이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Interventions for Children With Attention and Reading Disorders (ICARD)

2017년 2월 27일 업데이트: Carolyn Denton, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Reading ICARD: Interventions for Children With Attention and Reading Disorders

The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to address unanswered questions about the relative effectiveness of treatments for children with both Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and significant reading difficulties (RD). The study evaluates attentional and word reading outcomes for students with both conditions when provided with either (a) ADHD treatment alone, (b) RD treatment alone, or (c) the combination of ADHD and RD treatment.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to address unanswered questions about the relative effectiveness of treatments for children with both Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and significant reading difficulties (RD). The study evaluates attentional and word reading outcomes for students with both conditions when provided with either (a) disorder-specific ADHD treatment (carefully managed medication + parent training), (b) disorder-specific RD treatment (intensive, individualized reading instruction), or (c) the combination of ADHD and RD treatment. The study aims to address the relative benefits of providing either disorder-specific ADHD or RD treatment alone and providing the combined treatment. The investigators hypothesize that the combined treatment approach will result in better outcomes in terms of both word reading/decoding and a reduction in ADHD symptoms than either of the disorder-specific treatments alone. Treatment will last for 16 weeks, with assessment prior to and following treatment and some measures collected regularly throughout the intervention periods.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

222

단계

  • 4단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

  • 미국
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, 미국, 45206
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, 미국, 77030
        • University of Texas Health Science Center

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

7년 (어린이)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Meet criteria for ADHD, Combined Type or ADHD, Predominantly Inattentive Type based on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, 4.0 (DISC) parent interview, Teacher baseline Swanson Nolan and Pelham Rating Scale (SNAP) endorses additional non-overlapping Inattentive symptoms with the parent DISC, which when combined with the parent ratings result in endorsement of 6 or more symptoms required for diagnosis by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.
  2. Have at least 4 symptoms of inattention rated "Often" or "Very Often" on the teacher version of the SNAP-IV.
  3. Have a standard score of 90 or lower on either the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement Letter-Word Identification or Word Attack Subtests, or on the Basic Reading Skills Cluster
  4. Attend a participating school in Grades 2-5
  5. Have at least one parent or guardian who understands English well enough to participate in the behavioral parent training intervention.
  6. Have a Full Scale OR Non-Verbal Intelligence Quotient (IQ) estimate higher than 70 based on the IQ Composite and Non-Verbal IQ estimate of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT-2).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any documented or suspected bipolar disorder, severe psychosis, or other severe emotional disturbance, developmental disability, or autism.
  2. Receipt of primary school reading instruction in a language other than English.
  3. A history or presence of cardiovascular problems that would contraindicate stimulant treatment.
  4. Chronic vocal tics.
  5. Children will be excluded if they are taking a concomitant medication that has the potential to significantly affect their ADHD symptoms, that would be contraindicated to take along with the study medication, or if they have not been on a stable dose of a psychotropic medication long enough to fully assess the clinical outcome or tolerability.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Intensive Reading Instruction
Specialized phonologically-based reading instruction provided by well-trained tutors either individually (one-on-one) or to groups of two students for 45 minutes, four days per week, for 16 weeks. The instructional approach includes an individualized combination of published programs targeting word reading and decoding; reading fluency; and reading comprehension.
행동: Intensive reading instruction
Individualized phonologically-based instruction delivered 4 days per week for 45 min. per day by a highly trained tutor.
실험적: ADHD Intervention
Carefully-managed medication and behavioral parent training. Medication treatment begins with a four-week titration period, beginning with a trial of methylphenidate. If benefit is insufficient or side effects are intolerable, the physician may initiate a trial of mixed salt amphetamine, followed by either Atomoxetine or Guanfacine. When the optimum medication and dosage is determined the child returns for monthly medication maintenance visits until the end of the 16-week intervention period. Parent training consists of nine group sessions provided by a psychologist addressing ADHD and its treatment, principals of behavior modification, and evidence-supported practices for managing behavior.
의약품: Methylphenidate
Appropriate dosage to be individually determined; daily for 16 weeks
다른 이름들:
  • 리탈린
  • Concerta Extended Release
행동: Parent Training
Nine sessions on parenting a child with ADHD
의약품: Mixed Salt Amphetamine
Appropriate dosage to be individually determined; daily for 16 weeks; prescribed only if child does not show a beneficial treatment response to Concerta
다른 이름들:
  • Adderall Extended Release (XR)
의약품: Atomoxetine
Appropriate dosage to be individually determined; daily for 16 weeks
다른 이름들:
  • 스트라테라
의약품: Guanfacine
Appropriate dosage to be individually determined; daily for 16 weeks
다른 이름들:
  • 인투니브
실험적: Combined ADHD and Reading Instruction

All interventions described in Reading Instruction and ADHD treatment arms:

Phonologically-based reading instruction provided for 45 minutes, four days per week, for 16 weeks. Carefully-managed medication and behavioral parent training. Medication treatment begins with a trial of methylphenidate. If benefit is insufficient or side effects are intolerable, the physician may initiate a trial of mixed salt amphetamine, followed by either Atomoxetine or Guanfacine. When the optimum medication and dosage is determined the child returns for monthly medication maintenance visits until the end of the 16-week intervention period. Parent training consists of nine group sessions on parenting a child with ADHD.
행동: Intensive reading instruction
Individualized phonologically-based instruction delivered 4 days per week for 45 min. per day by a highly trained tutor.
의약품: Methylphenidate
Appropriate dosage to be individually determined; daily for 16 weeks
다른 이름들:
  • 리탈린
  • Concerta Extended Release
행동: Parent Training
Nine sessions on parenting a child with ADHD
의약품: Mixed Salt Amphetamine
Appropriate dosage to be individually determined; daily for 16 weeks; prescribed only if child does not show a beneficial treatment response to Concerta
다른 이름들:
  • Adderall Extended Release (XR)
의약품: Atomoxetine
Appropriate dosage to be individually determined; daily for 16 weeks
다른 이름들:
  • 스트라테라
의약품: Guanfacine
Appropriate dosage to be individually determined; daily for 16 weeks
다른 이름들:
  • 인투니브

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Inattention
기간: 16 weeks (end of Active Treatment phase), and follow-up
Rating Scale of ADHD symptomology completed by parents and teachers. Raters evaluate how well each DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) ADHD symptom describes a child on a four-point Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Just a little, 2=Quite a bit, 3=Very much). The measure shows adequate internal consistency (.94) and test-retest reliability (Bussing et al., 2008; Gau et al., 2008).
16 weeks (end of Active Treatment phase), and follow-up
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivity
기간: 16 weeks (end of Active Treatment phase), and follow-up
Rating Scale of ADHD symptomology completed by parents and teachers. Raters evaluate how well each DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) ADHD symptom describes a child on a four-point Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Just a little, 2=Quite a bit, 3=Very much). The measure shows adequate internal consistency (.94) and test-retest reliability (Bussing et al., 2008; Gau et al., 2008).
16 weeks (end of Active Treatment phase), and follow-up
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Teacher Rating of Inattention
기간: Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Rating Scale of ADHD symptomology completed by parents and teachers. Raters evaluate how well each DSM-IV ADHD symptom describes a child on a four-point Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Just a little, 2=Quite a bit, 3=Very much). The measure shows adequate internal consistency (.94) and test-retest reliability (Bussing et al., 2008; Gau et al., 2008).
Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Teacher Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivity
기간: Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Rating Scale of ADHD symptomology completed by parents and teachers. Raters evaluate how well each DSM-IV ADHD symptom describes a child on a four-point Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Just a little, 2=Quite a bit, 3=Very much). The measure shows adequate internal consistency (.94) and test-retest reliability (Bussing et al., 2008; Gau et al., 2008).
Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Word Reading Subtest
기간: Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
The WIAT-III is an individually-administered test of academic achievement. In the Word Reading subtest students read a list of increasingly difficult words. Scores reported here are standardized scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15.
Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Pseudoword Decoding Subtest
기간: Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
The WIAT-III is an individually-administered test of academic achievement. In the Pseudoword Decoding subtest students read a list of increasingly difficult nonsense words as a test of their ability to use phonics to decode unknown words. Scores reported here are standardized scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Reading Comprehension Subtest
기간: Week 16, End of Active Treatment Phase
The WIAT-III is an individually-administered test of academic achievement. This subtest involves reading sentences and longer passages and then answering a set of literal and inferential comprehension questions about the text. Scores reported here are standardized scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Week 16, End of Active Treatment Phase
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Oral Reading Fluency Subtest (DIBELS ORF)
기간: Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
DIBELS ORF measures oral reading fluency in connected text. Students are presented with a passage on their grade level to read orally, and the score is the number of words of the passage read correctly in a one-minute period. Students in this study read two passages at each test administration, and the mean score for the two passages was the dependent variable analyzed. A research synthesis of studies reporting psychometric properties for DIBELS ORF determined that reliability coefficients in these studies exceeded .80 and that the measure demonstrated moderate to high concurrent and predictive validity across studies (Goffreda & DiPerna, 2010).
Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) - Sight Word Efficiency
기간: Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
The TOWRE Sight Word Efficiency subtest measures fluency of reading words in lists. The raw score is the number of words or nonwords identified correctly in 45 seconds. Standard scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviaion of 15 are reported here. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) - Phonemic Decoding Efficiency
기간: Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
The TOWRE Phonemic Decoding Efficiency measures the student's fluent decoding of nonsense words that follow the spelling rules of the English language. The raw score is the number of nonwords identified correctly in 45 seconds. Standardized scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviaion of 15 are reported here. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Test of Silent Reading Fluency and Comprehension (TOSREC)
기간: Week 16, End of Active Treatment Phase
The TOSREC measures sentence-level comprehension and silent reading fluency. It is a sentence verification task; children are presented with a list of sentences and must tell whether they are true or false. Items are based on common knowledge (e.g., All apples are blue). The raw score is the number of items answered correctly in 3 minutes. Standardized with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15 are reported here. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Week 16, End of Active Treatment Phase

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

협력자

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Carolyn A Denton, Ph.D., The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2010년 11월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2015년 6월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2015년 6월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2010년 5월 26일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2010년 5월 28일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2010년 5월 31일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2017년 4월 11일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2017년 2월 27일

마지막으로 확인됨

2017년 2월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • HSC-MS-09-0531
  • R01HD060617 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다