Efficacy of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Provoked Vestibulodynia : a Triple Blind Randomized Controlled Trial (PVD/tDCS)
2017년 5월 1일 업데이트: Mélanie Morin, Université de Sherbrooke
Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is the most common form of vulvodynia and despite its high prevalence and important sexual, conjugal and psychological deleterious repercussions, effective evidence-based interventions remain limited.
For a high proportion of women, significant pain persists despite the currently available treatments.
Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) was shown to be effective in various chronic pain conditions.
So far, only one case report study has shown significant pain reduction in women with vulvodynia.
The main goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of tDCS in women with PVD compared to sham tDCS.
Forty women diagnosed with PVD, by a gynecologist following a standardized protocol will be randomized to either active or sham tDCS for ten 20 minute sessions of 2 mA stimulation over a 2-week period.
Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, after treatment and at 3-month follow-up.
The primary outcome is pain during intercourse assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS).
Secondary measurements focus on sexual function, vestibular pain sensitivity, psychological distress, treatment satisfaction and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC).
The investigators expect that active tDCS treatment will significantly reduce pain during intercourse (post-treatment and 3-month follow-up compared to pre-treatment assessment).
This trial will provide important information for determining the efficacy of a novel and promising intervention for women with PVD.
연구 개요
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
40
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
Quebec
-
Sherbrooke, Quebec, 캐나다, J1H 5N4
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
-
Sherbrooke, Quebec, 캐나다, J1H 5N4
- Centre hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbroke
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
17년 (어린이, 성인)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
연구 대상 성별
여성
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Experience moderate to severe pain in at least 90% of attempted sexual intercourse;
- Experience moderate to severe pain during cotton swab test, in one or more regions of the vestibule (minimum of 5/10 on a subjective numeric scale of pain intensity);
- Pain limited to the vestibule during vaginal intercourse and during activities exerting pressure on the vestibule (tampon insertion, tight jeans or pants, cycling, horseback riding);
- Presence of PVD for at least 6 months and diagnosed according to the standardized gynecological examination protocol by one of our staff gynecologists;
- Have a stable sexual partner with regular sexual activity including penetration.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other pelvic pathology associated with pelvic pain (e.g., deep dyspareunia);
- Chronic pain conditions (e.g. fibromyalgia, low back pain, chronic migraines);
- Use of medication that can influence the perception of pain (eg analgesic, opioids, antiepileptic, muscle relaxant);
- Pregnancy for less than one year and breastfeeding;
- Anterior vulvar or vaginal surgery;
- Refusal to refrain from other treatments one month prior to first treatment study until the last 3-month follow-up assessment;
- Important urogynecologic symptoms (urinary or anal incontinence, urinary urgency, pelvic organ prolapse, active urinary tract or vaginal infection or earlier in the last 3 months, etc.);
- Contraindications to tDCS (e.g. metallic implant in or near the skull, history of epilepsy, pacemaker);
- Previously received tDCS treatment.
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 네 배로
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Intervention
Participants will receive active transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) for ten 20 minute sessions of 2 mA stimulation over a 2-week period.
|
tDCS is a painless technique which consists in applying low direct-current through electrodes (one electrode serving as an anode, the other as a cathode) placed on the scalp to target the cerebral cortex.
In patients with chronic pain, the anode is commonly placed over the motor cortex (M1) (Valeriani et al., 1999).
다른 이름들:
|
|
가짜 비교기: Placebo
Participants will receive sham transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) for ten 20 minute sessions of 2 mA stimulation over a 2-week period.
|
tDCS is a painless technique which consists in applying low direct-current through electrodes (one electrode serving as an anode, the other as a cathode) placed on the scalp to target the cerebral cortex.
In patients with chronic pain, the anode is commonly placed over the motor cortex (M1) (Valeriani et al., 1999).
다른 이름들:
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain during intercourse (Numeric rating scale)
기간: Change in the NRS scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
Pain during intercourse will be assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain at all, and 10 is the worst pain ever.
This method for measuring pain has been shown to detect significant treatment effects in women with PVD and demonstrates a significant positive correlation with other pain intensity measures.
Pain during intercourse is the main symptom of PVD and the one that most interferes with quality of life, hence the most relevant measure of functional outcome (Bergeron et al., 2008; Bergeron et al., 2001; Morin et al., 2010; Morin et al., 2011).
|
Change in the NRS scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain (McGill-Melzack questionnaire)
기간: Change in the McGill-Melzack scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
The McGill-Melzack questionnaire allows the assessment of sensory, affective and evaluative components of pain.
This world-renowned questionnaire, studied for its validity, reliability and responsiveness to change, is commonly used in RCTs (Bergeron et al., 2001; Melzack, 1975; Davidoff et al., 1987; Hays et al., 1994; Bansal et al., 2009; Moy et al., 2011; Foster et al., 2010).
|
Change in the McGill-Melzack scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
|
Vestibular sensitivity (algometer)
기간: Change in the pain threshold and pain tolerance scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
A gradual pressure (1 to 1000 g) will be applied to three distinct points of the vestibule at the 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions (Cyr et al., 2014).
Each of these pressure points will be applied randomly (e.g.
3,6,9 or 3,9,6 or 6,9,3.).
During this procedure, each participant will be asked to indicate when they start to feel pain (pain threshold) and subsequently the maximal pressure that can be tolerated (pain tolerance).
Pain intensity is assessed throughout the test using a Computerized Visual analog scale (CoVas).
This assessment has shown good reliability and validity (Cyr et al., 2014).
|
Change in the pain threshold and pain tolerance scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
|
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
기간: Change in the FSFI scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a multidimensional measure of sexual function evaluating desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain.
In addition to good psychometric properties (reliability, internal consistency and responsiveness to change (Rosen et al., 2000; Goldfinger et al, 2009), normative data are available for this questionnaire suggesting clinical level of dysfunctions (Wiegel et al., 2005).
|
Change in the FSFI scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
기간: Change in the PCS scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
Pain catastrophizing will be assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Sullivan, Bishop, & Pivik, 1995), which consists of 13 items measuring exaggerated negative thoughts and feelings about the meaning of pain.
Items are scored on a 5-point scale with the end points (0) not at all and (4) all the time.
The PCS is a reliable and valid measure that has demonstrated a stable factorial structure across clinical and general populations, including a French population (French et al., 2005; Osman et al., 2000; Sullivan, et al., 1995).
|
Change in the PCS scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
|
Spielberg State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (IASTA)
기간: Change in the IASTA state and IASTA trait scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
Anxiety will be assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI - (Spielberger, Gorsuch, & Lushene, 1970); ASTA - (Gauthier & Bouchard, 1993)).
The STAI is a 40-item, well-known and widely used measure of state and trait anxiety that has demonstrated very good psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha State = .93,
Trait = .97)
in various clinical and non-clinical samples including pain populations (Gauthier & Bouchard, 1993; Greenberg & Burns, 2003; Rule & Traver, 1983; Tanaka-Masumi & Kameoka, 1986).
|
Change in the IASTA state and IASTA trait scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory questionnaire (BDI-II)
기간: Change in the BDI scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
Depression or depression symptoms will be measured with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II).
The BDI-II is comprised of 21 items, with scores for most items ranging from 0 (low intensity) to 3 (high intensity) (Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996; Beck, Steer & Garvin, 1988).
This measure of depression has been validated for use in chronic pain populations (Turner & Romano, 1984).
|
Change in the BDI scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
|
Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20)
기간: Change in the PASS-20 scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20), evaluating fear of pain, also shows good psychometric properties (Coons, Hadjistavropoulos & Asmundson, 2004; McCracken & Dhingra, 2002).
|
Change in the PASS-20 scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
|
Patient's global impression of change (PGIC)
기간: Change in the PGIC scores from 2-week post-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
Patient self-reported improvement [scale of 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied)] and treatment satisfaction [scale of 0 (worse) to 10 (complete cure)] will be measured at the 2-week post-treatment and 3-month post-treatment structured interview in order to assess the clinical significance of results.
|
Change in the PGIC scores from 2-week post-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
|
Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction scale (GMSS)
기간: Change in the GMSS scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
Sexual satisfaction will be assessed using the Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction scale, which consists of 5 items assessing global sexual satisfaction.
Internal consistency of this scale is high (alpha = 0.90), as is test-retest reliability (r = 0.84) (Lawrance & Byers, 1998).
|
Change in the GMSS scores from pre- to 2-week post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to 3-month post-treatment
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.
유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
2014년 11월 1일
기본 완료 (실제)
2016년 6월 1일
연구 완료 (실제)
2016년 11월 1일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2015년 9월 4일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2015년 9월 4일
처음 게시됨 (추정)
2015년 9월 7일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2017년 5월 2일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2017년 5월 1일
마지막으로 확인됨
2017년 5월 1일
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .