이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Imaging Stimulant and Non Stimulant Treatments for ADHD: A Network Based Approach

2020년 7월 7일 업데이트: Jeffrey Newcorn, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
The growing number of medications used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) raises important questions about whether different medications have similar or different therapeutic mechanisms of action. We have recently shown that the stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) and the non-stimulant atomoxetine (ATX) produce clinical improvement via a common mechanism in motor cortex, and distinct actions in frontostriatal and midline cingulate-precuneus regions. These exciting findings offer a window into the common and unique neurophysiological mechanisms of response to stimulant and non-stimulant treatments. However, the interpretation and clinical utility of these results would be greatly enhanced by in-depth investigation of the impact of the two treatments on relevant neural networks, and analyses which evaluate whether improvement is achieved via normalization or other adaptive changes in brain function.

연구 개요

상세 설명

The specific aims of this project are to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine the significance of activation changes over treatment related to clinical improvement, and the impact of treatment on neural connectivity within and between the anti-correlated frontostriatal 'task-positive' circuit and cingulate-precuneus 'task-negative' network. Our central hypotheses are that clinical improvement is associated with: (i) normalization of reduced connectivity of regions within the 'task-positive' network, with resultant increased inhibition of motor cortex, and (ii) normalization of low task-related connectivity in regions within the task-negative network for MPH and the 'task-positive' network for ATX.

This research proposes to test a model which posits a neurophysiological basis of mechanisms of response to stimulant and non-stimulant medications, and fits with our long term objectives of being able to match treatments to individual patients. Testing this model requires large samples of youth scanned using fMRI before and after treatment, and matched healthy controls also scanned twice. We will use an innovative network-based approach to study the effects of treatment, building on results from our current fMRI treatment study, and incorporating new theoretical approaches to understanding ADHD and its treatment.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

127

단계

  • 4단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • New York
      • New York, New York, 미국, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

7년 (어린이)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

General inclusion criteria for subjects with ADHD and healthy controls are:

  • aged 7-17 years;
  • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) scores ≥ 75;
  • informed consent and assent to study participation.

Specific inclusion criteria for youth with ADHD are:

  • diagnosis of ADHD, any subtype, determined by Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children-Present and Lifetime Versions (K-SADS-PL);
  • ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator Administered (ADHD-RSIV) total score ≥ 1.5 SD above age and gender means for subtype
  • Clinical Global Impressions-ADHD-Severity (CGI-S) score > 4;
  • ADHD must be the primary diagnosis and focus of treatment, and the treatments offered in the study must not be contraindicated for the comorbid disorder.

Exclusion Criteria:

General exclusion criteria are:

  • history of head injury with loss of consciousness or any CNS disease that is likely to affect brain function;
  • diagnosis of autism or pervasive developmental, psychotic, major mood, and Tourette's disorder;
  • alcohol or drug abuse in the past 3 months or a positive urinary toxic screen on initial evaluation;
  • use of psychotropic medication within 2 weeks of the study (8 weeks for fluoxetine);
  • pre-existing medical or psychological condition which precludes being in the scanner (e.g., claustrophobia, morbid obesity);
  • metal in the body that precludes scanning (e.g., braces, metal plate);
  • positive urine pregnancy test.

Specific exclusion criteria for the treatment trial include:

  • previous unsuccessful trial of MPH or ATX that was adequately dosed (≥ 1 mg/kg for MPH or 1.0 mg/kg for ATX) and of adequate duration (≥ 4 weeks);
  • abnormal findings on physical exam, or vital signs
  • pulse and blood pressure > 95% of age and gender mean;
  • inability to swallow capsules;
  • weight is < 20 kg or > 85 kg.

Specific exclusion criteria for control youth include:

  • no past history or current diagnosis of any psychiatric disorder, determined by the K-SADS-PL interview;
  • ADHD-RS-IV and CBCL scores for each symptom domain ≤ 1 SD of age and gender means.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 네 배로

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: fMRI scans
Healthy Control Group: will receive initial evaluation, and 2 fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) scans each 6-8 weeks apart
2 fMRI scans 6-8 weeks apart
실험적: Atomoxetine arm
These subjects will receive initial evaluation and baseline fMRI scan, flexible dose titration with atomoxetine for 6-8 weeks, and fMRI postscan, with optional post study stabilization visits.
2 fMRI scans 6-8 weeks apart
Flexible dose titration with atomoxetine prescribed at weekly visits for 6-8 weeks
다른 이름들:
  • 스트라테라
  • ATX
실험적: Methylphenidate arm
Subjects will receive initial evaluation, baseline fMRI scan, flexible dose titration with methylphenidate (Concerta) for 6-8 weeks, and fMRI scan post treatment.
2 fMRI scans 6-8 weeks apart
Flexible dose titration with methylphenidate for 6-8 weeks, with optional post study stabilization visits.
다른 이름들:
  • 콘체르타
  • MPH

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Percentage of Correct Inhibition in Participants Assessed With the Go-No go Task
기간: Baseline and at 6 weeks
Comparison of Go-Nogo at 6 weeks from baseline. Performance on a go-nogo task inside the scanner (fMRI). In the go/no-go task, participants respond to certain stimuli ("go" stimuli) and make no response for others ("no-go" stimuli).
Baseline and at 6 weeks

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (ADHD-RS)
기간: 8 weeks
ADHD-RS is an 18-item list of core ADHD symptoms, each item are scored on a 4-point scale from 0-3, with total 0-54, with higher score indicating more symptoms.
8 weeks
Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S)
기간: up to 6 weeks
a clinician rated measure of symptom severity. CGI-S is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill.
up to 6 weeks
Response Time in Attention Networks Test (ANT)
기간: baseline and at 6 weeks
A neuropsychological assessment of attention compared at 6 weeks from baseline by looking at response time. The ANT is a task designed to test three attentional networks in children and adults: alerting, orienting, and executive control. The response time were summed.
baseline and at 6 weeks
Continuous Performance Test (CPT)
기간: baseline and at 6 weeks
A neuropsychological assessment of attention compared at 6 weeks from baseline. CPT is a task-oriented computerized assessment of attention-related problems.This score indicates the number of times the client responded but no target was presented. A fast reaction time and high commission error rate points to difficulties with impulsivity. A slow reaction time with high commission and omission errors, indicates inattention in general. Scores are compared with the normative scores for the age, group and gender of the person being tested and represented as a commissioned T-score. The T-score indicates the degree to which performance in CPT task is higher or lower than the performance of a healthy individual matched in age. A T-score of 50 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values are indicative of more attention-related problems.
baseline and at 6 weeks
Digit Span
기간: baseline and at 6 weeks
A cognitive/neuropsychological measure of auditory/verbal working memory compared at 6 weeks from baseline. Digit Span. Memory span is the longest list of items that a person can repeat back in correct order immediately after presentation on 50% of all trials. Items may include words, numbers, or letters. The task is known as digit span when numbers are used. Memory span is a common measure of short-term memory. A digit-span task is used to measure working memory's number storage capacity.The item score is the sum of the scores on the two trials for that item (range=0-2). The total raw score for backwards digit span is the sum of the item scores; maximum backwards digit span total raw score is 0-16 points. Higher score indicates better health outcomes.
baseline and at 6 weeks
Finger Windows
기간: baseline and at 6 weeks
A neuropsychological measure of motor skill and visual-spatial working memory compared at 6 weeks from baseline. The Finger Windows subtest is a measure of nonverbal, rote sequential recall. scaled scores ranging from 1 to 19, with higher score indicating better attention or concentration.
baseline and at 6 weeks

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Kurt Schulz, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2012년 10월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2018년 4월 30일

연구 완료 (실제)

2018년 4월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2012년 8월 30일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2012년 8월 30일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2012년 9월 3일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 7월 24일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2020년 7월 7일

마지막으로 확인됨

2020년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다