이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Sustainability of Pulmonary Rehab Gains

2019년 9월 11일 업데이트: VA Office of Research and Development

Sustainability of Rehabilitation Gains in COPD

People with moderate to severe COPD trap air in their lungs. This lessens their ability to exercise. The investigators developed a computerized breathing retraining program to help patients empty their lungs during exercise. The investigators believe that learning to control breathing will help patients be more active. The purpose of this study is to test the effects of using breathing retraining (intervention group) versus no breathing retraining (control group) as part of a 12-week exercise program. The investigators are examining the long term effects of this training on exercise capacity and the ability to empty ones lungs during exercise. Patients will participate in a 12-week exercise program, with or without breathing retraining. They will then participate in a 42 week adherence program to maintain physical activity. Patient testing will be competed at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. 250 patients with moderate to severe COPD will be enrolled.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Rationale: Development of dynamic hyperinflation is a primary limiting factor of exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To lessen the development of dynamic hyperinflation, and to improve exercise tolerance in COPD patients, the investigators have developed a breathing-retraining technique to be used during pulmonary rehabilitation. This breathing-retraining technique is designed to decrease respiratory rate and prolong exhalation. The investigators demonstrated that, in the short-term, hyperinflation and exercise duration improved more with breathing-retraining plus exercise-training than with exercise-training alone. Because a crucial aspect of pulmonary rehabilitation is the maintenance its short-term benefits over the long-term, the investigators now propose to test whether short-term benefits of breathing-retraining plus exercise followed by an adherence-intervention program are sustainable over the long-term Primary Hypothesis: (H1) In COPD patients, improvements in exercise duration on a constant- load treadmill test will be greater after 12 weeks of breathing-retraining plus exercise-training followed by a 42-week adherence-intervention program (1 yr. total) than after 12 weeks of exercise-training alone followed by a 42-week adherence-intervention program (1 yr. total). Secondary Hypotheses: One year after randomization, exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation will be less during a constant-load treadmill test (H2), 6-minute walking distance will be longer (H3), and mastery over breathing will be greater (H4) in the breathing-retraining plus exercise-training group than in the exercise-alone group. Lastly (exploratory objective), the investigators will assess the effect of the patient's physiologic, psychologic and clinical phenotype on short- term and long-term responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation.

Methods: The proposed study is a randomized, controlled clinical trial in which 250 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD will be enrolled. One hundred forty of these patients are expected to qualify for randomization into the breathing-retraining plus exercise-training group or the exercise-training alone group. Patients will receive 12-weeks of supervised training according to group assignment (three times weekly) followed by an adherence-intervention program (weekly phone motivational interviews, home-exercise program, and monthly laboratory booster sessions). Follow-up testing will be completed at 12 weeks, and at 6 and 12 months. Testing will include pulmonary function test, incremental-load and constant-load treadmill tests, 6-minute walk test, measurements of dyspnea, assessment of respiratory and quadriceps muscle strength and endurance and quadriceps ultrasonography. Analysis: In the principal analysis of the primary outcome measure (exercise duration; H1) the investigators will compare changes in exercise duration (constant work-rate treadmill test) from baseline to end of study using 2-sample t-test (two-tailed =.05). The primary analysis will be based on intention-to-treat principles. Multiple imputation will be used for study subjects missing the 12-month measurement. This imputation model will be based on baseline characteristics of study participants. Several secondary analyses of the primary outcome measure will be performed (H2-H4). Linear regression will be used to determine whether the observed treatment benefits persist after adjustment for baseline covariates and measures of adherence to treatment. Since several measurements will be taken on each patient, mixed-models analysis will be used to compare the changes on the constant-load treadmill test over time between the two groups.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

80

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Illinois
      • Hines, Illinois, 미국, 60141-5000
        • Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

40년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >/= 40 yrs
  • FEV1 </= 70% predicted
  • FEV1/FVC <70% predicted
  • RV/TLC >/=120%
  • SpO2 >/= 90% at peak exercise (with or without exercise)
  • inspiratory capacity decline >.15L from rest to peak exercise

Exclusion Criteria:

  • respiratory infection/exacerbation within the previous 4 weeks
  • exercise limiting heart disease
  • primary asthma
  • congestive heart failure
  • exercise limiting peripheral arterial disease
  • stops exercise due to arthritic pain in the knee or hips
  • inability to walk on the treadmill
  • pregnancy
  • methadone use
  • any unforeseen illness or disability that would preclude exercise testing or training
  • participation in a formal exercise program within the previous 12 weeks

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 요인 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: exercise
Patients will exercise for 12 weeks and then participate in an adherence program
Patients will participate in a 12-week exercise program . They will also participate in an adherence program.
실험적: exercise plus breathing retraining
Patients will exercise plus breathing retraining for 12 weeks and then participate in an adherence program
Patients will participate in a 12-week exercise program with breathing retraining. They will also participate in an adherence program.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Duration of Exercise Time on a Constant Work-rate Treadmill Test
기간: 52 week test
Patients walk on a treadmill set at a constant workrate. The difference in the time walked on the treadmill from baseline to study completion is the primary outcome measure.
52 week test

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Inspiratory Capacity
기간: 52 week test
Inspiratory capacity is measured at a set time during the constant workrate treadmill test. The difference between the inspiratory capacity measured at baseline and 52 weeks is a secondary outcome. Inspiratory capacity measured during exercise is a measure of dynamic hyperinflation.
52 week test
6 Minute Walk Distance
기간: 52 weeks
Six-minute walk distance will be measured at 52 weeks. The difference in distance walked in meters between baseline and 52 weeks is the secondary outcome measure. The 6 minute walk is conducted using the guidelines issued by the American Thoracic Society.
52 weeks
Mastery Over Breathing
기간: 52 weeks
Mastery over breathing is measured using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. Specifically the subscale 'mastery" is the investigators' secondary outcome. The difference in scores from baseline to 52 weeks is the investigators' outcome measure. The Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire is a valid and reliable questionnaire. 1=minimum score, 7=maximum with the higher score indicating greater mastery. A higher score indicates better health. A change of 0.5 indicates a small change, 1.0 indicates a moderate change and greater or equal to a change of 1.5 indicates a large change.
52 weeks

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Eileen G. Collins, PhD RN, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2014년 10월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2018년 10월 21일

연구 완료 (실제)

2019년 8월 12일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2014년 9월 12일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2014년 9월 12일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2014년 9월 16일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2019년 10월 3일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2019년 9월 11일

마지막으로 확인됨

2019년 9월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • O1325-R

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

미국에서 제조되어 미국에서 수출되는 제품

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다