이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Evaluation of a Remote Behavioural Stress Recovery Intervention for Myocardial Infarction Patients Younger Than Fifty-five (BRIM-55): A Feasibility Study (BRIM-55)

2026년 7월 15일 업데이트: Erik Olsson, Uppsala University

The goal of this feasibility study is to learn if the randomised controlled trial evaluating the Remote-delivery Balance in Everyday Life (rBEL) programme for adults younger than 55 years who have experienced a myocardial infarction (MI), is feasible.

The objective is to examine the feasibility of the rBEL programme and the associated study procedures before a controlled evaluation of the programme. This is an uncontrolled, single-arm, pre-post treatment designed study.

Participants of the target population will take part of the six session over 13 week programme. Feasibility will be evaluated against predefined feasibility criteria regarding study procedures and programme acceptability.

연구 개요

상세 설명

BACKGROUND Even though there have been major improvements in medical treatments resulting in considerably lower mortality rates, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of death and the main cause of loss of disability-adjusted life-years worldwide. Myocardial infarction (MI) is the most common of the serious CVDs. While the total number of MIs has decreased during the last decades, the proportion of young patients hospitalized with MI has increased.

Cardiac distress (CD) summaries the psychological impacts of a cardiac event and expands on the general "psychological distress" concept (i.e. symptoms of depression and anxiety). Cardiac distress is common after an MI. For young persons, having an MI is particularly stressful and the prevalence of anxiety and depression is more than double compared to that of older patients.

Conventional stress management intervention programs are based on a "reactivity paradigm", with techniques used to reduce, avoid, or change the interpretation of the stressors and/or stress responses associated with distress. An alternative, contrasting strategy is to address recovery processes. To the best of our knowledge, the intervention program Balance in Everyday Life (BEL), based on cognitive behavioural principles, has the best empirical support.

Guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation recommend screening of psychosocial aspects but interventions in this area are very rare in clinical practice.

METHOD Aim The aims are to assess feasibility and acceptability of the iBEL program for post-myocardial infarction survivors aged below 55 years reported ongoing CD, and the study procedures of the later evaluation study.

Research Questions

  1. How feasible is the study procedures of the planned evaluation study in terms of recruitment, retention and adherence rates?
  2. To what extent is the iBEL program perceived as acceptable to young post-MI survivors, in terms of its content, delivery method and relevancy?

Design An uncontrolled, single-arm, pre-post treatment design.

Participants Thirty participants of the target population will be included. Exclusion criteria: (i) not being able to read, write or speak Swedish, (ii) being able to use the digital device necessary for participation and (iii) early retirement or disability pension at the time of the MI.

Procedure Participants will be recruited via a register extraction from SWEDEHEART of all persons having an MI before the age of 55 one year before intervention start. Preliminary eligible participants will be sent an invitation letter primarily via a digital post-box with a description of the study and an option to register interest for the study. To qualify as participants with CD, they must state they have at least experienced moderate distress as a consequence of their MI which impairs day-to-day recovery, and they believe psychological support will benefit them. They are then asked to provide written consent.

The Program The program consists of 6 sessions spread out over 13 weeks. Each session includes a video-call meeting online, via the platform Zoom, with a therapist. The therapists are healthcare workers (clinical social workers-LCSW, MSW specialized in psychotherapy, nurses psychiatric/mental health nurse practitioners- PMHNPs, occupational therapists with mental health specialization) with training in clinical conversations or students recruited from the final semesters of the university programs for psychologists or physiotherapists with basic training in clinical conversations. They will be trained in the rBEL program and receive supervision by a senior therapist. Before each data collection time-point, participants will be prompted and, if necessary, reminded to report via SMS and/or e-mail, based on their preference, and thereafter, if needed, via telephone.

In addition to this meeting with the therapist there is psychoeducational material on a website (www.brim55.se) and a printed booklet for exercise notations.

Data analysis The feasibility results will be evaluated against pre-specified progression criteria. The sample size (N=30) is based on a rule-of-thumb for feasibility studies and is judged to be enough for detecting feasibility concerns.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

30

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

      • Uppsala, 스웨덴, 752 37
        • Uppsala University
        • 연락하다:

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion criteria:

  • Myocardial infarction (MI) before age 55 years
  • MI within one year prior to randomization
  • Report of subjective cardiac distress in the initial interview

Exclusion criteria:

  • Serious conditions hindering participation (e.g., active substance misuse, severe mental illness)
  • Insufficient Swedish proficiency for study procedures,
  • Disability pension or early retirement at the time of MI

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Remote-delivery Balance in Everyday Life (rBEL) intervention group
Participants randomized to this arm will receive the Remote-delivery Balance in Everyday Life (rBEL) program, a therapist-supported behavioral stress recovery intervention delivered over 12 weeks. The program includes six individual online sessions, a printed workbook containing exercises and self-monitoring materials, and access to online video resources. The intervention is designed to promote recovery behaviors, improve stress regulation, and reduce cardiac distress following myocardial infarction.
The Remote-delivery Balance in Everyday Life (rBEL) program is a 13-week therapist-supported behavioral stress recovery intervention for adults younger than 55 years who have experienced a myocardial infarction and report cardiac distress. The program includes six individual online sessions delivered by a therapist, a printed exercise workbook, and online video materials. The content focuses on recovery behaviors, relaxation training, self-monitoring, use of recovery strategies in daily life and work settings, and management of heart-related worry and anxiety.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Recruitment
기간: Six weeks from when the invitation letter was sent out

The pre-specified progression criteria are formulated as Green=Go ahead, Yellow=Amend, Red=Revise.

Green: ≥8% of the invited population starting intervention. Yellow: <8% and ≥6%. Red: <6%.

Six weeks from when the invitation letter was sent out
Acceptability
기간: Four weeks from the screening interview

The pre-specified progression criteria are formulated as Green=Go ahead, Yellow=Amend, Red=Revise.

Green: ≥75% of eligible participants consent. Yellow: <75% and ≥60%. Red: <60%.

Four weeks from the screening interview
Participant adherence
기간: From start of intervention to 12 weeks later.

The pre-specified progression criteria are formulated as Green=Go ahead, Yellow=Amend, Red=Revise.

Green: ≥70% of the participants completing a minimum of 4 sessions with the therapist.

Yellow:<70% and ≥60%. Red: <60%

From start of intervention to 12 weeks later.
Retention
기간: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.

The pre-specified progression criteria are formulated as Green=Go ahead, Yellow=Amend, Red=Revise.

Green: ≥90% complete data on the CDI, post-treatment. Yellow: <90% and ≥75%. Red: <75%.

From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Adverse events
기간: From intervention start to four weeks after intervention end.

The pre-specified progression criteria are formulated as Green=Go ahead, Yellow=Amend, Red=Revise.

Green: no inconveniences or adverse events linked to study participation reported.

Yellow: ≤ 2 reports of inconveniences (comparable to max 2 days of increased fatigue, stress or worry).

Red: any adverse event or more than 3 inconveniences reported linked to study participation

From intervention start to four weeks after intervention end.
Program credibility
기간: Rating is done after first intervention session (first week of intervention). A two week submission period is allowed.

The pre-specified progression criteria are formulated as Green=Go ahead, Yellow=Amend, Red=Revise. The credibility subscale of the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire has a max score of 27. A higher score means more credibility.

Green: ≥75% of participants rate the credibility subscale of CEQ ≥ 7. Yellow: ≥75% rate it < 7 and ≥ 5. Red: >25% rate it < 5.

Rating is done after first intervention session (first week of intervention). A two week submission period is allowed.
Program satisfaction
기간: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.

The pre-specified progression criteria are formulated as Green=Go ahead, Yellow=Amend, Red=Revise. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8 items version (CSQ-8) has a max score of 32 where a higher score means more satisfaction.

Green: ≥ 75% of participants score ≥26 on the CSQ-8. Yellow: ≥ 75% rate it ≥24. Red: > 25% rate it <24.

From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Cardiac distress
기간: Mid intervention (CDI short form): After session 3 (2 week submission period) After intervention: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI)
Mid intervention (CDI short form): After session 3 (2 week submission period) After intervention: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Recovery Experience
기간: Mid intervention: After session 3 (2 week submission time frame). After intervention: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
The Recovery Experience Questionnaire (REQ) has a max score of 80 where a higher score means more recovery.
Mid intervention: After session 3 (2 week submission time frame). After intervention: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Health-related quality of life
기간: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
The HeartQoL instrument has a max score of 42 where a higher score means better quality of life.
From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Depression
기간: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
The Patient Health Questionnaire, 9 items (PHQ-9) has a max score of 27. A higher score means more depressed.
From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Anxiety
기간: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
The instrument General Anxiety Disorder, 7 items version (GAD-7) has a max score of 21. A higher score means more anxiety.
From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Working ability
기간: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Work Ability Index has a max score of 49 where a higher score means better working ability.
From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
Healthcare costs
기간: From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.
The instrument Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders, Midi version (TIC-P Midi) counts visits in health care. The more visits the higher the costs. Visits to specialists and hospital stays means higher costs than outpatient visits.
From the end of the intervention to two weeks later.

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Erik Olsson MG Olsson, Professor, Uppsala University

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 8월 24일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 1월 31일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 6월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 7월 2일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 15일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 16일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 16일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 15일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

IPD 계획 설명

Due to the European data protection law, this will not be allowed without a special ethical approval.

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다