Generative AI-Based Immersive Training for Endodontic Risk Disclosure and Informed Consent Among Dental Students (GAI-ENDORDIC)
Generative AI-Based Immersive Training for Endodontic Risk Disclosure and Informed Consent Among Dental Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The objective of this prospective, parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based immersive training program, utilizing the Gemini platform, in improving endodontic risk disclosure and informed consent (RD-IC) quality, communication competence, self-efficacy, and reducing communication anxiety among undergraduate dental students during their clinical clerkship.
Traditional pedagogical methods in dental education, such as case-based learning (CBL) and peer role-playing, often struggle to simulate the high-stakes interpersonal tension and technical complexity involved in specialized endodontic risk disclosure. Complications like instrument separation, pulp floor perforation, and acute flare-ups require clear, empathetic, and legally sound communication. While standardized patients (SPs) are effective, they pose severe logistical and financial constraints for large student cohorts.
To address this gap, 96 fifth-year undergraduate dental students undergoing clinical rotation were recruited and randomly allocated to either the experimental group (1-month generative AI-based immersive training via the Gemini platform) or the control group (1-month conventional case-based learning). The AI intervention provided interactive, real-time conversational simulations across six high-stakes endodontic clinical scenarios, delivering instantaneous, personalized feedback on technical accuracy and empathetic delivery.
The primary outcome evaluated was the RD-IC completeness score. Secondary outcomes included SEGUE communication framework scores, Self-Efficacy in Clinical Communication Scale (SCS) scores, Communication Anxiety Scale (CAS) scores, blinded standardized patient (SP) ratings, user satisfaction, and long-term clinical skill retention assessed at 1-month (T2-1m) and 2-month (T2-2m) post-intervention follow-ups.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE:
Endodontic treatments-including root canal therapy, retreatment, and periradicular surgery-are technically demanding procedures that carry inherent risks of irreversible complications, such as instrument separation, canal ledging, pulp floor perforation, and acute flare-ups. Effective risk disclosure and informed consent (RD-IC) processes are essential ethical and legal safeguards that ensure patient autonomy, foster collaborative doctor-patient trust, and minimize medicolegal hazards. However, traditional dental education relying on passive lectures or case-based learning (CBL) fails to recreate the real-world psychological pressure and conversational fluidity needed during challenging consultations. Generative AI large language models (LLMs), such as Gemini, offer an innovative, highly scalable "safe-to-fail" platform capable of simulating adaptive patient personas with diverse emotional profiles and health literacy levels.
STUDY DESIGN AND PARTICIPANT RECRUITMENT:
This prospective, parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, from March to May 2026. The trial protocol strictly adhered to the CONSORT 2010 statement and CONSORT-EHEALTH 2023 extension guidelines, with ethical approval granted by the Institutional Review Board (Ethics File No. MR-43-26-046512).
A total of 96 eligible fifth-year undergraduate dental students in their clinical clerkship who had completed core endodontic didactic courses were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned via a computer-generated random sequence to either:
- Experimental Group (n=48): Generative AI-based Immersive Training.
- Control Group (n=48): Conventional Case-Based Learning (CBL).
EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS:
- Experimental Group: Participants completed a 1-month simulation program using the Gemini platform. The curriculum comprised six standardized, high-stakes endodontic clinical scenarios (including acute pain management, instrument separation disclosure, and pulp floor perforation). Students engaged in 10-15 minute adaptive dialogue sessions every 3-4 days. The platform utilized standardized prompt templates to deliver real-time, objective feedback on both technical completeness (risk disclosure) and humanistic communication (empathy, tone, and clarity).
- Control Group: Participants underwent conventional CBL targeting the exact same six endodontic scenarios over the same 1-month duration. Learning involved structured group case discussions, faculty lectures, and standard informed consent document reviews. Both groups had equal access to standard clinical guidelines.
OUTCOME MEASURES AND DATA COLLECTION:
Assessments were conducted at four distinct time points: Baseline (T0), Immediately Post-Intervention (T1), 1-Month Follow-Up (T2-1m), and 2-Month Follow-Up (T2-2m).
- Primary Outcome: RD-IC Completeness Score, measured via a validated 10-item checklist covering core indications, intraoperative complications, post-op pain, prognosis, alternative plans, and compliance.
Secondary Outcomes:
- SEGUE Framework Scores: Assessing systematic communication competence (Set the stage, Elicit info, Give info, Understand perspective, End encounter).
- Communication Self-Efficacy Scale (SCS) Scores: Evaluating confidence across clinical communication domains.
- Communication Anxiety Scale (CAS) Scores: Assessing psychological tension and situational anxiety.
- Blinded Standardized Patient (SP) Global Ratings: External validation of clinical communication performance.
- Training Satisfaction Questionnaire: Evaluating platform authenticity, feedback quality, and user experience.
- Longitudinal Retention: Skill retention and clinical transferability evaluated at T2-1m and T2-2m.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 following Intention-To-Treat (ITT) and Per-Protocol (PP) principles. Group differences were evaluated using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA, with Bonferroni corrections applied for multiple comparisons.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Hunan
-
Changsha, Hunan, 중국, 410007
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fifth-year undergraduate dental students undergoing clinical clerkship at the Department of Stomatology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine.
- Completed all core didactic and theoretical courses in endodontics.
- Entered the early stage of clinical rotation.
- Provided signed voluntary informed consent to participate in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior experience with specialized clinical communication simulation or specialized AI communication training.
- Presence of unavoidable schedule conflicts during the study period.
- Factors affecting student eligibility to complete the full training and evaluation process.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Experimental Group
Participants received a 1-month generative AI-based immersive training program using the Gemini platform, engaging in standardized interactive simulations of six high-stakes endodontic clinical scenarios with immediate personalized feedback.
|
1-month generative AI-based immersive training program utilizing the Gemini platform.
Participants engage in 10-15 minute adaptive conversational simulations every 3-4 days covering six high-stakes endodontic clinical scenarios (such as acute pain management, instrument separation disclosure, and pulp floor perforation), receiving immediate personalized feedback on risk disclosure completeness and empathetic communication.
|
|
활성 비교기: Control Group
Participants underwent conventional case-based learning (CBL) targeting the same six endodontic scenarios over 1 month, involving group case discussions, faculty lectures, and standard informed consent reviews.
|
1-month conventional case-based learning curriculum targeting the exact same six high-stakes endodontic clinical scenarios.
Learning involves structured case discussions, faculty-led lectures, and review of standardized informed consent templates without adaptive conversational immersion or real-time AI feedback.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Endodontic Risk Disclosure and Informed Consent (RD-IC) Completeness Score
기간: Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
Evaluated via a validated 10-item checklist covering core indications, intraoperative complications, postoperative pain, long-term structural defects, poor prognosis, anatomical variations, sequential treatments, anesthetic allergies, systemic diseases, and poor compliance.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating superior technical accuracy and completeness in risk disclosure.
|
Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
SEGUE Framework Doctor-Patient Communication Competence Score
기간: Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
Evaluated using the SEGUE framework checklist, assessing 5 communication domains: Set the Stage, Elicit Information, Give Information, Understand Patient Perspective, and End the Encounter.
Total median scores range from 0 to 25, with higher scores reflecting superior systematic doctor-patient interaction skills.
|
Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
|
Clinical Communication Self-Efficacy Scale (SCS) Score
기간: Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
Measures students' confidence across 4 domains: Information Gathering, Clinical Information Delivery, Emotional Empathy, and Conflict Management/Closing.
Scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
|
Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
|
Communication Anxiety Scale (CAS) Score
기간: Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
Evaluates clinical communication anxiety across 4 sub-domains: Situational Tension and Physical Anxiety, Professional Self-Doubt and Worry, Endodontic Risk Disclosure Anxiety, and Communication Burden and Avoidance Tendency.
Scores range from 12 to 60, with lower scores indicating reduced clinical communication anxiety.
|
Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
|
Blinded Standardized Patient (SP) Core Clinical Communication Competence Score
기간: Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
External assessment rated by blinded standardized patients across 5 core clinical domains: Reception Etiquette, Standardized Inquiry, Risk Informed Consent Communication, Emotional Empathy, and Closed-loop Guidance.
Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better clinical communicative performance.
|
Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
|
AI Simulation Teaching Experience Scale Score
기간: Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
Assesses student satisfaction with the educational intervention across 5 sub-scales: Platform Operation, Simulation Scene Authenticity, AI Real-time Feedback Quality, Perceived Ability Improvement, and Recognition of New Teaching Mode.
Total scores range from 20 to 100, evaluated against a theoretical neutral midpoint of 50.
|
Immediately post-intervention (T1, at 1 month after study baseline)
|
|
Long-term Retention Score of Endodontic Risk Disclosure (1-Month Follow-Up)
기간: 1-month post-intervention follow-up (T2-1m, at 2 months after study baseline)
|
Evaluates retention of communication skills 1 month post-intervention (T2-1m) across 5 sub-items: Basic Disease Communication, Intraoperative Risk Disclosure, Postoperative Risk Communication, Empathetic Alternative Plan Communication, and Closed-loop Consent Procedure.
Total scores range from 0 to 100.
|
1-month post-intervention follow-up (T2-1m, at 2 months after study baseline)
|
|
Long-term Retention Score of Endodontic Risk Disclosure (2-Month Follow-Up)
기간: 2-month post-intervention follow-up (T2-2m, at 3 months after study baseline)
|
Evaluates long-term durability and resistance to skill decay 2 months post-intervention (T2-2m) across the same 5 risk disclosure sub-items.
Total scores range from 0 to 100.
|
2-month post-intervention follow-up (T2-2m, at 3 months after study baseline)
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- MR-43-26-046512
- 2023-JG048 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: Teaching Reform Research Project of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine)
- 2026-JG060 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: 2026 Hunan Provincial Teaching Reform Research Project for General Higher Education)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
IPD 공유 기간
IPD 공유 액세스 기준
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
- 수액
- ICF
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .