このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

A Preliminary Study on the Feasibility and Effects of a Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress (MIED)-Based Group Intervention for Adolescents (Online Format)

2026年11月5日 更新者:Xinghua Liu

Background: Emotional distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms) among adolescents is rising globally. In China, the detection rate of depression risk among secondary school students is 24.6%, and that of anxiety risk is 18.1%; comorbidity, relapse and disability rates are all high, seriously affecting adolescents' academic performance, social relationships and quality of life. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have shown substantial effects in children and adolescents, with meta-analyses reporting a moderate effect size for internalizing problems (Hedges' g = 0.47). Group-based mindfulness interventions for adolescents are feasible: the group format improves efficiency, reduces costs and provides social support. However, existing research remains limited in cultural adaptation and in the systematicity of intervention protocols. The MIED (Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress) system, developed by Professor Liu Xinghua on the basis of MBSR and the Unified Protocol (UP), centres on the "diamond model" of emotional distress, which identifies four core maintaining mechanisms: engagement in life, tolerance of distress, emotional behaviours, and cognitive flexibility. Adult studies of MIED show significant improvement in emotional distress, yet no dedicated study has applied it to adolescents.

Methods: This is an exploratory feasibility study using a single-group pre-post design. It plans to recruit 26 adolescents aged 12-18 years with emotional distress for an 8-week online MIED group intervention for adolescents (two online groups, 12-13 participants per group, with an expected effective sample of 20-24). Data will be collected at multiple time points: baseline, after the 4th session, after the 8th session, and at 1-month follow-up.

Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility of the MIED-based adolescent mindfulness group intervention (recruitment feasibility, retention feasibility, implementation feasibility, acceptability, and safety). The secondary objective is to preliminarily evaluate the intervention's effects on anxiety, depression, stress and other outcomes, and to estimate effect sizes, thereby providing methodological preparation for a subsequent large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT).

調査の概要

状態

まだ募集していません

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

40

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

12年~18年 (子、大人)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 12-18 years, minors (junior and senior high school level; special note: individuals who exceed the age criterion due to dropout or leave of absence but are still in junior or senior high school may be included if they meet all other inclusion criteria).

PHQ-9 total score 10-19 or GAD-7 total score 10-14 (either criterion is sufficient, indicating mild to moderate depressive or anxiety symptoms).

Informed consent from both the participant and their parent/legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PHQ-9 total score ≥20 or GAD-7 total score ≥15, or clinical diagnosis of severe anxiety or depressive disorder (if severe depression or anxiety, referral to individual therapy is recommended).

PHQ-9 item 9 score ≥2 and clinical interview confirming active suicidal ideation or plan.

Presence of psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder, or severe self-harm behaviors (requiring medical treatment).

Currently receiving other systematic psychotherapy. Severe cognitive or developmental disorders that prevent understanding of group content.

Unable to use a smartphone (affecting use of AI-assisted tools)

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:なし
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Adolescent Group(online)

Adolescent Group Curriculum:8-week online group curriculum adapted from the adult MIED course for adolescents' cognitive development, social needs and preferences. 8 weekly sessions, 90-120 min each, via video conferencing; 2-3 groups of 9-13 participants (27-30 recruited, expected effective sample 20-24). Based on the MIED diamond model: engagement in life, tolerance of distress, emotional behaviours, cognitive flexibility. Interactive design and AI-assisted tools boost participation and practice adherence; modules refined per prior evidence.

Parent Group Curriculum:Based on the parent group approach in the Chinese UP-A (Pan et al., 2025). Aims: improve parents' understanding of adolescent emotional distress; teach strategies supporting adolescents' mindfulness practice and emotion regulation; improve parent-child communication; support parents' own MIED practice and stress management. 4 sessions, every 2 weeks, 120 min each, online, parallel with the adolescent group.

Adolescent Group: Basic curriculum structure: 8 sessions, once per week, 90-120 minutes per session, 12-20 participants per group. Parent Group Curriculum:Number of sessions: 4 (or 8, synchronized with the adolescent group), once every 2 weeks (or once per week), 120 minutes per session.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale(GAD-7)
時間枠:Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

Anxiety symptoms: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcome (more severe anxiety symptoms)

Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9(PHQ-9)
時間枠:Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

Depressive symptoms:Patient Health Questionnaire-9, 9 items, self-report;Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Perceived Stress Scale(PSS-10)
時間枠:Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

Perceived stress:Perceived Stress Scale, 10 items, self-report;Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC-10)
時間枠:Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

Resilience :Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10, 10 items, self-report;Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better outcome

Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form(DERS-16)
時間枠:Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

Difficulties in emotion regulation:Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Brief, 16 items, self-report;Scores range from 16 to 80, with higher scores indicating worse outcome

Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)
時間枠:Baseline (T1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 (T2), 5, 6, 7 (during intervention), Week 8 immediately post-intervention (T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

The OASIS is a 5-item self-report measure designed to assess the frequency and severity of anxiety symptoms, as well as the extent of anxiety-related functional impairment and avoidance, over the past week. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater overall anxiety severity and impairment. The OASIS has demonstrated good reliability and validity in both clinical and nonclinical samples (Norman et al., 2006).

Baseline (T1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 (T2), 5, 6, 7 (during intervention), Week 8 immediately post-intervention (T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS)
時間枠:Baseline (T1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 (T2), 5, 6, 7 (during intervention), Week 8 immediately post-intervention (T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

The ODSIS is a 5-item self-report measure designed to assess the frequency and severity of depressive symptoms, as well as depression-related functional impairment and avoidance, over the past week. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater overall depression severity and impairment. The ODSIS has demonstrated good reliability and validity in both clinical and nonclinical samples (Bentley et al., 2014).

Baseline (T1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 (T2), 5, 6, 7 (during intervention), Week 8 immediately post-intervention (T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form(FFMQ-SF)
時間枠:Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

Mindfulness level:Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form, 20 items, self-report; Scores range from 0 to 5 for average item scores and 24-120 for total scores, with higher scores indicating better outcome

Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Process indicator - attendance rate
時間枠:Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)

attendance rate. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating better outcome.

Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)
Process indicator -homework completion rate
時間枠:Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)

Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating better outcome

Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)
Process indicator - dropout rate and reasons
時間枠:Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)

dropout rate and reasons: Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating worse outcome

Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)
Acceptability
時間枠:Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)

self-developed acceptability and satisfaction scale (adolescent/parent version, 1-5 Likert scale).with higher scores indicating better outcome

Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)
Adverse Event Records
時間枠:Baseline (T1); Week4 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8(T3); and1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

adverse event records (emotional deterioration, self-harm reports, number of crisis triggers);with more records indicating worse outcome

Baseline (T1); Week4 (T2) during the intervention; immediately post-intervention at Week 8(T3); and1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Xinghua Liu、Peking University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年11月6日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年3月31日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年3月31日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年11月4日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年11月5日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年11月12日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月12日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年11月5日

最終確認日

2026年11月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する