이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

One-Page Truth-Telling Aid for Cancer Disclosure

2026년 7월 22일 업데이트: Shih-Ying Chen, Chang Gung University

A One-Page Truth-Telling Aid for Cancer Disclosure in Taiwan: A Two-Arm Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a one-page communication aid can improve communication between physicians and patients with cancer during cancer-related truth-telling consultations. The one-page aid is designed to help physicians quickly understand patients' preferences and needs before the consultation.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the one-page communication aid improve patients' satisfaction with how cancer-related information is explained?
  • Does the one-page communication aid reduce patients' emotional distress after the consultation?
  • Does the one-page communication aid improve physicians' confidence in communicating cancer-related information?

Researchers will compare patients whose physicians receive the one-page communication aid with patients whose physicians provide usual care with a blank sheet for patients to write down questions. This comparison will help determine whether the one-page aid improves communication, emotional outcomes, and physician confidence.

Participants will:

  • Complete questionnaires before and after the consultation
  • Receive either the one-page communication aid or a blank sheet, depending on their physician's group
  • Complete follow-up questionnaires at 3 months and 6 months after the consultation

Physicians will also complete brief questionnaires about their communication confidence at baseline, 1 week after recruitment of their first enrolled patient, 3 months, and 6 months.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Cancer-related truth-telling is an important but challenging part of oncology care. Patients may differ in how much information they want to receive, how they prefer information to be explained, who they want to be present during the discussion, and what questions or concerns they wish to raise. In routine outpatient settings, physicians often have limited time to identify these individual preferences before discussing cancer-related information.

This study will evaluate a One-Page Truth-Telling Aid designed to help physicians quickly understand patients' disclosure preferences and communication needs before the consultation. The aid is completed with patients before the visit and summarizes key information for the physician, including the patient's preferred way of receiving information, preferred communication style, desired content, and questions the patient would like to ask.

This is a two-arm, single-blind, pragmatic clinical trial. Participating physicians will be assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. Patients will be allocated according to the group assignment of their participating physician. Patients in the experimental group will complete the One-Page Truth-Telling Aid before the consultation and will be encouraged to provide it to their physician at the beginning of the visit. Patients in the control group will receive a blank sheet that they may use to write down questions before the consultation.

The study will assess patient-reported truth-telling experiences, emotional distress, and decisional regret, as well as physician-reported communication confidence. Patient assessments will be conducted before the consultation, immediately after the consultation, and at 3 and 6 months after the consultation. Physician assessments will be conducted before the intervention, 1 week after recruitment of their first enrolled patient, and at 3 and 6 months thereafter.

The study is expected to provide evidence on whether a brief, low-burden communication aid can support patient-centered truth-telling in oncology outpatient care and improve communication-related outcomes for both patients and physicians.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

400

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

      • Taoyuan, 대만, 33302
        • 모병
        • Chang Gung University
        • 연락하다:
        • 수석 연구원:
          • Shih-Ying Chen, PhD

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 어린이
  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

【Physicians】

  • Inclusion Criteria:

    • Physicians who provide clinical care for patients with cancer in participating outpatient departments.
    • Physicians who are involved in cancer-related truth-telling or disclosure consultations.
    • Physicians who are willing to participate and provide informed consent.
  • Exclusion Criteria:

    • Physicians who are unable or unwilling to complete study procedures or follow-up assessments.

【Patients】

  • Inclusion Criteria:

    • Patients diagnosed with cancer.
    • Patients who are scheduled to receive cancer-related information from a participating physician, including information about diagnosis, recurrence, metastasis, end-of-life status.
    • Patients who are able to communicate in Mandarin Chinese or Taiwanese.
    • Patients who are able to complete questionnaires independently or with assistance from the research assistant.
    • Patients who are willing to participate and provide informed consent.
  • Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent.
    • Patients with severe cognitive impairment, severe physical illness, or emotional distress that prevents participation, as judged by the clinical team or research staff.
    • Patients who are unable to complete the study questionnaires even with assistance.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: One-Page Truth-Telling Aid
Patients in this arm will receive the One-Page Truth-Telling Aid before the truth-telling consultation. The aid will be completed with the patient before the visit and summarizes the patient's disclosure preferences, communication needs, and questions for the physician. Patients will be encouraged to provide the aid to their participating physician at the beginning of the consultation so that the physician can quickly understand the patient's preferences and tailor communication accordingly.
The One-Page Truth-Telling Aid is a brief communication aid completed with patients before the consultation. It summarizes patients' disclosure preferences, communication needs, and questions for the physician. Patients are encouraged to provide the aid to their participating physician at the beginning of the consultation to support patient-centered communication.
활성 비교기: Blank Sheet
Patients in this arm will receive a blank sheet before the truth-telling consultation. The blank sheet may be used to write down questions or concerns the patient would like to discuss with the physician. It does not include structured questions about disclosure preferences or communication needs. Patients will receive usual care and may choose whether to provide the blank sheet to their participating physician during the consultation.
The blank sheet is provided to patients before the consultation and may be used to write down questions or concerns. It does not include structured questions about disclosure preferences or communication needs.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Patients' Truth-Telling Preferences and Perceptions
기간: Baseline, immediately after the truth-telling consultation, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Patients' truth-telling preferences and perceptions of physicians' actual disclosure practices will be assessed using the 43-item Truth-Telling Questionnaire (TTQ-43). The TTQ-43 includes four domains: how to deliver bad news, emotional support, additional information, and setting. Items are scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating stronger preferences expectation at baseline or greater perceived alignment with physician practice at follow-up.
Baseline, immediately after the truth-telling consultation, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Patients' Psychological Distress
기간: Baseline, immediately after the truth-telling consultation, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention

Patients' psychological distress will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). The DASS-21 includes three subscales: depression, anxiety, and stress. Each subscale score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Patients' psychological distress will also be assessed using the Distress Thermometer (DT), a single-item distress screening tool. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater distress. A score of 4 or higher indicates clinically relevant distress.

Baseline, immediately after the truth-telling consultation, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Physicians' Confidence in Communication
기간: Baseline, 1 week after recruitment of the physician's first enrolled patient, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Physicians' confidence in communication with patients with cancer and their families will be assessed using the 21-item Confidence in Communication with Patients questionnaire. Items are scored from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
Baseline, 1 week after recruitment of the physician's first enrolled patient, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Patients' Decision Regret
기간: 3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention
Patients' regret regarding their treatment decisions will be assessed using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater decisional regret. A score greater than 25 indicates moderate to high decisional regret.
3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention
Treatment-Related Adverse Events
기간: 3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention
Treatment-related adverse events will be evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0) based on electronic health record data. Events are graded from 1 to 5, with higher grades indicating more severe adverse events.
3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention
Medical Expenditure
기간: 6 months post-intervention
Medical expenditure will be estimated using National Health Insurance points recorded in the electronic health record system, based on the local conversion basis in Taiwan.
6 months post-intervention
Physicians' Perceived Usefulness of the One-Page Truth-Telling Aid
기간: 1 week after recruitment of the physician's first enrolled patient, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Physicians' perceived usefulness of the One-Page Truth-Telling Aid will be assessed using a single-item rating scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater perceived usefulness.
1 week after recruitment of the physician's first enrolled patient, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Physicians' Willingness to Recommend the One-Page Truth-Telling Aid
기간: 1 week after recruitment of the physician's first enrolled patient, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Physicians' willingness to recommend the One-Page Truth-Telling Aid will be assessed using a single-item rating scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater willingness to recommend the aid.
1 week after recruitment of the physician's first enrolled patient, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Patients' Trust in the Physician and Satisfaction With the Disclosure Experience
기간: Immediately after the truth-telling consultation
Patients' trust in the physician and satisfaction with the disclosure experience will be assessed using single-item rating scales from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater trust and satisfaction.
Immediately after the truth-telling consultation

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Shih-Ying Chen, PhD, Chang Gung University

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2025년 11월 27일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 4월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 7월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 7월 21일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 22일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 28일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 28일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 22일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

IPD 계획 설명

Individual participant data will not be shared because the dataset contains sensitive clinical and communication-related information from patients with cancer and participating physicians. De-identified aggregate results may be reported in publications.

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다