- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT01383174
Nuevo Amanecer: Promoting the Psychosocial Health of Latinas
연구 개요
상세 설명
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
California
-
Multiple Locations, California, 미국
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Self-identifies as Latina
- Diagnosed with Stage 0, I, II, or III in the prior month
- Primarily Spanish-speaking, or Spanish monolingual
- Aged 18 or older
- Diagnosed in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, San Francisco or Santa Clara counties, California.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous cancer diagnosis except for non-melanoma skin cancer
- Terminal illness
- Stage IV breast cancer (distant metastasis)
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 지지 요법
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Peer Support Program
Nuevo Amanecer is the peer support program.
Participants receive the peer support program as soon as possible after randomization.
|
다른 이름들:
|
|
간섭 없음: Wait-list Control
Waits six months, and at the end of the six months is offered the option of participating in the peer support program.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Well-being a Subcale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: physical well-being subscale. Of 7 items, 1 was dropped because it was conceptually different from other items on that scale. Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for physical well-being were 0-24. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Social/Family Well-being a Subcale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: social/family well-being subscale. Of 7 items, 2 were dropped because the items were conditional on having a partner (resulting in lots of missing data). Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for social/family well-being were 0-20. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Emotional Well-being a Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: emotional well-being subscale. Of 6 items, 1 was dropped because of low item-scale correlations and it was conceptually different from the other items on that scale (only positively worded item on the scale). Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for emotional well-being were 0-20. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Breast Cancer Concerns a Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: breast cancer concerns subscale. Of 7 items, 2 were dropped because of low item-scale correlations and were conceptually different from the other items on that scale. Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for emotional well-being were 0-28. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Enjoyment of Life a Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to FACT-B: functional well-being subscale. Of 7 items, 3 were dropped because items were conceptually different and did not converge psychometrically with the other items on that scale; the remaining 4 items were specific to enjoyment of life, thus we renamed the subscale to "Enjoyment of Life". Modified subscale was scored by summing items. Possible score ranges for enjoyment of life were 0-16. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
FACT-B was used as the breast cancer-specific quality-of-life measure. FACT-B consists of 5 subscale scores pertaining to 4 well-being dimensions (physical, social-family, emotional, functional) and additional breast cancer concerns. A total overall score is the sum of all subscales. Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. Psychometric analysis in our Spanish-speaking Latina sample resulted in modifications to each of the FACT-B subscale. The total overall score is based on the sum of modified subscales (see above primary outcomes for modifications to subscales). Possible score ranges for the total overall score were 0-108. Higher scores indicated greater well-being. |
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Anxiety a Subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
BSI was used to measure general symptoms of distress.
BSI consists of 3 scale scores pertaining to general symptoms of distress (anxiety, depression, somatization).
Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, and 4=extremely.
Scores were the mean of nonmissing items.
Possible score ranges for anxiety were 0-4.
Higher scores indicated more distress.
|
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Depression a Subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
BSI was used to measure general symptoms of distress.
BSI consists of 3 scale scores pertaining to general symptoms of distress (anxiety, depression, somatization).
Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, and 4=extremely.
Scores were the mean of nonmissing items.
Possible score ranges for depression were 0-4.
Higher scores indicated more distress.
|
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Somatization a Subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
BSI was used to measure general symptoms of distress.
BSI consists of 3 scale scores pertaining to general symptoms of distress (anxiety, depression, somatization).
Response options were 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, and 4=extremely.
Scores were the mean of nonmissing items.
Possible score ranges for somatization were 0-4.
Higher scores indicated more distress.
|
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
|
Breast Cancer-Specific Distress of the Intrusive Thoughts Scale
기간: Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
Breast cancer-specific distress was measured with the 7 item Intrusive Thoughts Scale (anchored to the breast cancer experience), a subscale of the revised Impact of Event Scale (RIES).
Response options were 0=not at all, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, and 3=often.
Using the published scoring algorithm, items were summed after recoding responses to 0, 1, 3, and 5. Possible score ranges were 0-35.
Higher scores indicate greater distress.
|
Baseline and 6 month assessment
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Steven Gregorich, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Bonilla J, Alhomsi A, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Ortiz C, Samayoa C, Torres-Nguyen A, Palomino H, Coleman V, Urias A, Gonzalez N, Cervantes SA, Duron Y, Napoles AM. Sharing research results with Latina breast cancer survivors who participated in a community-engaged behavioral RCT study: a descriptive cross-sectional survey study. Trials. 2022 Jan 8;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05945-8.
- Bonilla J, Escalera C, Santoyo-Olsson J, Samayoa C, Ortiz C, Stewart AL, Napoles AM. The importance of patient engagement to quality of breast cancer care and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study among Latina breast cancer survivors in rural and urban communities. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Feb 9;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01200-z.
- Chacon L, Santoyo-Olsson J, Samayoa C, Alhomsi A, Stewart AL, Ortiz C, Escalera C, Napoles AM. Self-Efficacy for Coping with Breast Cancer Treatment Among Spanish-Speaking Latinas. Health Equity. 2021 Apr 26;5(1):245-252. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0152. eCollection 2021.
- Napoles AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Ortiz C, Garcia-Jimenez M. Evaluating the Implementation of a Translational Peer-Delivered Stress Management Program for Spanish-Speaking Latina Breast Cancer Survivors. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):875-884. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1202-y.
- Napoles AM, Ortiz C, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Gregorich S, Lee HE, Duron Y, McGuire P, Luce J. Nuevo Amanecer: results of a randomized controlled trial of a community-based, peer-delivered stress management intervention to improve quality of life in Latinas with breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e55-63. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302598. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
- Napoles AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, Ortiz C, Gregorich S, Lee HE, Duron Y, Graves K, Luce JA, McGuire P, Diaz-Mendez M, Stewart AL. Randomized controlled trial of Nuevo Amanecer: a peer-delivered stress management intervention for Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer. Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):230-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774514521906. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (추정)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .