このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Reminiscence Therapy-Based Social Group Work for Older Adults in Long-Term Institutional Care (AT-GSH)

2026年11月5日 更新者:Melike Türkmen

The Effect of a Reminiscence Therapy-Based Social Group Work Intervention on Cognitive Status, Psychological Well-Being, and Quality of Life in Older Adults Receiving Long-Term Institutional Care

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether a reminiscence therapy-based social group work intervention (AT-GSH) improves psychological well-being, quality of life, and cognitive status in older adults living in long-term institutional care who are at risk of mild cognitive impairment.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does AT-GSH improve psychological well-being shortly after the intervention?
  • Does AT-GSH improve psychological well-being at the 12-week follow-up?
  • Does AT-GSH improve quality of life and cognitive status shortly after the intervention and at the 12-week follow-up?

The study plans to include 44 adults aged 60 years or older who meet the study's screening criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention group or a wait-list control group.

Participants in the intervention group will attend a preparation meeting followed by eight weekly, 60-minute face-to-face sessions in closed groups of 6 to 10 members. The sessions will involve recalling, sharing, and reflecting on memories from different periods of life.

Researchers will compare this group with participants in the wait-list control group, who will continue receiving the institution's usual health, care, and social activity services.

Participants in the intervention group will complete assessments before the intervention, within 1 to 7 days after the final intervention session, and 12 weeks (plus or minus one week) after the final session. Participants in the wait-list control group will complete assessments during the same calendar weeks. The main comparison will focus on psychological well-being shortly after the intervention, taking initial psychological well-being scores into account.

After the final follow-up assessment, the wait-list control group will be offered the same intervention on a voluntary basis.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

AT-GSH is a structured social group work intervention grounded in an existential social work approach. The intervention combines structured reminiscence activities with group interaction and reflection on personal life experiences. It is guided by social work principles, including self-determination, respect for human dignity, voluntary participation, and mutual aid.

The intervention will be delivered by the researcher, who is a social worker, at a nursing home affiliated with Bursa Metropolitan Municipality, Turkiye. Each closed group will first attend a face-to-face preparation meeting lasting approximately 30 minutes. This meeting is separate from the eight thematic intervention sessions.

The intervention consists of eight weekly, 60-minute sessions. Sessions 1 to 7 address childhood, school life, youth, working life, family life, social ties, and later life, respectively. Session 8 focuses on reviewing life experiences and the planned termination of the group process.

Each session includes opening, reminiscence and reflection, and closing phases. Photographs, objects, music, and other memory-triggering materials may be used to facilitate recall and discussion. Participants may choose which experiences they wish to share.

The intervention protocol was structured in accordance with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Intervention fidelity will be documented using session implementation records and supported by face-to-face supervision after each session. Attendance at at least seven of the eight thematic sessions will be considered intervention completion.

Psychological well-being and quality of life will be assessed by an independent assessor who is unaware of group allocation. Cognitive status will be assessed by the certified researcher delivering the intervention, who is not blinded to group allocation.

The primary analysis will compare psychological well-being between the intervention and control groups shortly after the intervention while accounting for baseline scores. Additional analyses will examine psychological well-being at the 12-week follow-up and quality of life and cognitive status at both post-intervention and follow-up assessments.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

44

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

    • Bursa
      • Bursa、Bursa、トルコ(Türkiye)、16320
        • Fethiye Dortcelik Nursing Home, Bursa Metropolitan Municipality
        • コンタクト:
        • 主任研究者:
          • Melike Türkmen

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

60年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 60 years or older and living in the participating nursing home
  • Cognitive complaint during the past year, reported by the participant or by responsible institutional staff (at least "sometimes" on either item)
  • Raw Turkish Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-TR) score within the education-specific screening range: 16-17 for primary school graduates, 19-20 for middle school or high school graduates, and 20-22 for higher education graduates (Kaya et al., 2014); no education correction is applied
  • Largely preserved instrumental activities of daily living (Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale score of 6-8 out of 8)
  • At least primary school education
  • Able to communicate sufficiently to complete the assessments
  • Provides written informed consent and agrees to participate in group sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or another progressive neurodegenerative disease, as reported by the participant or responsible institutional staff
  • Marked visual or hearing impairment that prevents assessment or group participation despite appropriate aids
  • Acute medical condition, suspected acute confusion or delirium, significant psychiatric problem, or neurological disorder that prevents safe group participation or valid assessment, as reported by the participant or responsible institutional staff or observed during assessment

The at-risk profile for mild cognitive impairment is a study-specific operational definition and does not constitute a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:支持療法
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:AT-GSH Intervention Group

Participants will attend a face-to-face preparation meeting followed by eight weekly, 60-minute reminiscence therapy-based social group work (AT-GSH) sessions delivered by a social worker in closed groups of 6 to 10 members.

AT-GSH is a structured, face-to-face social group work intervention grounded in existential social work. It is delivered by a social worker in closed groups of 6 to 10 older adults. A preparation meeting of approximately 30 minutes precedes eight weekly, 60-minute sessions. The first seven sessions address childhood, school life, youth, working life, family life, social ties, and later life. The final session focuses on reviewing life experiences and ending the group process. Sessions include opening, reminiscence and reflection, and closing phases. Open-ended questions and memory-triggering materials facilitate voluntary sharing and reflection. Intervention fidelity is documented through session records and supervision.

他の名前:
  • AT-GSH
介入なし:Wait-List Control Group

Participants will continue receiving the institution's usual health, care, and social activity services and will not receive AT-GSH until the final follow-up assessment. After the final follow-up assessment, they will be offered AT-GSH on a voluntary basis.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Psychological Well-Being Score at Post-Intervention
時間枠:Baseline (before randomization) and post-intervention (1 to 7 days after the final AT-GSH session; control group assessed during the same calendar week)

Psychological well-being will be assessed using the Turkish version of the eight-item Flourishing Scale (Psychological Well-Being Scale; Diener et al., 2010; Telef, 2013), rated on a 7-point scale. Total scores range from 8 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater psychological well-being. Post-intervention scores will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups, adjusting for baseline scores. The scale is administered by an independent assessor blinded to group allocation.

Baseline (before randomization) and post-intervention (1 to 7 days after the final AT-GSH session; control group assessed during the same calendar week)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Psychological Well-Being Score at 12-Week Follow-Up
時間枠:Baseline (before randomization) and 12 weeks (plus or minus 1 week) after the final AT-GSH session; control group assessed during the same calendar week

Psychological well-being will be assessed using the Turkish version of the eight-item Flourishing Scale (Psychological Well-Being Scale). Total scores range from 8 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater psychological well-being. Follow-up scores will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups, adjusting for baseline scores. The scale is administered by an independent assessor blinded to group allocation.

Baseline (before randomization) and 12 weeks (plus or minus 1 week) after the final AT-GSH session; control group assessed during the same calendar week
Quality of Life Score at Post-Intervention and 12-Week Follow-Up
時間枠:Baseline (before randomization), post-intervention (1 to 7 days after the final AT-GSH session), and 12 weeks (plus or minus 1 week) after the final AT-GSH session; control group assessed during the same calendar weeks

Quality of life will be assessed using the Turkish version of the 13-item Older People's Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brief (OPQOL-brief; Bowling et al., 2013; Caliskan et al., 2019), rated on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Scores will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups, adjusting for baseline scores. The scale is administered by an independent assessor blinded to group allocation.

Baseline (before randomization), post-intervention (1 to 7 days after the final AT-GSH session), and 12 weeks (plus or minus 1 week) after the final AT-GSH session; control group assessed during the same calendar weeks
Cognitive Status Score at Post-Intervention and 12-Week Follow-Up
時間枠:Baseline (before randomization), post-intervention (1 to 7 days after the final AT-GSH session), and 12 weeks (plus or minus 1 week) after the final AT-GSH session; control group assessed during the same calendar weeks.

Cognitive status will be assessed using the Turkish version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-TR; Nasreddine et al., 2005; Selekler et al., 2010). Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Scores will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups, adjusting for baseline scores. The test is administered by the certified researcher delivering the intervention, who is not blinded to group allocation.

Baseline (before randomization), post-intervention (1 to 7 days after the final AT-GSH session), and 12 weeks (plus or minus 1 week) after the final AT-GSH session; control group assessed during the same calendar weeks.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Melike Türkmen、Duzce University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年11月19日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年1月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年6月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年11月5日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年11月5日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年11月10日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月10日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年11月5日

最終確認日

2026年11月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • AT-GSH-2026-01
  • 2026-951 (その他の識別子:Ondokuz Mayis University Social and Human Sciences Research Ethics Committee)

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

Individual participant data will not be shared. The informed consent obtained from participants does not cover sharing individual-level data with other researchers, and the small sample recruited from a single institution increases the risk of re-identification. Aggregated results will be reported in the doctoral thesis and related publications.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する