이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Single Fraction Elderly Breast Irradiation (SiFEBI) (SIFEBI)

2021년 11월 3일 업데이트: Centre Antoine Lacassagne

A Phase I-II Trial Evaluating the Toxicity of Early Breast Partial Irradiation in Patients Aged at Least of 70 Years With Breast Cancer at Low Risk of Local Recurrence

Irradiation and Accelerated Partial Breast (IPAS) to this day remains a therapeutic concept whose validity is being assessed on its non-inferiority in terms of local control compared to whole breast irradiation. At least eight phase III trials attempting to answer this question and thus provide a sufficient level of evidence to make this concept a new standard of care for sub-groups of patients well defined (1).

However, without waiting for the final results of these randomized trials (which will not be fully valid with a drop of at least ten years), the American societies (ASTRO) and European (ESTRO) radiotherapy have all two proposed classification (very similar) into 3 groups according to the risk to the patient in terms of local recurrence after IPAS. And are defined by the ESTRO:

  • The low-risk group ("suitable" for ASTRO)
  • The intermediate-risk group ("cautionary" in ASTRO)
  • The high-risk group ("not suitable" for ASTRO) (2.3). Therefore, it is possible to propose to a patient a randomized clinical tria IPAS, to subject it belongs to the group "low risk." The results of phase II trials as a long-term analysis of the matched team of William Beaumont Hospital (4) and the phase III trial using intra-operative radiation photons in low energy X whose results were recently published (5) confirm the value of this new therapeutic concept for post-operative breast cancer at low risk of local recurrence.

In France, the therapists were quickly directed to a sub-population for which the IPAS could represent a real improvement in the therapeutic management in significantly reducing the number of irradiation sessions of thirty in 6 weeks 5 days at 10 in a single view (6). Several French phase II trials were started specifically targeting the female population aged using a balloon catheter (MammoSite ®) (7) or by intra-operative radiation électronthérapie (8). The results of the test using the GERICO-03 brachytherapy with high dose rate (promoter: FNCLCC, National Federation of Anti Cancer Centres , recently merged into Group Health Cooperation entitled UNICANCER) are currently submitted to Journal Green Radiotherapy (Radiotherapy and Oncology from 09/11/11) (9).

On a technical level, two main approaches are used (10):

  • Irradiation intraoperative electron or low-energy photons,
  • Radiation after surgery The advantage of intraoperative irradiation is the optimal reduction of total processing time radio-surgery because the patient is irradiated during the lumpectomy. However, 15-20% of these patients receive partial breast irradiation, as histo-prognostic criteria provided in the histologically final report, confirm the non-adapted indication of IPAS (5).

In contrast, the post-operative IPAS can treat only patients meeting all criteria for IPAS but treatment-related travel are about 5 treatments for bi-fractionated (2 sessions per days separated by at least 6 hours).

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Single dose intraoperative issued by electrontherapy or low energy photons (50 Kv) is 21 Gy (5.11). However, these doses reported in the irradiated volume are not equivalent. Indeed, with electrontherapy, it is a complete volume of mammary parenchyma that is irradiated, whereas with low energy photon therapy (X 50 KV) is a "shell" of 5 mm thick which is treated knowing that to 10 mm from the surface of the sphere of treatment, the gland received only 50% of the dose initially prescribed. On interstitial brachytherapy with high dose rate, it has a dose escalation due to intrinsic volumes located within the irradiated area that will receive a higher dose than prescribed (12). It is this variation in dose within the target volume which can be efficiency, but also which can induce the toxicity of interstitial brachytherapy. The linear quadratic model to calculate the biological equivalence of 2 Gy irradiation scheme most often hypofractionned, is theoretically applicable for doses per fraction less than 8 Gy. Nevertheless, the authors using the IPAS intra-operative (electrons, photons) apply this method of calculation for doses of 21 Gy in one fraction.

In our study, we propose to treat these patients with a total dose of 16 Gy in one fraction. This dose is calculated taking into account a report alpha/beta for the breast, on the order of 3.4 Gy for late toxicity and 4.6 Gy for local control (13). Applying the linear-quadratic model with alpha/beta for the breast of 4, 16 Gy in one fraction is calculated as radio-biologically equivalent to 53 Gy in conventional fractionation (14,15). Biological Equivalence of this dose is between the dose in the protocols IPAS intraoperative electron or X-ray photons of 50 kV (21 Gy in one fraction, 87 Gy EQD2 alpha/beta 4.6) (5.8) and the post-operative irradiation of 34-38 Gy in 10 fractions, 5 days (42 Gy EQD2 alpha/beta 4.6.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

37

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Nice, 프랑스, 06189
        • Centre Antoine Lacassagne

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

70년 이상 (고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

여성

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient WITHinvasive breast cancer histologically proved: ductal, lobular, medullary, papillary, tubular or colloid:

    • All grades histo-prognostic
    • pT1 tumor size (<20 mm),
    • healthy Margins surgical
    • unifocal lesion
    • Any hormone receptor,
    • Any Her2 status,
    • No lymph node (sentinel lymphadenectomy or) or micrometastases (pN0, pN1mic)
  • Age greater than or equal to 70 years
  • Score Balducci I or II,
  • Karnofsky index greater than or equal to 70%
  • Time between lumpectomy and radiation less than 2 weeks
  • Implementation of clips in the tumor bed intraoperatively,
  • Patient having taken note of the information note and who signed the informed consent
  • Patient receiving social security coverage.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lobular carcinoma in situ or pure ductal carcinoma in situ or non-epithelial tumor type sarcoma or lymphoma,
  • Component extensive ductal in situ associated
  • Peritumoral lymphatic emboli,
  • Distance Metastasis
  • Inflammatory Breast Cancer,
  • Multifocal tumor (covering a total distance inter-end of 40 mm or more)
  • Previous treatment for this tumor including breast radiotherapy and / or chemotherapy neoadjuvant or adjuvant
  • History of plastic surgery breast
  • Unknown or safety margins positive for invasive carcinoma
  • Absence of clips in the tumor bed,
  • Time between lumpectomy and radiation greater than or equal to 2 weeks
  • Active infection or other serious comorbidity that could prevent the patient receiving the treatment,
  • History of cancer other than a basal cell skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or other cancer in complete remission for more than 5 years
  • Psychiatric illness

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: IPAS
Once the patient recorded in the trial, and after completion of a post-implant dosimetry scanner to analyze the dose distribution within the target volume and organs at risk, the patient is treated by irradiation and partial accelerated breast brachytherapy using high dose rate, delivering a total dose of 16 Gy in one fraction
다른 이름들:
  • irradiation and partial accelerated breast brachytherapy

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Rate of Acute Toxicity Within 180 Days of IPAS Mono Split Postoperatively in Patients Aged at Least of 70 Years With Breast Cancer at Low Risk of Local Recurrence (Low Risk Group of ESTRO IPAS Classification ESTRO)
기간: 180 days

Rate of acute toxicity evaluated by a clinical examination, in consultation with the radiotherapist to 30, 90 days and 180 days.

Common Toxicity Criteria classification for Adverse Events (CTCAE) in its fourth version is used.

180 days

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Evaluation of the Quality of Life
기간: 180 days
Analysis of the impact on self assessment by onco-geriatric aesthetic result evaluation Dosimetric data analysis in order to propose dose constraints for future inverse planning
180 days

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Jean-Michel HANNOUN LEVI, Phd, Centre Antoine Lacassagne

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

유용한 링크

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2012년 11월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2014년 6월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2015년 11월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2012년 11월 12일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2012년 11월 12일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2012년 11월 15일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 12월 17일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2021년 11월 3일

마지막으로 확인됨

2021년 11월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 2012/09 - SIFEBI
  • 2012-A00745-38 (레지스트리 식별자: 2012-A00745-38)

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다