Development of a Frailty Risk Prediction Model and Preliminary Evaluation of a Risk-stratified Social Robot-assisted Intervention in Middle-aged and Older Spousal Caregivers
Background With population ageing accelerating worldwide, long-term care needs are rising, and family caregivers have become an essential yet often under-recognised component of care systems. Older family caregivers are particularly susceptible to frailty because they shoulder substantial caregiving responsibilities while simultaneously experiencing their own age-related decline in health and physiological reserve. Frailty is a clinically important state of heightened vulnerability to stressors and is associated with serious adverse outcomes, including disability, hospitalisation, and mortality. In family caregivers, frailty may compromise not only health and quality of life, but also their capacity to sustain caregiving, with wider implications for the sustainability of family-based long-term care.
Research gaps A scoping review conducted by this team indicated that middle-aged and older family caregivers, particularly spousal caregivers, are vulnerable to frailty, with caregiving-related, sociodemographic, physical, psychological, and social factors contributing to this condition. However, existing evidence remains fragmented. Caregiver-specific prognostic tools for estimating future frailty risk are lacking, and risk-stratified interventions among family caregivers are sparse.
Aim This study aims to develop and validate an incident frailty risk prediction model for middle-aged and older spousal caregivers, identify modifiable risk factors, as well as develop and preliminarily evaluate a risk-stratified, social robot-assisted intervention to reduce the risk of frailty.
Methods This study comprises four phases. Phase 1 is a completed scoping review that mapped evidence on frailty among middle-aged and older family caregivers. Phase 2 will use longitudinal data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to develop and validate an incident frailty risk prediction model for middle-aged and older spousal caregivers and to construct an online risk calculator. Phase 3 will develop social robot-assisted intervention based on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model. Phase 4 will assess the feasibility, acceptability, and examine preliminary effects of the intervention.
Expected outcomes This study is expected to provide a caregiver-specific tool for early frailty risk identification and risk stratification among middle-aged and older spousal caregivers. It will also generate a theoretically guided, risk-stratified social robot-assisted intervention targeting modifiable risk factors for frailty and provide evidence on its feasibility and acceptability, as well as preliminary effects. The findings will inform a future definitive large-scale trial and community-based caregiver support services.
연구 개요
상태
정황
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Ivy Yan Zhao
- 전화번호: +8527664550
- 이메일: yan-ivy.zhao@polyu.edu.hk
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged 50 years or older
- currently being a spouse caregiver
- assessed as being at high risk level frailty by the developed online risk calculator
- being able to use the social robot through a smartphone or tablet, either independently or with necessary guidance
- willing to sign informed consent and participate in study
Exclusion Criteria:
- those with acute mental disorders or disabling diseases that may limit the practice of engaging with a robot
- acute disease attack or acute medical condition
- currently participating in another intervention or clinical trial
- who have limited access to electricity, which would make it hard for them to use technology at home
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 지지 요법
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: social robot-assisted intervention
A social robot-assisted intervention wii be provided to participants.
Participants will be encouraged to engage with the virtual social robot 3 times per week, with each structured session lasting approximately 20 minutes, over a 6-week intervention period.
|
A virtual social robot-assisted intervention will be provided to participants.
Participants will be encouraged to engage with the virtual social robot 3 times per week, with each structured session lasting approximately 20 minutes, over a 6-week intervention period.
|
|
위약 비교기: Wait-list control group
Participants allocated to the wait-list control group will receive delayed access to the virtual social robot intervention after completion of the final follow-up assessment.
|
Participants allocated to the wait-list control group will receive delayed access to the virtual social robot intervention after completion of the final follow-up assessment.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Robot-use adherence rate
기간: Throughout the 6-week intervention period
|
Robot-use adherence will be assessed using automatically recorded robot usage logs.
Adherence will be calculated for each participant as the number of prescribed robot-use sessions completed divided by the total number of robot-use sessions prescribed during the 6-week intervention period, multiplied by 100.
Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence to the prescribed robot-use schedule.
|
Throughout the 6-week intervention period
|
|
Robot-use frequency
기간: Throughout the 6-week intervention period
|
Robot-use frequency will be assessed using automatically recorded robot usage logs.
A robot-use session will be defined as one recorded episode of interaction with the robot.
The number of robot-use sessions completed by each participant will be summarized as the mean number of sessions per week across the 6-week intervention period.
A higher number indicates more frequent robot use.
|
Throughout the 6-week intervention period
|
|
Participant retention rate
기간: Week 6
|
The participant retention rate will be calculated as the number of enrolled participants who remain in the study and have not withdrawn by Week 6 divided by the total number of participants enrolled, multiplied by 100.
Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater participant retention.
|
Week 6
|
|
The follow-up assessment completion rate
기간: Week 6
|
The follow-up assessment completion rate will be calculated as the number of participants who complete the scheduled Week 6 follow-up assessment divided by the total number of enrolled participants expected to complete the assessment, multiplied by 100.
Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater follow-up completion.
|
Week 6
|
|
Acceptability of the robot-based intervention assessed by semi-structured interviews
기간: Week 6, following completion of the intervention
|
All participants in the intervention group will be invited to participate in an individual semi-structured interview at Week 6. Interviews will explore participants' experiences of using the robot at home and their perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention.
Interview data will be analyzed using thematic analysis and reported as themes and subthemes related to participants' experiences and perceived acceptability.
No numerical scale score will be calculated.
|
Week 6, following completion of the intervention
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Adapted 6-item Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) Self-Evaluation Questionnaire
기간: Baseline and Week 6
|
Capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage in frailty risk-management behaviours will be assessed using the Adapted 6-item Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour Self-Evaluation Questionnaire (Keyworth et al., 2020).
The questionnaire contains six items assessing physical capability, psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, reflective motivation, and automatic motivation.
Each item is rated from 0 to 10. Item scores will be summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater overall perceived capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage in frailty risk-management behaviours.
|
Baseline and Week 6
|
|
Fried's frailty phenotype
기간: Baseline and Week 6
|
Frailty will be assessed using Fried's frailty phenotype, which includes five criteria: slowness, weakness, unintentional weight loss, low physical activity, and exhaustion.
One point will be assigned for each criterion present, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Participants will be classified as non-frail if no criteria are present, pre-frail if one or two criteria are present, and frail if three or more criteria are present.
Higher scores indicate a greater level of frailty.
|
Baseline and Week 6
|
|
Frailty Risk Probability
기간: Baseline and Week 6
|
Individual frailty risk probability will be estimated using the online frailty calculator developed by our team.
|
Baseline and Week 6
|
|
Modifiable Frailty Risk-Factor Indicator
기간: Baseline and Week 6
|
Based on the modifiable risk factors identified in phase 3, indicators may include physical activity, sleep quality, nutritional status, depression, social support, and caregiver intensity.
Appropriate validated scales will be used for modifiable risk factor.
|
Baseline and Week 6
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- S001856
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .