이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Digital Tool for Improved Self-management of COPD (FOCUS)

2026년 5월 4일 업데이트: Björn Nordlund

Primary aim: To evaluate the feasibility, usability and safety of the investigational device in clinical practice over 6 months in 50 patients.

Secondary aims: To describe the number of healthcare contacts and the adequacy of those contacts.

Study design: Traditional feasibility clinical investigationPilot feasibility open observational study.

Subjects: 50 subjects being investigated for or with a diagnosis of COPD with at least one exacerbation within the last year will be invited to voluntarily participate. Exclusion criteria is severe disease from either COPD or any severe concomitant conditions that would make home spirometry unsafe for the patient. Patients with no access to use BankID or similar electronic personal identification service and not using Android (version 8+) or iOS (version 16+) smartphones will be excluded.

Intervention: At inclusion patients will be on-boarded on to the digital platform and recommended to follow instructions in the app. The intervention is the COPD Treatment check, which is a medical device that is connected to a spirometer. Patients will be instructed to self-test on a daily basis.

Control group: There will be no control group.

Primary endpoints:

• Feasability and usability of the system in a clinical setting as determined by usage and questionnaire evaluation. Feasibility measured by proportion of participants who complete the study, compliance and adoption (system usage), time needed to train users

Secondary endpoints:

  • Safety of the device

    - Experienced usability and the number of adverse events

  • Adequacy of the participant's healthcare contacts.

    • Number of actual clinic contacts in relation to the number of recommendations by the COPD treatment check to seek medical attention. Exacerbations (as defined by healthcare staff)
    • Evaluation of questionnaires (healthcare and patient reported)

연구 개요

상태

모병

정황

상세 설명

Patient "education" often takes the form of providers giving didactic Information and assumes that knowledge will lead to behavioural change. Although important, it may not be sufficient for promoting self-management skills. Enhancing patient knowledge is an important step towards behaviour change using self-management interventions and should include topics such as smoking cessation, correct use of inhaler devices, early recognition of exacerbations, decision-making and acting at the right time, and when to seek help. Personalized education and training that takes into account specific issues relating to the individual patient, and that aims to enhance long-term functionality and appropriate health behaviours are likely to benefit patients more. A good COPD self-management intervention is structured but personalized, with goals of motivating, engaging and supporting the patients to positively adapt their health behaviour(s) and develop skills to better manage their disease. The aim is to elicit patient motivation, confidence and competence. Systematic reviews have provided evidence that self-management interventions improve outcomes in COPD. A 2022 Cochrane review reported that interventions for people with COPD are associated with improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a lower probability of respiratory-related hospital admissions, and no excess respiratory-related and all-cause mortality risks.

One of the most important goals for treatment of COPD exacerbations are to minimize the negative impact of an exacerbation and to prevent subsequent events. Also, it is now recognized that many exacerbations are not reported to healthcare professionals for therapy and yet these events have a significant impact on health status. Thus, one focus is for COPD patients to receive education about the importance of understanding exacerbation symptoms and when to seek professional healthcare.

According to the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare a written self-management plan should be established together with the healthcare team and be reevaluated at follow-up visits. The plan should contain information on how to adjust treatment according to for example symptoms and infections, and when it is important for the patient to contact healthcare for assistance.

The investigational device is a separate module, COPD Treatment check, embedded in the cloud-based CE-marked system called AsthmaTuner. Our hypothesis is that this digital tool will improve self-management of COPD. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the feasibility, usability and safety of the COPD Treatment check in clinical practice. Secondary aim is to evaluate the number of healthcare contacts and the adequacy of those contacts.

At baseline, a trained nurse will onboard and instruct patients in device handling (standard education). According to a flow algorithm, the app will instruct patients to contact their healthcare provider. The healthcare provider will be able to see collected data that is displayed in the back-end system but will not be instructed to actively monitor patients.

Data on feasibility, safety and experienced usability of the investigational device will be presented. The analysis of feasibility and the experienced benefit of using the COPD Treatment check in clinical practice is estimated on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and presented as mean and median scores. The number of clinic contacts will be presented in relation to the number of times that the app has recommended such contacts. A medical doctor will categorize the contacts as correct or incorrect, without knowing whether the contacts were initiated via the app or the patient themselves to avoid bias.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

50

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

    • Stockholm County
      • Solna, Stockholm County, 스웨덴, 17164
        • 모병
        • KPE Lung and Allergy, QB:84, Karolinska University Hospital.
        • 연락하다:
          • Björn Nordlund Sponsor and Investigator, PhD, Associate Professor
          • 전화번호: 0046703234414
          • 이메일: bjorn.nordlund@ki.se

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects from the age of 40 years with documented diagnosis of COPD, using at least two inhaled medications (one combination inhaler or several inhalers), and with at least one exacerbation within the last year will be invited to voluntarily participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria is severe disease from either COPD or any severe concomitant conditions that would make home spirometry unsafe for the patient. Patients with no access to use BankID or similar electronic personal identification service and not using smartphones will be excluded. Also, individuals who are pregnant or breastfeeding women, and individuals who are unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment or other reasons indicating lack of decision-making capacity will be excluded.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 지지 요법
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: COPD treatment check
At inclusion patients will be onboarded to the digital platform and recommended to follow instructions in the app. The intervention is the COPD Treatment check, which is a medical device that is connected to a spirometer. Patients will be instructed to self-test on a daily basis.
The investigational device is designed to support self-management of COPD. It provided patients with remote individualized feedback and recommendations for symptom relief and exacerbation management based on actual lung function and symptom report.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
The rate of participants that perceives the device feasible to use.
기간: 6 months
Feasability of the system in a clinical setting as determined by usage and questionnaire evaluation.
6 months

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Adequacy of the participant's healthcare contacts and adverse events.
기간: 6 months
Number of actual clinic contacts in relation to the number of recommendations by the COPD treatment check to seek medical attention. Adverse events listed in agreement with the Clinical Investigation Plan version 5.
6 months

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2025년 12월 5일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 5월 5일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 5월 5일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2025년 12월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 5월 4일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 7일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 7일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 5월 4일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다