이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Periodontitis and Monitoring Gingival Inflammation

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Periodontitis Diagnosis and Gingival Inflammation Monitoring at Tooth and Patient Levels: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Background and Objective:

Periodontitis and gingivitis are highly prevalent oral diseases that require accurate diagnostic classification and continuous gingival health monitoring. This study aims to develop, internally validate, and externally evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for periodontitis staging and gingival inflammation assessment at both tooth and patient levels.

Study Design:

This is a multi-center observational study utilizing a large-scale primary clinical dataset for model development. To rigorously evaluate the generalizability of the trained AI models, two distinct pathways of independent external validation will be implemented across multiple clinical sites.

Research Phases & Validation Architecture:

Phase 1 (Periodontitis Diagnosis via Probing): Development of an AI model to diagnose periodontitis (binary classification: stage 0/I vs. stage II/III/IV) at both tooth and patient levels, using comprehensive clinical periodontal probing as the gold standard. External Validation I will be performed using an independent cohort from another campus of the primary hospital to test the model's diagnostic accuracy.

Phase 2 (Periodontitis Diagnosis via Radiographs): Development of an AI model to diagnose periodontitis (binary classification: stage 0/I vs. stage II/III/IV) at both tooth and patient levels, using digital panoramic radiographs as the reference standard. External Validation II will be conducted using distinct, independent image datasets acquired from two separate regional hospitals to evaluate geographic generalizability.

Phase 3 (Gingival Inflammation Monitoring): Development of an AI model to monitor and assess gingival inflammation at both tooth and patient levels, based on Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) as the gold standard. This model's performance will also be evaluated through External Validation I using the independent dataset from the primary hospital's alternative campus.

Significance:

By validating the AI models across varied institutional workflows and imaging systems, this study will provide high-level evidence on the clinical utility and robustness of AI-driven digital systems for automated periodontal screening and long-term health monitoring.

연구 개요

상태

모집하지 않고 적극적으로

정황

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (추정된)

900

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Shanghai, 중국
        • Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

The study population consists of adult patients who sought routine dental care or periodontal evaluation at the primary medical center (including its main campus and an alternative secondary campus) and two independent regional hospitals. This multi-center population reflects a real-world, diverse clinical screening pool of patients presenting with varying degrees of periodontal health, ranging from completely healthy gingiva to severe, advanced periodontitis. Eligible participants are identified based on the availability of concurrent full-mouth clinical periodontal charting and digital panoramic radiographs.

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged > 18 years at the time of their clinical periodontal examination.
  2. Availability of complete full-mouth periodontal charting records, which must include Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) documented at 6 sites per tooth.
  3. Availability of a digital panoramic radiograph of acceptable diagnostic quality, taken within one months of the clinical periodontal examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are completely edentulous or those who have undergone full-arch dental implant rehabilitation (not applicable for natural teeth periodontitis staging).
  2. Panoramic radiographs with severe image degradation, including major motion artifacts, severe positioning errors, or poor contrast/exposure that obscures the alveolar bone crest.
  3. Presence of extensive metal artifacts or massive bilateral multiple fixed crowns/bridges that completely shadow the marginal bone level of interest.
  4. Incomplete clinical electronic medical records or missing core diagnostic descriptors required to establish the clinical gold standard for periodontitis staging or gingival inflammation.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

코호트 및 개입

그룹/코호트
개입 / 치료
Multi-center Periodontal AI Development and Validation Cohort

Development Dataset (Primary Campus): Large-scale data used for the initial training and internal validation of the AI algorithms.

External Validation Dataset I (Secondary Campus): An independent dataset from an alternative campus of the primary hospital, used to validate clinical probing-based periodontitis diagnosis (Phase 1) and gingival inflammation monitoring (Phase 3).

External Validation Dataset II (Two Regional Hospitals): Separate imaging datasets from two distinct regional medical centers, used to validate radiograph-based periodontitis diagnosis (Phase 2).

The intervention evaluated in this observational study is the deployment of deep learning/artificial intelligence (AI) software models.

The AI algorithms process two streams of standard clinical data to perform three automated diagnostic tasks without altering patient care:

Automated classification of periodontitis stages (Stage 0/I vs. Stage II/III/IV) utilizing full-mouth clinical charting metrics.

Automated classification of periodontitis stages (Stage 0/I vs. Stage II/III/IV) utilizing digital panoramic radiographs.

Automated assessment and monitoring of gingival inflammation flags based on Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) patterns.

The outputs of these AI models will be directly compared against clinical and radiographic gold standards to calculate diagnostic accuracy metrics.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Diagnostic Accuracy of the AI Model for Probing-Based Periodontitis Staging
기간: Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
The diagnostic performance of the deep learning AI model in classifying periodontitis stages (binary classification: Stage 0/I vs. Stage II/III/IV) at both individual tooth and patient levels, using comprehensive clinical periodontal probing as the gold standard. Performance will be evaluated using the internal development dataset and verified using External Validation Dataset I (secondary campus data). Metrics will include Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), Sensitivity, Specificity, and F1-score.
Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
Diagnostic Accuracy of the AI Model for Radiograph-Based Periodontitis Staging
기간: Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
The diagnostic performance of the deep learning AI model in classifying periodontitis stages (binary classification: Stage 0/I vs. Stage II/III/IV) at both individual tooth and patient levels, using digital panoramic radiographs as the reference standard. Performance will be evaluated using the internal development dataset and verified using External Validation Dataset II (multi-center data from two separate regional hospitals). Metrics will include Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), Sensitivity, Specificity, and F1-score.
Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
Diagnostic Accuracy of the AI Model for Gingival Inflammation Monitoring
기간: Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))
The performance of the deep learning AI model in detecting and monitoring gingival inflammation flags at both individual tooth and patient levels, using Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) metrics as the clinical gold standard. Performance will be evaluated using the internal development dataset and verified using External Validation Dataset I (secondary campus data). Metrics will include Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV).
Baseline (At a single point in time for each participant (cross-sectional assessment))

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2025년 9월 10일

기본 완료 (실제)

2026년 3월 10일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2026년 9월 10일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 6월 1일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 6월 4일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 6월 5일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 6월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 6월 4일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 6월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • SH9H-2025-T196-4

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

치주 질환에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다