이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Upper Punctal Plug Occlusion in Previous Lower Punctal Occlusion.

2026년 5월 4일 업데이트: Karim Mohamed-Noriega, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Effectiveness of Upper Punctal Plug Occlusion in Patients With Dry Eye Disease With Previous Lower Punctal Occlusion.

This study evaluates the therapeutic effect of upper punctal plug occlusion in patients with dry eye disease with previous lower punctal occlusion.

연구 개요

상태

모병

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

This prospective, consecutive, interventional, longitudinal, case series study includes patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye disease who have inferior punctal occlusion. The study aims to evaluate the effect of superior lacrimal punctal occlusion with a plug dry eye symptoms and signs. Assessments will be performed at baseline and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months following superior punctal occlusion

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

36

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

  • 멕시코
    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey, Nuevo León, 멕시코, 64460
        • 모병
        • Ophthalmology Department
        • 연락하다:

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of both sexes
  • One or both eyes may be included
  • Inferior lacrimal punctum occluded (with a punctal plug or cauterization), clinically sealed under slit-lamp examination
  • Functional superior lacrimal punctum
  • Aqueous-deficient dry eye (such as Sjögren's disease, graft-versus-host disease, or primary dry eye disease.)
  • Age >18 years
  • OSDI score >13 and one of the following signs: Tear film markers (Fluorescein tear break up-time <5, First non-invasive tear breakup time <10, Schirmer test without anesthesia <10 mm, Schirmer test with anesthesia <10 mm), Ocular surface markers (corneal staining >5 spots or conjunctival staining >9 spots).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active ocular surface infection.
  • Patients who are unwilling to participate or to provide written informed consent.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 다른
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: 1 arm, superior lacrimal punctal occlusion with plug in patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye who
1 arm, superior lacrimal punctal occlusion with plug in patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye who have previously occlusion of the inferior lacrimal punctum.
절차: Punctal plug occlusion
Superior lacrimal punctal occlusion with plug in patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye who have previously occlusion of the inferior lacrimal punctum.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
1. Effectiveness
기간: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
To evaluate signs and symptoms of dry eye, after superior lacrimal punctal occlusion with plug in patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye who have previously occlusion of the inferior lacrimal punctum at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in lower tear meniscus heigh
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in lower tear meniscus height measured using Keratograph and optical coherence tomography (OCT) after upper punctal plug placement.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in lower tear meniscus area
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in lower tear meniscus area measured using Keratograph and optical coherence tomography (OCT) after upper punctal plug placement.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change from baseline in dry eye severity as assessed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.

The OSDI is a validated 12-item questionnaire evaluating dry eye symptoms and their impact on vision-related functioning across three domains: ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental triggers. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = none of the time to 4 = all of the time). The total OSDI score is calculated as:

OSDI= number of questions answered (sum of scores)×25

Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Severity categories are: normal (0-12), mild (13-22), moderate (23-32), and severe (33-100).
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change from baseline in dry eye symptoms as assessed by the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) scale.
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.

The SANDE is a validated, patient-reported outcome measuring dry eye symptom burden using two 100-mm visual analog scales assessing frequency and severity of symptoms (0 = none, 100 = maximal). The composite SANDE score is calculated as the square root of the product of frequency and severity scores:

Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in tear film break-up time (TFBUT).
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in tear film break-up time measured with fluorescein after upper punctal plug placement.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT).
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in non-invasive tear break-up time measured using Keratograph after upper punctal plug placement.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change from baseline in ocular surface damage as assessed by the SICCA Ocular Surface Staining Score (OSS).
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
The SICCA OSS is a standardized clinical grading system developed by the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance to quantify ocular surface epithelial damage using vital dyes. The score combines fluorescein corneal staining and lissamine green conjunctival staining in each eye.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change from baseline in corneal epithelial damage as assessed by the National Eye Institute Corneal Fluorescein Staining (NEI) score
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.

The NEI corneal fluorescein staining score is a standardized slit-lamp-based grading system used to quantify corneal epithelial damage after fluorescein instillation. The cornea is divided into five regions (central, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal). Each region is graded on a 0 to 3 scale based on staining density and extent:

0 = no staining

  1. = sparse punctate staining
  2. = moderate/dense punctate staining
  3. = severe staining or coalescent areas

The total NEI score is the sum of all regions, ranging from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater corneal epithelial damage.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in Schirmer I test results.
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in tear production measured using the Schirmer I test with and without anesthesia after upper punctal plug placement.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in corneal sensitivity.
기간: Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Change in corneal sensitivity measured by corneal esthesiometry after upper punctal plug placement.
Baseline to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Incidence of epiphora after upper punctal plug placement.
기간: Up to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Incidence of epiphora reported after upper punctal plug placement during the follow-up period.
Up to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Upper punctal plug retention rate.
기간: Up to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.
Proportion of upper punctal plugs remaining in place during the follow-up period after placement.
Up to 3 months after upper punctal plug placement.

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Karim Mohamed-Noriega, Dr. med., Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

  • 14. Qiu, W., Liu, Z., Ao, M., Li, X., & Wang, W. (2013). Punctal plugs versus artificial tears for treating primary Sjögren's syndrome with keratoconjunctivitis SICCA: A comparative observation of their effects on visual function. Rheumatology International, 33(10), 2543-2548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-013-2769-1
  • 13. Perez, V. L., Chen, W., Craig, J. P., Dogru, M., Jones, L., Stapleton, F., Wolffsohn, J. S., & Sullivan, D. A. (2025). TFOS DEWS III: Executive Summary. American Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.035
  • 12. Marcet, M. M., Shtein, R. M., Bradley, E. A., Deng, S. X., Meyer, D. R., Bilyk, J. R., Yen, M. T., Lee, W. B., Mawn, L. A., & Lum, F. (2015a). Safety and Efficacy of Lacrimal Drainage System Plugs for Dry Eye Syndrome A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology, 122(8), 1681-1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.034
  • 11. Lanza NL, Valenzuela F, Perez VL, Galor A. The Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Point-of-Care Test in Dry Eye. Ocul Surf [Internet]. 2016 Apr 1;14(2):189-95. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542012416000082
  • 10. Kaido, M., Ishida, R., Dogru, M., & Tsubota, K. (2013). Comparison of retention rates and complications of 2 different types of silicon lacrimal punctal plugs in the treatment of dry eye disease. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 155(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.10.024
  • 9. Hallali, G., Guindolet, D., Gabison, E. E., Cochereau, I., & Doan, S. (2024a). Immediate and Delayed Effects of Punctal Plug Insertion on Tear Meniscus Height in Severe Aqueous-Deficient Dry Eye. www.corneajrnl.com
  • 8. Craig, J. P., Nichols, K. K., Akpek, E. K., Caffery, B., Dua, H. S., Joo, C. K., Liu, Z., Nelson, J. D., Nichols, J. J., Tsubota, K., & Stapleton, F. (2017a). TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. In Ocular Surface (Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 276-283). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008
  • 7. Chen, F., Wang, J., Chen, W., Shen, M., Xu, S., & Lu, F. (2010). Upper punctal occlusion versus lower punctal occlusion in dry eye. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 51(11), 5571-5577. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-5097
  • 6. Chen, F., Shen, M., Chen, W., Wang, J., Li, M., Yuan, Y., & Lu, F. (2010). Tear meniscus volume in dry eye after punctal occlusion. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 51(4), 1965-1969. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4349
  • 5. Burgess, P. I., Koay, P., & Clark, P. (n.d.). SmartPlug Versus Silicone Punctal Plug Therapy for Dry Eye A Prospective Randomized Trial.
  • 4. Boldin, I., Klein, A., Haller-Schober, E. M., & Horwath-Winter, J. (2008). Long-term Follow-up of Punctal and Proximal Canalicular Stenoses After Silicone Punctal Plug Treatment in Dry Eye Patients. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 146(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.028
  • 3. Balaram, M., Schaumberg, D. A., & Dana, M. R. (2001). Efficacy and Tolerability Outcomes After Punctal Occlusion With Silicone Plugs in Dry Eye Syndrome.
  • 2. Ali, M. J., & Singh, S. (2021). Optical coherence tomography and the proximal lacrimal drainage system: a major review. In Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (Vol. 259, Issue 11, pp. 3197-3208). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05175-3
  • 1. Ahn, H., Ji, Y. W., Jun, I., Kim, T. I., Lee, H. K., & Seo, K. Y. (2022). Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Dry Eye in Primary Sjogren's Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020463

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2026년 2월 12일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2026년 10월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2026년 11월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 2월 12일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 5월 4일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 6일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 5월 4일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 2월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • OF25-00001

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다