이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Long-term Safety of Dupilumab (REGN668/SAR231893) in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis (CHRONOS)

2017년 10월 12일 업데이트: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate the efficacy of Dupilumab administered concomitantly with topical corticosteroid (TCS) through Week 16 in adult participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) compared to placebo administered concomitantly with TCS.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

740

단계

  • 3단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

  • 네덜란드
      • Groningen, 네덜란드
      • Utrecht, 네덜란드
    • Noord-Brabant
      • Breda, Noord-Brabant, 네덜란드
    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, 네덜란드
    • Zuid-Holland
      • Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, 네덜란드
  • 뉴질랜드
      • Auckland, 뉴질랜드
    • South Island
      • Dunedin, South Island, 뉴질랜드
  • 대한민국
      • Seodaemun-gu, 대한민국
      • Uijeongbu-si, 대한민국
    • Gyeonggido
      • Bucheon-si, Gyeonggido, 대한민국
      • Suwon, Gyeonggido, 대한민국
    • Seoul Teugbyeolsi
      • Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 대한민국
  • 루마니아
    • Braşov
      • Brasov, Braşov, 루마니아
    • Bucureşti
      • Bucuresti, Bucureşti, 루마니아
    • Cluj
      • Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, 루마니아
    • Dolj
      • Craiova, Dolj, 루마니아
    • Mureş
      • Targu Mures, Mureş, 루마니아
  • 미국
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, 미국
    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, 미국
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, 미국
    • California
      • Encinitas, California, 미국
      • Oceanside, California, 미국
      • Palmdale, California, 미국
      • San Diego, California, 미국
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, 미국
      • Trumbull, Connecticut, 미국
    • Florida
      • Edgewater, Florida, 미국
      • Lake Worth, Florida, 미국
      • Miami Lakes, Florida, 미국
      • Orlando, Florida, 미국
      • Tampa, Florida, 미국
    • Georgia
      • Alpharetta, Georgia, 미국
      • Columbus, Georgia, 미국
      • Savannah, Georgia, 미국
    • Illinois
      • West Dundee, Illinois, 미국
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, 미국
      • New Albany, Indiana, 미국
    • Maryland
      • Rockville, Maryland, 미국
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, 미국
      • Bay City, Michigan, 미국
    • Minnesota
      • Edina, Minnesota, 미국
      • Fridley, Minnesota, 미국
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, 미국
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, 미국
    • Nevada
      • Henderson, Nevada, 미국
    • New Jersey
      • Verona, New Jersey, 미국
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, 미국
    • New York
      • Corning, New York, 미국
      • New York, New York, 미국
      • Smithtown, New York, 미국
      • Stony Brook, New York, 미국
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, 미국
    • Oklahoma
      • Norman, Oklahoma, 미국
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 미국
    • Oregon
      • Lake Oswego, Oregon, 미국
      • Portland, Oregon, 미국
    • Pennsylvania
      • Exton, Pennsylvania, 미국
      • Hazleton, Pennsylvania, 미국
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 미국
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, 미국
      • Dallas, Texas, 미국
    • Utah
      • West Jordan, Utah, 미국
    • Vermont
      • South Burlington, Vermont, 미국
    • Virginia
      • Henrico, Virginia, 미국
      • Norfolk, Virginia, 미국
      • Richmond, Virginia, 미국
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, 미국
  • 스페인
      • Alicante, 스페인
      • Madrid, 스페인
    • Cataluña
      • Barcelona, Cataluña, 스페인
  • 영국
      • Liverpool, 영국
      • Manchester, 영국
      • Reading, 영국
      • Salford, 영국
    • Angus
      • Dundee, Angus, 영국
    • Birmingham
      • Edgbaston, Birmingham, 영국
    • Glasgow City
      • Glasgow, Glasgow City, 영국
    • Kent
      • Sidcup, Kent, 영국
    • Middlesex
      • Northwood, Middlesex, 영국
  • 이탈리아
      • Ancona, 이탈리아
      • Bologna, 이탈리아
      • Brescia, 이탈리아
      • Novara, 이탈리아
      • Pavia, 이탈리아
      • Perugia, 이탈리아
      • Roma, 이탈리아
  • 일본
      • Fukuoka, 일본
    • Fukuoka
      • Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 일본
    • Hyôgo
      • Amagasaki, Hyôgo, 일본
    • Kanagawa
      • Yokohama, Kanagawa, 일본
    • Kumamoto
      • Kamimashiki-gun, Kumamoto, 일본
    • Saitama
      • Saitama-shi, Saitama, 일본
    • Shizuoka
      • Yaizu, Shizuoka, 일본
    • Tokyo
      • Koto-ku, Tokyo, 일본
      • Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 일본
    • Tôkyô
      • Adachi-ku, Tôkyô, 일본
      • Chiyoda-ku, Tôkyô, 일본
      • Nakano-ku, Tôkyô, 일본
      • Nerima-ku, Tôkyô, 일본
      • Shibuya-ku, Tôkyô, 일본
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tôkyô, 일본
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tôkyô, 일본
      • Suginami-ku, Tôkyô, 일본
  • 체코
      • Hradec Kralove, 체코
      • Nachod, 체코
      • Praha 10, 체코
      • Praha 5, 체코
      • Svitavy, 체코
      • Usti nad Labem, 체코
  • 캐나다
      • Quebec, 캐나다
    • British Columbia
      • Surrey, British Columbia, 캐나다
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, 캐나다
    • Ontario
      • Ajax, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Barrie, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Hamilton, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Markham, Ontario, 캐나다
      • North Bay, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Oakville, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Ottawa, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Peterborough, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Richmond Hill, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Toronto, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Waterloo, Ontario, 캐나다
      • Windsor, Ontario, 캐나다
    • Quebec
      • Drummondville, Quebec, 캐나다
  • 폴란드
      • Gdynia, 폴란드
    • Dolnośląskie
      • Wroclaw, Dolnośląskie, 폴란드
    • Lubelskie
      • Lublin, Lubelskie, 폴란드
    • Mazowieckie
      • Warszawa, Mazowieckie, 폴란드
    • Małopolskie
      • Krakow, Małopolskie, 폴란드
    • Opolskie
      • Strzelce Opolskie, Opolskie, 폴란드
    • Podkarpackie
      • Iwonicz Zdroj, Podkarpackie, 폴란드
    • Podlaskie
      • Bialystok, Podlaskie, 폴란드
    • Pomorskie
      • Gdansk, Pomorskie, 폴란드
    • Wielkopolskie
      • Poznan, Wielkopolskie, 폴란드
    • Zachodniopomorskie
      • Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, 폴란드
    • Łódzkie
      • Łódź, Łódzkie, 폴란드
    • Śląskie
      • Katowice, Śląskie, 폴란드
    • Świętokrzyskie
      • Skarzysko-Kamienna, Świętokrzyskie, 폴란드
  • 헝가리
      • Budapest, 헝가리
    • Békés
      • Oroshaza, Békés, 헝가리
    • Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok
      • Szolnok, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok, 헝가리
    • Veszprém
      • Veszprem, Veszprém, 헝가리
  • 호주
    • Australian Capital Territory
      • Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, 호주
    • New South Wales
      • Kogarah, New South Wales, 호주
    • Queensland
      • Benowa, Queensland, 호주
      • Dulwich, Queensland, 호주
    • South Australia
      • Hectorville, South Australia, 호주
    • Victoria
      • Carlton, Victoria, 호주

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic AD that had been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit;
  2. Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to a sufficient course of out-patient treatment with topical AD medication(s).

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in a prior Dupilumab clinical trial;
  2. Important side effects of topical medication (e.g. intolerance to treatment, hypersensitivity reactions, significant skin atrophy, systemic effects), as assessed by the investigator or treating physician;

  3. Having used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, was likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 2 weeks of study treatment:

    1. Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g, systemic steroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, Janus kinase inhibitors, interferon-gamma [IFN-γ], azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.);
    2. Phototherapy for AD;
  4. Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit;
  5. History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology at screening;
  6. Positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb), or hepatitis C antibody at the screening visit;
  7. Active or acute infection requiring systemic treatment within 2 weeks before baseline visit;
  8. Known or suspected history of immunosuppression;
  9. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the participant's participation in this study.

Note: The eligibility criteria listed above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial therefore not all inclusion/ exclusion criteria are listed.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 삼루타

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Placebo qw
Two subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by a single injection weekly (qw) from Week 1 to Week 51.
의약품: Placebo (for Dupilumab)
Subcutaneous injection in the different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) and upper thighs
다른: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)
All participants were required to treatment with a (TCS) using a standardized regimen. It was recommended that participants use triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% cream or fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% ointment for medium potency, and hydrocortisone 1% cream for low potency.
실험적: Dupilumab 300 mg q2w
Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by placebo (for Dupilumab) alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab every 2 weeks (q2w) from Week 1 to Week 51. During weeks in which Dupilumab was not administered, participants received placebo.
의약품: Placebo (for Dupilumab)
Subcutaneous injection in the different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) and upper thighs
다른: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)
All participants were required to treatment with a (TCS) using a standardized regimen. It was recommended that participants use triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% cream or fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% ointment for medium potency, and hydrocortisone 1% cream for low potency.
의약품: Dupilumab
Subcutaneous injection in the different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) and upper thighs
다른 이름들:
  • 듀피젠트
  • REGN668
  • SAR231893
실험적: Dupilumab 300 mg qw
Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab qw from Week 1 to Week 51.
다른: Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)
All participants were required to treatment with a (TCS) using a standardized regimen. It was recommended that participants use triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% cream or fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% ointment for medium potency, and hydrocortisone 1% cream for low potency.
의약품: Dupilumab
Subcutaneous injection in the different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) and upper thighs
다른 이름들:
  • 듀피젠트
  • REGN668
  • SAR231893

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points at Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 were reported.
Baseline to Week 16

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
습진 영역 및 심각도 지수(EASI) 점수의 기준선에서 16주까지의 변화율
기간: 16주까지의 기준선
EASI 점수는 알츠하이머병의 중증도와 범위를 측정하는 데 사용되었으며 신체의 4개 해부학적 영역(머리, 몸통, 상지 및 하지)에서 홍반, 침윤, 긁힘 및 태선화를 측정했습니다. 총 EASI 점수 범위는 0(최소)에서 72(최대) 포인트이며 점수가 높을수록 AD의 중증도가 더 나쁩니다.
16주까지의 기준선
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved ≥75% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 16.
Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 16 were reported.
Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥3 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥3 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 16 were reported.
Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points at Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 52 were reported.
Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved ≥75% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 52.
Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]).
Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 52 were reported.
Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥3 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥3 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 52 were reported.
Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 24
기간: Baseline to Week 24
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 24 were reported.
Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 4
기간: Baseline to Week 4
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 4 were reported.
Baseline to Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction ≥4 Points) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 2
기간: Baseline to Week 2
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Participants achieving a reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS score at Week 2 were reported.
Baseline to Week 2
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]).
Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined.
Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
SCORAD was a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) were assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).
Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
The DLQI was a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The 10 questions assessed QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring of 0 (absent disease) to 30 (severe disease); a high score was indicative of a poor QOL.
Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
The POEM was a 7-item questionnaire that assessed disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]).
Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven items relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire scored from 0 (minimum score) - 3 (maximum score) and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 21 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. Cut-offs for identifying psychiatric distress has been reported as 7 to 8 for possible presence, 10 to 11 for probable presence, and 14 to 15 for severe anxiety or depression.
Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/ papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease).
Baseline to Week 16
Proportion of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
Proportion of topical AD medication-free days through Week 52 was calculated as the number of days that a participant used neither topical corticosteroid (TCS)/ topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) nor system rescue therapy divided by the study days of each period.
Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score to Week 2
기간: Baseline to Week 2
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]).
Baseline to Week 2
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD.
Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined.
Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
SCORAD was a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) were assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).
Baseline to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/ papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease).
Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
The DLQI was a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The 10 questions assessed QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring of 0 (absent disease) to 30 (severe disease); a high score was indicative of a poor QOL.
Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
The POEM was a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]).
Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) to Week 52
기간: Baseline to Week 52
HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven items relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (minimum score) - 3 (maximum score) and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 21 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. Cut-offs for identifying psychiatric distress has been reported as 7 to 8 for possible presence, 10 to 11 for probable presence, and 14 to 15 for severe anxiety or depression.
Baseline to Week 52
Number of Flares Through Week 52
기간: Baseline up to Week 52
Atopic dermatitis (AD) flares were defined as worsening of the disease that required escalation/intensification of AD treatment. Number of flares occurred in the participants starting from first dose through Week 52 were reported.
Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation Through Week 52
기간: Baseline up to Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.
Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) From Baseline Through Week 52
기간: Baseline up to Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participants who received IMP was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to end of treatment at Week 52). Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Skin infection TEAEs were identified based on blinded adjudication of all reported TEAEs under the 2 primary System Organ Classes (SOC): SOC = "Infection and Infestations" or SOC = "Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders". Blinded adjudication was performed and finalized by the study medical monitor before database lock.
Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Skin Infection TEAEs (Excluding Herpetic Infections) From Baseline Through Week 52
기간: Baseline up to Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received IMP was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to end of treatment at Week 52). Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Skin infection TEAEs were identified based on blinded adjudication of all reported TEAEs under the 2 primary System Organ Classes (SOC): SOC = "Infection and Infestations" or SOC = "Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders". Blinded adjudication was performed and finalized by the study medical monitor before database lock.
Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) Requiring Systemic Treatment From Baseline Through Week 52
기간: Baseline up to Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received IMP was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to end of treatment at Week 52). Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Skin infection TEAEs were identified based on blinded adjudication of all reported TEAEs under the 2 primary System Organ Classes (SOC): SOC = "Infection and Infestations" or SOC = "Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders". Blinded adjudication was performed and finalized by the study medical monitor before database lock.
Baseline up to Week 52
Number of Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) Requiring Systemic Treatment From Baseline Through Week 52
기간: Baseline up to Week 52
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received IMP was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to end of treatment at Week 52). Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Skin infection TEAEs were identified based on blinded adjudication of all reported TEAEs under the 2 primary System Organ Classes (SOC): SOC = "Infection and Infestations" or SOC = "Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders". Blinded adjudication was performed and finalized by the study medical monitor before database lock.
Baseline up to Week 52

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change From Baseline in Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
The SNOT 22 was a validated measure of health related quality of life in sinonasal disease. It was a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0-5. The total score may range from 0 (no disease) -110 (worst disease) (lower scores represent better health related quality of life). The SNOT-22 was administered only to participants with chronic inflammatory conditions of the nasal mucosa and/or paranasal sinuses.
Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) Score to Week 16
기간: Baseline to Week 16
ACQ-5 questionnaire was a validated questionnaire comprising of 5 questions for asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath, and wheeze. Participants were asked to rate their asthma symptoms during the previous week on a 7-point scale as 0=no impairment, 6=maximum impairment. ACQ-5 score was the mean of the 5 questions and range between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled) (a higher score indicated lower asthma control). The ACQ-5 questionnaire was administered only to the participants with a medical history of asthma.
Baseline to Week 16

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

협력자

Sanofi

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2014년 9월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2015년 8월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2016년 10월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2014년 10월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2014년 10월 6일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2014년 10월 9일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2017년 10월 17일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2017년 10월 12일

마지막으로 확인됨

2017년 10월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • R668-AD-1224

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다