stressors since the previous beep (How much were you focusing on the stressors? How much were you focusing on your emotions due to the stressors?). Both items are rated on a 100-point visual slider scale from 0 (not at all) to 100 (extremely). 21 EMA items to assess for emotion regulation abilities. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely).

From baseline to the end of intervention at 4 weeks
Rumination as Assessed by the RRS
時間枠:From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up

The 10-item Ruminative Response Scale short-form (RRS; Treynor et al., 2003) will be used to screen for elevated levels of rumination. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Almost never) to 4 (Almost always); higher scores indicate more severe rumination (scores range from 10 to 40).

From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Subjective Well-Being as Assessed by the WEMWBS
時間枠:From enrollment to the 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up

The 14-item Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS; Tennant et al., 2007) will be used to assess for subjective well-being. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time); higher scores indicate better positive well-being.

From enrollment to the 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up
Multi-Dimensional Impulsivity as Assessed by the UPPS-P
時間枠:From enrollment to three-month (post-intervention) follow-up

The 20-item Urgency-Premeditation-Perseverance-Sensation Seeking-Positive Urgency scale (UPPS-P; Cyders et al., 2014) will be used to assess for multi-dimensional impulsivity and the subdomains include negative and positive urgency, lack of perseverance, lack of premeditation, and sensation-seeking. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree).

From enrollment to three-month (post-intervention) follow-up

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • スタディディレクター:Mythily Subramaniam, Ph.D.、Institute of Mental Health, Singapore

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年12月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2029年4月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2030年4月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年11月2日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年11月2日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年11月6日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月6日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年11月2日

最終確認日

2026年8月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD プランの説明

All de-identified IPD used in the results publication and subjected to formal approval by our governing ethics board.

IPD 共有時間枠

Beginning 1 year after publication with no end date

IPD 共有アクセス基準

Researchers who contact the Principal Investigator and (1) submit a proposal that describes planned analyses (including but not limited to IPD meta-analysis, Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analyses based on pooled RCT data); and (2) sign a data sharing agreement; and (3) receive formal approval from our governing ethics board may be granted access to the de-identified IPD. Access to the de-identified IPD will be provided by the Principal Investigator and/or other methods (e.g., Trust Platform) as approved by our ethics boards and stated in the signed data sharing agreement.

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する