이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Video Discharge Instructions for Pediatric Gastroenteritis in an Emergency Department

2020년 7월 7일 업데이트: Gonzalo Solis Garcia, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Video Discharge Instructions for Pediatric Gastroenteritis in an Emergency Department: a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Video discharge instructions (VDI) have been suggested as a useful strategy to improve discharge instructions in pediatric emergency units. The goal of this study is to evaluate if the addition of VDI to usual verbal information improved the comprehension of information provided to caregivers of patients who consult for acute gastroenteritis (AGE). An open-label, parallel, randomized trial was designed, enrolling patients who consult for AGE. First, caregivers answer a written test concerning AGE characteristics and management. They are randomly allocated to a control group, which receives verbal discharge instructions, or to an intervention group, which additionally receives video discharge instructions. After discharge, caregivers are contacted by telephone and answer the same test. Main outcome measure is difference between test scores in the first and the second tests, secondary endpoints are how many caregivers score 5/5 on the second test, as well as rate of return visits and caregivers satisfaction with the information received.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

상세 설명

Video discharge instructions (VDI) have been suggested as a useful strategy to improve discharge instructions in pediatric emergency units. This study is designed to evaluate if the addition of VDI to usual verbal information improves the comprehension of the information provided to caregivers of patients who consult in pediatric emergency department for acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Secondary objectives are evaluating if video instructions improve satisfaction with the information received and decrease return visits.

The study is an open-label, parallel, randomized trial which takes place between June 2019 and June 2020 in the pediatric emergency department of a third-level Spanish hospital which receives 58000 emergencies annually. Up to 3 eligible patients are enrolled every shift when one of the main investigators is present. Simple, 1:1 randomization is performed using R software. Patients are randomly assigned to a group by opening sequentially numbered paper envelopes which contain the group in which the patient will be allocated, ensuring thus allocation concealment. Written informed consent is provided before trial enrollment.

Interventions

The trial is developed in three steps: an initial written test, an information phase and a second follow-up test after discharge. After enrollment, all patients fill-in a written test before discharge, which consists of 5 questions about AGE, 1 point per correct answer. Enrolled subjects are randomly assigned to the control or intervention group. In the first group of subjects (control group) caregivers receive, after completing the test and prior to discharge, the usual verbal information and recommendations about AGE following the guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Emergencies. In the second group (intervention group) patients are shown a short 2-minute video providing the same information about AGE, in addition to verbal instructions. In both groups, instructions are given by one of the main investigators in order to provide homogeneous and consistent information. Both sets of instructions explicitly include the information that had been previously asked in the test. All patients additionally receive a discharge report which includes instructions concerning aftercare treatment.

After discharge, all caregivers are contacted by telephone and asked the same 5 questions from the initial test. The questionnaire has to be completed by the same caregiver as in the previous test. This test also includes questions about subsequent visits to either emergency units or outpatient pediatric clinics and satisfaction with the information. The first telephonic contact is established 72 hours after discharge, and if unable to contact, repeated every 1-2 days up to a total of 5 days before excluding them and considering them as lost in follow-up.

Statistical Analysis The sample size was calculated to provide a statistical power of 80% at an alpha level of 5% to detect a two-tailed difference of 0.5 points between the two groups. It was calculated that with an estimated loss rate of 15% of patients between randomization and follow-up test, assuming a 1-point variance in test results based on previous studies, this statistical power would be reached by enrolling 75 patients in each group.

All randomized patients who complete both tests are included in the primary-end point analysis as part of the group in which they were randomized, following intention-to-treat principle. The differences in test points and satisfaction between groups are analyzed using Student's T-test, and the differences in proportions are analyzed using Chi-square test. Statistical significance is set at p<0.05. Analysis are performed using Rv3.6.1 and SPSS.25 statistical softwares.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

139

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Madrid, 스페인, 28009
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

1개월 (어린이)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who met ESPGHAN criteria for AGE: decreased stool consistency and/or increased evacuation frequency during a period <7 days, associated or not to fever or vomiting.
  • Patients accompanied by a usual caregiver.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe dehydration
  • Patients with chronic comorbidities needing special instructions (i.e. neurologic, respiratory or cardiologic)
  • Patients whose caregivers were not able to communicate in Spanish
  • Patients who were admitted for hospitalization.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 지지 요법
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
간섭 없음: Control group: usual verbal instructions
In this group, caregivers receive, after completing the test and prior to discharge, the usual verbal information and recommendations about AGE following the guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Emergencies. The instructions are always given by one of the main investigators to provide homogeneity in the information
실험적: Intervention group: video discharge instructions
Additionally to the verbal information, patients are shown a short 2-minute video providing the same information about AGE that would be given by verbal information.
Short video (2 minutes) including information about clinical features, management and follow up of pediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in test score
기간: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
We calculated the difference between the score obtained in the initial test and the score obteined in the follow-up test and compared between groups. Scores are based on a 5-question test, minimum score is 0 points and maximum score (best score) is 5 points
From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Number of caregivers getting a total score of 5 points
기간: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
We measured how many caregivers got a 5-score (perfect) in the follow up test after interventions, and compared between groups
From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
Rate of return visits
기간: 72 hours from from the first emergency care visit
We asked caregivers whether they had returned to emergency care or to pediatric outpatient clinics for the same problem after the first visit.
72 hours from from the first emergency care visit
Satisfaction score with the information received
기간: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
We asked caregivers to give a score between 1 and 10 (1 very unsatisfied, 10 very satisfied) regarding how useful they felt that the information given to them had been.
From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Gonzalo Solís, M.D., Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2019년 6월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2020년 3월 31일

연구 완료 (실제)

2020년 6월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2020년 6월 23일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2020년 7월 7일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 7월 9일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 7월 9일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2020년 7월 7일

마지막으로 확인됨

2020년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

IPD 계획 설명

All collected IPD are available under request.

IPD 공유 기간

Data will be available as soon as published. It will be available for 20 years (year 2040)

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

Investigators with research accepted by a research ethics committee conducting research in this area.

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • 연구_프로토콜
  • 수액
  • ICF
  • CSR

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다