Patient Aid for Theory-Driven Health Communication (PATH): Translating Goal-Power Theory Into an Instrument and Generative AI Support for Palliative Care Communication
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-supported communication tool can help improve communication between people receiving palliative care and their healthcare providers. The study will also evaluate a new questionnaire designed to measure the quality of healthcare communication.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Can the new questionnaire accurately measure the quality of communication between participants and healthcare providers?
- Does using the AI-supported communication tool, called NurseChat+, help participants feel more confident and prepared before meeting with their healthcare team?
- Does NurseChat+ improve the quality of communication during palliative care visits?
Researchers will compare participants who use NurseChat+ together with their usual care to participants who receive usual care alone to see whether the tool improves communication outcomes.
The study will be conducted in three stages. First, researchers will develop and test a questionnaire that measures healthcare communication. Next, they will develop and refine the NurseChat+ tool. Finally, they will test the tool in adults receiving palliative care at National Taiwan University Hospital.
Participants in the final stage of the study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will use NurseChat+ before their scheduled medical visits in addition to receiving usual care, while the other group will receive usual care only. Participants will complete questionnaires about their communication experiences during the study.
연구 개요
상세 설명
Effective health communication is essential to patient well-being, yet the field is constrained by major theoretical and methodological gaps. Existing theories tend to address isolated communication phenomena and lack an integrative framework spanning the full continuum of patient-provider interaction. As a result, many measurement instruments lack a clear theoretical foundation and demonstrate inconsistent psychometric quality. In parallel, most AI-supported communication tools are technology-driven rather than theory-driven, and few have undergone rigorous clinical evaluation. Palliative care represents a high-stakes clinical context in which communication quality is central to outcomes, making it an ideal setting to test theory-based generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) communication interventions.
Grounded in the Goal-Power Theory of Communication developed by the applicant, this four-year project adopts a mixed-methods design to develop and evaluate a theory-based communication measurement instrument and a GenAI-supported communication aid, NurseChat+. The project comprises three sequential phases: (1) instrument development and validation, (2) intervention development and pilot testing, and (3) clinical evaluation using a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Phase 1 aims to develop and psychometrically validate a theory-based instrument for assessing health communication quality. Instrument development and validation will follow the MEASURE framework, including expert content validation and field testing with approximately 500 participants recruited from clinical settings within the National Taiwan University Hospital system. Phase 2 aims to develop and preliminarily validate the NurseChat+ using a user-centered design approach. A pilot usability and feasibility study will be conducted using a one-group pretest-posttest design with a minimum of 20 healthy adults to assess acceptability, usability, and preliminary effects on communication self-efficacy. Phase 3 will conduct a parallel-group, superiority RCT with an embedded mixed-methods design in palliative care outpatient and home care settings at National Taiwan University Hospital. Eligible adult patients receiving palliative care will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group (NurseChat+ plus usual care) or the control group (usual care alone). The target sample size is 240 participants (120 per group). Intervention participants will use NurseChat+ prior to scheduled medical encounters.
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Chia-Chun Tang, PhD
- 전화번호: 886-905925300
- 이메일: chiatang@ntu.edu.tw
연구 장소
-
-
-
Taipei, 대만
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
연락하다:
- Clinical Trial Center
- 전화번호: 886-233668656
- 이메일: rmcore@ntuh.gov.tw
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Patients (Self-responding)
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older.
- Diagnosed with an advanced disease requiring consultation with outpatient palliative care clinics or home care services.
- Able to self-complete the study questionnaires.
Exclusion Criteria:
-None
Group 2: Caregivers (Proxy-responding) (Invited only when the patient meets the clinical criteria but is unable to self-complete the questionnaires)
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older.
- Identified as the primary family caregiver of a patient with an advanced disease requiring palliative care.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Professional or paid caregivers.
- Unable to complete the study questionnaires.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: NurseChat+ plus usual care
Participants in the experimental group will be invited to interact with NurseChat+ on an iPad provided by the research team before beginning their medical consultation.
Successful completion of the intervention is defined as either a minimum of ten minutes of NurseChat+ use or completion of a full round of patient input, data retrieval, and response generation
|
Participants will use NurseChat+, a generative AI-supported communication tool, before scheduled palliative care visits to help prepare questions and concerns for discussion with healthcare providers.
The intervention is provided in addition to usual care.
|
|
간섭 없음: Usual Care
Participants in the control group will receive usual palliative care without access to the NurseChat+ intervention.
Usual care includes standard clinical consultations and communication with healthcare providers as provided in routine practice.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Communication Self-Efficacy via the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interaction Scale (PEPPI-5)
기간: Baseline (T0: within 12 hours prior to the scheduled consultation) and Post-test (T1: immediately following the medical consultation or the interaction with GenAI communication aid).
|
【Randomized Control Trial & Pilot study】The PEPPI-5 is a 5-item self-report instrument used to measure a patient's perceived self-efficacy in communicating with their physician.
Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (very confident).
The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating higher levels of communication self-efficacy.
Outcome will be assessed as the change in scores from T0 to T1.
|
Baseline (T0: within 12 hours prior to the scheduled consultation) and Post-test (T1: immediately following the medical consultation or the interaction with GenAI communication aid).
|
|
Quality of Health Communication via the Phase-One Developed Instrument
기간: Post-test follow-up (T1: 24-72 hours after the consultation via telephone interview).
|
Evaluated using a newly developed and validated communication-quality instrument generated in Phase One of the study. This instrument is designed to comprehensively assess the specific communication quality, patterns, and clinical encounter effectiveness between healthcare providers and palliative care patients/families when aided by GenAI communication aid. The instrument is currently undergoing development and psychometric validation. The finalized total score will be structured such that higher scores will mathematically indicate a superior quality of health communication and better communication patterns. |
Post-test follow-up (T1: 24-72 hours after the consultation via telephone interview).
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
System Usability Scale (SUS) Score of NurseChat+
기간: Post-test (immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid).
|
【Pilot study】The UEQ contains 26 pairs of contrasting adjectives used to evaluate the user experience of NurseChat+ across 6 scales (Attractiveness, Perspicuity, Efficiency, Dependability, Stimulation, and Novelty).
Each item is scored on a 7-point scale ranging from -3 (horrible/extremely bad) to +3 (excellent/extremely good).
Scores above 0.8 represent a positive evaluation.
|
Post-test (immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid).
|
|
Inventory of Technology Acceptance Model (ITAM) Score
기간: Post-test ( immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid)
|
【Pilot study】The ITAM assesses user acceptance, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use regarding the NurseChat+ GenAI system.
Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1(strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agre), with higher total scores indicating a higher intention to adopt and greater acceptance of the technology.
|
Post-test ( immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid)
|
|
Evaluation of User Experience via the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)
기간: Post-test (immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid)
|
【Pilot study】The UEQ is a 26-item semantic differential scale used to provide a holistic assessment of the user experience of NurseChat+. It measures both pragmatic qualities (efficiency, perspicuity, dependability) and hedonic qualities (stimulation, novelty), along with overall attractiveness. Each item consists of a pair of contrasting adjectives rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7. For analysis, responses are transformed to range from -3 (horribly bad) to +3 (extremely good), where 0 represents a neutral evaluation. Higher positive values reflect a superior user experience, and scale scores above 0.8 generally indicate a positive evaluation. |
Post-test (immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid)
|
|
Improvement in Symptom Burden via the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)
기간: Baseline (T0: within 12 hours prior to the scheduled consultation) and Post-test (T1: post-consultation follow-up within 24-72 hours).
|
【Randomized Control Trial】The ESAS is a validated tool designed to assess 9 common symptoms in palliative care patients (pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, appetite, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, and wellbeing).
Each symptom is rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom).
The total distress score ranges from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating a higher symptom burden.
|
Baseline (T0: within 12 hours prior to the scheduled consultation) and Post-test (T1: post-consultation follow-up within 24-72 hours).
|
|
Patient Overall and Communication Satisfaction via the Chinese Patients' Satisfaction Scale (C-PSS)
기간: Post-test follow-up (T1: 24-72 hours after the consultation via telephone interview).
|
【Randomized Control Trial】The C-PSS is a 27-item instrument validated in Taiwan's outpatient population, assessing 6 dimensions: efficiency, fairness, chin-chieh (kindness), professionalism, responsibility, and respect.
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
With reverse-scored items appropriately adjusted, total scores are aggregated, where higher total scores indicate greater patient communication and overall satisfaction with the clinical encounter.
|
Post-test follow-up (T1: 24-72 hours after the consultation via telephone interview).
|
|
Patient Satisfaction with Decision Making via the Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Scale
기간: Post-test follow-up (T1: 24-72 hours after the consultation via telephone interview).
|
【Randomized Control Trial】The Chinese version of the SWD is a 6-item questionnaire designed to assess a patient's satisfaction with the healthcare decision-making process and its clinical outcomes.
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale.
Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of satisfaction and agreement with the decisions made during the medical consultation.
|
Post-test follow-up (T1: 24-72 hours after the consultation via telephone interview).
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 202602057RINB
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .