- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT04873791
Comparison of the Effects of Different Living Environments in Geriatric Individuals: A Pilot Study
Comparison of Cognitive Function, Balance, Quality of Life, Depression and Daily Living Activities of Geriatric Individuals Living in Home Environment and Nursing Home.
In Turkey, 63% of geriatric people who make up approximately 8.3% of the entire population live in their own living environment, 36% live with their children and 1% live in nursing homes. The number of individuals living in nursing homes is increasing as the nuclear family structure becomes more evident. National Social Security programs give special importance to nursing home restructuring and Social Health Policy aims to increase practices related to "aging in place" and "Active and Healthy Ageing" for geriatric individuals. In this context, projects aimed at preventing secondary negative symptoms in aging and supporting the quality aging process are outstanding.
The aim of this study is to assess and compare cognitive functions, balance, musculoskeletal pain severity, psychological state, participation level in activities of daily living, and quality of life of geriatric individuals living different environments.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
Aging is a process that negatively affects the individual physiologically, psychologically, and socially. Degenerative changes in the musculoskeletal system cause joint pain, limitations, restrictions on activity participation, and physical and social dependence. Neurodegenerative processes, on the other hand, lead to loss of cognitive functions, balance, and coordination. The decrease in biological and social motives and the gradual increase in social and physiological losses, lead to dependence in the activities of daily living, worsening psychological condition, and deteriorating quality of life. With this process, the caregiver burden increases economically and socially.
Today, there is a growing proportion of geriatric individuals in society. According to 2015 data from the World Health Organization, 900 million geriatric individuals live on earth. According to a population projection made by the WHO in 2018, the elderly population is estimated to reach around 2 billion people out of 900 million people by 2050. These data show that 22% of society will be made up of older individuals by 2050.
There were no studies that investigated the effects of different living environments thoroughly on geriatric individuals.The purpose of this research is to evaluate and compare cognitive functions, balance, musculoskeletal pain level, psychological state, participation level in activities of daily living, and quality of life of elderly people living at home and elderly people living in nursing homes in Turkey.
The Aim of This Study Is: To assess and compare of cognitive function, balance, quality of life, depression and daily living activities of geriatric individuals, living in home environment and nursing home
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
-
Istanbul, 칠면조, 34854
- Marmara University
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
샘플링 방법
연구 인구
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Volunteering to research,
- Being in the age range of 65-95,
- Individuals with no known health problems, caused inactivity.
- Adequate cognitive functions (Standardized Mini Mental Test score of 24 and above).
- Individuals who do not have musculoskeletal problems that prevent physical activity.
- Giving the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mental retardation
- Epileptic history
- Those with diseases that cause neurological, orthopedic, and musculoskeletal problems.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 관찰 모델: 케이스 컨트롤
- 시간 관점: 단면
코호트 및 개입
그룹/코호트 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
Group 1
Assessment Geriatric Individuals Living at Home were joined in Group 1. Demographic and social characteristics, cognitive functions, balance, pain, depression, quality of life, and activities of daily living of elderly individuals living in a nursing home and home environment were evaluated. Demographic information of all subjects (age, gender, educational status, occupation, body weight, height, body mass index), Standardized Mini-Mental Test (SMMT) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score, Barthel Index score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) score were used for evaluations. Assessments were made as described in section of outcome measures, in one session. |
Assessments explained in the arm section were made as described in one session in both group
|
|
Group 2
Assessment Geriatric Individuals Living in Nursing Home were joined in Group 2. Demographic and social characteristics, cognitive functions, balance, pain, depression, quality of life, and activities of daily living of elderly individuals living in a nursing home and home environment were evaluated. Demographic information of all subjects (age, gender, educational status, occupation, body weight, height, body mass index), Standardized Mini-Mental Test (SMMT) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score, Barthel Index score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) score were used for evaluations. Assessments were made as described in section of outcome measures, in one session. |
Assessments explained in the arm section were made as described in one session in both group
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Cognitive performance evaluation
기간: 10 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information (It was done between the 10th and 25th minutes of the assessment)
|
Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) was used.
It is used for the quantitative evaluation of cognitive performance within the standard neuropsychiatric examination methods.
The test is a short, useful, and a standardized method that can be used globally to determine the cognitive level.
It is evaluated in 11 items and under 5 main titles and over a total of 30 points.
Low score refers to severe cognitive impairment.
|
10 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information (It was done between the 10th and 25th minutes of the assessment)
|
|
Pain severity assessment
기간: 25 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information (It was done between the 25th and 30th minutes of the assessment)
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that is an easy, reproducible, minimal tool-requiring, and understandable measurement tool for the assessment of pain intensity was used.
This scale consists of a horizontal, straight line.
There is a value of 0 at the beginning of the line and 10 at the end.
|
25 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information (It was done between the 25th and 30th minutes of the assessment)
|
|
Balance assessment
기간: 30 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information. After the visual analogue scale evaluation, the geriatric individuals were rested for 5 minutes (It was done between the 35th and 50th minutes of the assessment).
|
Berg Balance Scale (BDI) was used to measure balance performance in geriatric individuals.
It is often used in clinical trials to assess postural control and predict the risk of falls.
The test is made difficult by reducing the ground support.
This test consists of 14 items and each section is rated between 0 (bad) and 4 (best).
The high score indicates the best balance.
0-20 indicates high risk, 21-40 indicates moderate risk and 41-64 indicates low risk.
|
30 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information. After the visual analogue scale evaluation, the geriatric individuals were rested for 5 minutes (It was done between the 35th and 50th minutes of the assessment).
|
|
Evaluation of Depression score
기간: 50 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information (It was done between the 50th and 60th minutes of the assessment).
|
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) was used.
It consists of 30 self-report questions.
In the scoring of the scale, 1 point is given to each answer that suggests depression, and 0 is given for the other answers, and the final score is considered as the depression score.
A cut off value of 0-10 was defined as the absence of depression, 11-13 as "probable depression," and 14 and above as "definite depression."
|
50 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information (It was done between the 50th and 60th minutes of the assessment).
|
|
Activities of daily living
기간: 60 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information. After the geriatric depression scale evaluation, the geriatric individuals were rested for 5 minutes. (It was done between the 65th and 70th minutes of the assessment).
|
Barthel Index (BI) was used.
The Barthel index consists of 10 main items.
The items measure feeding, transferring from bed to wheelchair and to and from a toilet, grooming, bathing, walking on a level surface (or propelling a wheelchair if unable to walk), going up and down the stairs, dressing and undressing, controlling bladder and controlling bowel.
The total score is between 0 and 100 and scores of 0-20 indicate "total" dependency, 21-60 indicate "severe" dependency, 61-90 indicate "moderate" dependency, 91-99 indicates "slight" dependency and 100 indicate "total" independency.
|
60 minutes after obtaining socio-demographic information. After the geriatric depression scale evaluation, the geriatric individuals were rested for 5 minutes. (It was done between the 65th and 70th minutes of the assessment).
|
|
Assessment of Quality of life
기간: It was completed after 70 minutes obtaining socio-demographic information.
|
Short Form 36 (SF-36) was used.
It is a scale that has a generic scale feature and provides extensive measurement.
It consists of 36 questions under 8 subheadings.
Low scores indicate deterioration in the quality of life.
|
It was completed after 70 minutes obtaining socio-demographic information.
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Body mass index
기간: After the permission of patients, it was calculated, in the first 10 minutes of assessment.
|
Body mass index (BMI) is an inexpensive and easy screening method for weight category.
It was calculated with person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters.
|
After the permission of patients, it was calculated, in the first 10 minutes of assessment.
|
|
Using of walking aids
기간: After the permission of patients, it was calculated, in the first 10 minutes of assessment.
|
Whether the participant used a walking aid or not was recorded.
|
After the permission of patients, it was calculated, in the first 10 minutes of assessment.
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 연구 책임자: Aysel Yildiz Ozer, PT, PhD, Marmara University
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .