이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Multilayer Inelastic Bandage Training in Physiotherapy Students

2026년 5월 11일 업데이트: Elif Duygu-Yildiz, Abant Izzet Baysal University

Evaluation of Skills, Interface Pressure Consistency and Confidence in Multilayer Compression Bandage Training for Physiotherapy Students: Quasi-experimental Study

The goal of this quasiexperimental study is to evaluate the effects of structured training on inelastic compression bandaging proficiency in fourth-year physiotherapy students. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Can supervised training significantly improve primary outcomes such as technical bandaging skills (measured by a standardized rubric)? Does structured education enhance secondary outcomes, including interface pressure accuracy, application time, and student self-confidence? Researchers will compare a Supervised Education Group receiving real-time biofeedback to a Control Group receiving an instructional brochure to see if expert-led training is more effective than passive learning in bridging the gap between perceived and actual clinical competence.

Participants will:

Perform a baseline bandaging application (T0) assessed via a two-station Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE).

Be assigned to either the supervised training session (with Kikuhime pressure sensors for feedback) or the brochure-based self-study group.

Complete a post-intervention assessment (T1) to measure improvements in technical skill, pressure precision, and self-confidence levels.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of structured training on inelastic compression bandaging skills, interface pressure accuracy, and self-confidence among physiotherapy students.

Methods: This study was conducted with 41 physiotherapy students (Education Group: n=21; Control Group: n=20). The Education Group received supervised training with objective pressure feedback while the Control Group received an instructional brochure. Clinical bandaging skills were evaluated using a two-station Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE), consisting of standardized rubric and time, and interface pressure monitoring. Students were assessed at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1) for bandaging skills (via rubric), interface pressure (Kikuhime), application time (seconds), and self-confidence (VAS).

Results: At baseline, only 9.5% of the Education Group and 0% of the Control Group achieved the target pressure. Post-intervention, these rates increased to 33.3% and 35.0%, respectively. The Education Group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in Rubric scores (p=0.030, rrb =0.390) and self-confidence levels (p=0.005, rrb =0.512) compared to the Control Group. Intra-group analysis revealed that application times increased significantly in both the Education (p<0.001, rrb =0.983) and Control groups (p<0.001, rrb =1.000). While absolute real pressure error improved significantly within the Education Group (p=0.024, rrb=0.581), no significant inter-group difference was found for pressure-related variables (p>0.05). Notably, in the Education Group, self-confidence showed a strong positive correlation with Rubric scores (rho= 0.619, p=0.003) and a significant negative moderate correlation with absolute real pressure error (rho: -0.408, p=0.037). In contrast, no significant correlation was found between confidence and technical performance in the Control Group, suggesting a tendency toward overconfidence.

Conclusion: Supervised training with objective feedback is superior to passive learning for mastering the complex psychomotor skill of multilayer inelastic bandaging. While theoretical instruction may artificially inflate self-confidence, it fails to bridge the experience paradox which perceived competence masks technical insufficiency. Integrating real-time biofeedback into physiotherapy curricula is essential to ensure sensory calibration, technical proficiency, and patient safety, transitioning students from conceptual understanding to objective clinical mastery.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

41

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Central
      • Bolu, Central, 터키 (Türkiye), 14030
        • Bolu abant Izzet Baysal University

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 어린이
  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteering to participate
  • Being a student in the department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation
  • Being in the fourth year of study
  • Having completed the Prosthetics and Rehabilitation course to ensure proficiency in the figure-of-eight bandaging technique.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having any orthopedic or neurological disease that hinders upper extremity function, particularly hand use
  • Presence of acute trauma to the upper extremity or hand
  • Having a known allergy to compression materials, as students performed bandaging practices on one another.
  • Students who had received any training or courses on compression bandaging prior to or outside of the 'Prosthetics and Rehabilitation' course

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 다른
  • 할당: 무작위화되지 않음
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Supervised Education Group

The supervised intervention consisted of a 3-hour session led by a lymphedema therapist with 14 years of experience. Training was conducted in groups of 5-9 students using peer-to-peer practice. The program included:

Theory: Instruction on inelastic bandage properties, Laplace's Law, and pressure distribution principles.

Demonstration: A step-by-step showcase of multi-layer below-knee bandaging, including stirrup and figure-of-eight techniques.

Practice: Students practiced on peers in a supine position. Biofeedback: To master therapeutic pressure, students utilized the Kikuhime device for real-time monitoring. The instructor provided individual corrections for each application.

This structured approach aimed to calibrate students' tactile perception and ensure technical mastery through expert supervision and objective feedback.

The supervised intervention consisted of a 3-hour session led by a lymphedema therapist with 14 years of experience. Training was conducted in groups of 5-9 students using peer-to-peer practice. The program included:

Theory: Instruction on inelastic bandage properties, Laplace's Law, and pressure distribution principles.

Demonstration: A step-by-step showcase of multi-layer below-knee bandaging, including stirrup and figure-of-eight techniques.

Practice: Students practiced on peers in a supine position. Biofeedback: To master therapeutic pressure, students utilized the Kikuhime device for real-time monitoring. The instructor provided individual corrections for each application.

This structured approach aimed to calibrate students' tactile perception and ensure technical mastery through expert supervision and objective feedback.

활성 비교기: Control group
The control group was provided with a brochure detailing how to perform the bandaging. All technical details provided in the supervised training were included in this brochure. Visuals were used to demonstrate the final appearance of the stirrup technique, starting and ending positions, and the positioning of both the patient and the ankle. Great care was taken to ensure that the visuals and descriptions were simple, clear, and explanatory. After the brochure was distributed, any points of confusion were clarified for the students
The control group was provided with a brochure detailing how to perform the bandaging. All technical details provided in the supervised training were included in this brochure. Visuals were used to demonstrate the final appearance of the stirrup technique, starting and ending positions, and the positioning of both the patient and the ankle. Great care was taken to ensure that the visuals and descriptions were simple, clear, and explanatory. After the brochure was distributed, any points of confusion were clarified for the students

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Bandaging Skills
기간: Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
A Bandaging Skills Rubric was developed to objectively evaluate bandaging proficiency. To prevent bias, the rubric assessments were performed by a researcher who did not provide the training and who was specifically trained on each rubric criterion. The rubric consisted of 5 criteria, each rated on a 3-point scale: Inadequate (1 point), Satisfactory (2 points), and Proficient (3 points). The minimum and maximum possible scores for the rubric are 5 and 15, respectively. Higher rubric scores indicate superior bandaging technique and quality.
Baseline, and immediately after the intervention

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Bandage Interface Pressure
기간: Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
The students were instructed to apply the bandages within a pressure range of 35-45 mmHg. Following the completion of the bandaging procedure, the interface pressure values at rest were recorded from B1 point (transition point of gastrocnemius tendon to muscle, from medial aspect of leg) in mmHg.
Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
Absolute real pressure error
기간: Baseline, and immediately after the intervention

To determine how much the participants deviated from the desired pressure-that is, to find the actual error-calculations were performed before and after the application according to the following formula:

Absolute error = |Pre-training interface pressure/Post-training interface pressure - Desired mean bandage pressure (40 mmHg)| These values were recorded as mmHg.

Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
Perceived Interface Pressure
기간: Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
Physiotherapy students were asked to estimate the pressure they applied before and after the training, and their estimations were recorded in mmHg.
Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
Perceived pressure error
기간: Baseline, and immediately after the intervention

the perceived error was calculated for both pre- and post-training applications. The perceived error was calculated with the formula.

Perceived error = |Pre-training perceived mean interface pressure/ Post-training perceived mean interface pressure - Pre-training interface pressure/ Post-training interface|. The perceived error was recorded as mmHg.

Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
Confidence in Bandage Application
기간: Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
The students' confidence in bandage application was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The students were asked how confident they felt in achieving the desired compression bandage pressure, and they were requested to mark their level of confidence on the VAS . A score of '0' represented 'not confident at all,' while '10' represented 'highly confident.' The marked point was measured with a ruler and recorded in centimeters
Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
Bandage application time
기간: Baseline, and immediately after the intervention
The bandage application time was recorded in seconds before and after the training.
Baseline, and immediately after the intervention

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Elif DUYGU-YILDIZ, Abant Izzet Baysal University

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

  • 1. Trayes KP, Studdiford JS, Pickle S, Tully AS. Edema: diagnosis and management. American family physician. 2013;88:102-10. 2. Gasparis AP, Kim PS, Dean SM, Khilnani NM, Labropoulos N. Diagnostic approach to lower limb edema. Phlebology. 2020;35:650-5. 3. Michelini S, Failla A, Moneta G, Fiorentino A, Marco C. Peripheral Edema: differential diagnosis. In: Inflammation in the 21st Century. IntechOpen; 2020. 4. Miller CL, Colwell AS, Horick N, Skolny MN, Jammallo LS, O'Toole JA, et al. Immediate implant reconstruction is associated with a reduced risk of lymphedema compared to mastectomy alone: A prospective cohort study. Annals of surgery. 2016;263:399. 5. Klein I, Tidhar D, Kalichman L. Lymphatic treatments after orthopedic surgery or injury: a systematic review. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2020;24:109-17. 6. de Almeida Alcantara DA, Dos Santos FNA, de Almeida Ferreira JJ, de Noronha M, de Andrade PR. The effect of kinesiotaping on edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2024;:103168. 7. Feger MA, Goetschius J, Love H, Saliba SA, Hertel J. Electrical stimulation as a treatment intervention to improve function, edema or pain following acute lateral ankle sprains: A systematic review. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2015;16:361-9. 8. Wang Z-R, Ni G-X. Is it time to put traditional cold therapy in rehabilitation of soft-tissue injuries out to pasture? World journal of clinical cases. 2021;9:4116. 9. Patel H, Skok CC, DeMarco A. Peripheral edema: evaluation and management in primary care. American Family Physician. 2022;106:557-64. 10. Sun C-R, Liu M-Y, Ni Q-H, Cai F, Tang F, Yu Z-Y, et al. Clinical Guidelines on Compression Therapy in Venous Diseases. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2024. 11. Partsch H, Rockson SG. Compression therapy. Lymphedema: A Concise Compendium of Theory and Practice. 2018;:431-41. 12. Partsch H. Compression therapy: clinical and experimental evidence. Annals of vascular diseases. 2012;:ra-12.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2025년 9월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2026년 4월 30일

연구 완료 (실제)

2026년 4월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 5월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 5월 11일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 18일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 18일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 5월 11일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

미정

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

물리 치료에 대한 임상 시험

Supervised Education Group에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다