- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07805395
Building Capacity for Youth Mental Wellness: Family Navigator Model for Foster Parents (FN+)
2026년 9월 3일 업데이트: Heather Risser, Northwestern University
Building Capacity for Youth Mental Wellness: Feasibility and Acceptability for a Mental Health Family Navigator Model for Foster Parents (FN+ Phase 2)
The investigators have designed a 5-week Family Navigator Plus (FN+) educational program to support foster parents in better understanding their youth's mental health needs and in finding mental health services.
The purpose of this interventional study is to assess the the program's acceptability (e.g., satisfaction, barriers to participation, and burden), utility (e.g., how useful foster parents found the program to be), and feasibility (e.g., number referred who meet eligibility, time to complete assessments, self-reported feasibility), compared to Attention Control (AC).
The investigators hypothesize that our program will be acceptable, useful, and feasible for foster parents of youth with mental health needs.
연구 개요
상태
모병
상세 설명
We will conduct a pilot RCT (n = 60) as a test of the FN+ Program feasibility and preliminary effectiveness to improve individual-level variables, relative to Attention Control (AC).
The primary outcome will be increased foster parent activation (P-PAM-MH).
Secondary outcomes include reduced barriers to treatment and perceived change in parent capacity to manage youth MH care.
Randomization: We will use simple randomization to assign foster parents to condition.
Foster parents (n=60) will be randomized to the either the FN+ or AC.
We will pilot all randomization procedures including those designed to prevent allocation bias.
Randomization will be conducted by a research analyst who is blind to hypotheses and is not involved in any other aspect of the study.
The research analyst will only share the names and condition assignment with the FNs who do not know study aims or hypotheses and will keep research staff blinded to condition.
The ACHW will conduct all outcome data and remain blind to condition.
The ACHW will remain masked to treatment assignment until the trial is complete.
Success in masking will be monitored using the Evaluator Masking Assessment upon the completion of each data collection time point for each parent.
Inclusion and Exclusion criteria are the same as Aim 2 with the addition that any foster parent that participated in Aim 1 or 2 will be excluded from the RCT.
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (추정된)
60
단계
- 2 단계
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 연락처
- 이름: Heather Risser, PhD
- 전화번호: 3128483019
- 이메일: heather.risser@northwestern.edu
연구 연락처 백업
- 이름: Christina Boisseau, PhD
- 전화번호: 312-5033270
- 이메일: christina.boisseau@northwestern.edu
연구 장소
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, 미국, 60611
- 모병
- Northwestern University
-
수석 연구원:
- Heather J Risser, PhD
-
연락하다:
-
수석 연구원:
- Christina Boisseau, PhD
-
연락하다:
- Heather Risser, PhD
- 전화번호: 312-848-3019
- 이메일: heather.risser@northwestern.edu
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
예
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Foster parent, kinship caregiver, or guardian, of a youth between the ages of 6 to 17 with mental health needs
- Parent adopted child from foster care
- Living in Illinois, United States
- English speaking
- Has access to internet and videoconferencing
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participated in the FN+ Focus Groups, Open Trial or PROACTIVE Parent Pilot Study
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Family Navigator Plus
Participants will attend 5 one-on-one sessions over the course of 5 weeks; they will meet with a family navigator over video conferencing software (e.g., Zoom).
The purpose of each sessions are as follows: 1) Provide an overview of the program and help parents understand their perceptions of child behaviors, 2) Train parents to find, access, and overcome barriers to mental health services, 3) Build parent capacity in understanding how mental health treatment works and how to communicate with providers, 4) Help parents understand the common function of child behaviors, and 5) Train parents to find, evaluate, and use online mental health tools.
Participants will complete measures of child symptoms, parent activation, barriers to treatment, and/or satisfaction with the program before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after completing the intervention.
|
Participants will attend 5 one-on-one sessions over the course of 5 weeks; they will meet with a family navigator over video conferencing software (e.g., Zoom).
The purpose of each sessions are as follows: 1) Provide an overview of the program and help parents understand their perceptions of child behaviors, 2) Train parents to find, access, and overcome barriers to mental health services, 3) Build parent capacity in understanding how mental health treatment works and how to communicate with providers, 4) Help parents understand the common function of child behaviors, and 5) Train parents to find, evaluate, and use online mental health tools.
Participants will complete measures of child symptoms, parent activation, barriers to treatment, and/or satisfaction with the program before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after completing the intervention.
|
|
활성 비교기: Civic Engagement Plus
Participants will attend 5 one-on-one sessions over the course of 5 weeks; they will meet with a family navigator over video conferencing software (e.g., Zoom).
The purpose of each sessions are as follows: 1) defines civic engagement within a developmental framework, and guides foster parents in discussing their child's developmental level, strengths, and opportunities for civic participation.
2) identifies developmentally appropriate civic activities and strategies to initiate and support youth involvement.
3) emphasizes goal setting, age-appropriate engagement strategies, collaboration with caseworkers, and structured problem-solving to address barriers to participation.
4) setting developmentally appropriate goals, 5) finding digital tools.
Participants will complete measures of child symptoms, parent activation, barriers to treatment, and/or satisfaction with the program before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after completing the intervention.
|
Participants will attend 5 one-on-one sessions over the course of 5 weeks; they will meet with a family navigator over video conferencing software (e.g., Zoom).
The purpose of each sessions are as follows: 1) defines civic engagement within a developmental framework, and guides foster parents in discussing their child's developmental level, strengths, and opportunities for civic participation.
2) identifies developmentally appropriate civic activities and strategies to initiate and support youth involvement.
3) emphasizes goal setting, age-appropriate engagement strategies, collaboration with caseworkers, and structured problem-solving to address barriers to participation.
4) setting developmentally appropriate goals, 5) finding digital tools.
Participants will complete measures of child symptoms, parent activation, barriers to treatment, and/or satisfaction with the program before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after completing the intervention.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Post Session Questionnaire
기간: Time Frame: After Completing Each Session (Weeks 1 - 5)
|
Description: The Post Session Questionnaire is a measure we created to assess utility and relevance of session content and materials, and to assess if participants intended to use skills/information learned during that session.
Response options range from 1 - 4. Higher scores mean participants found the content more useful.
|
Time Frame: After Completing Each Session (Weeks 1 - 5)
|
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
기간: Time Frame: Post-Intervention (Week 5) and 3 Month Follow Up (Week 18)
|
Description: The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is an eight-item measure that assesses client satisfaction with services including its quality, utility, and relevance.
Response options range from 1 - 4. Higher scores mean participants found to be of high quality, met their needs, etc.
|
Time Frame: Post-Intervention (Week 5) and 3 Month Follow Up (Week 18)
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Parent-Patient Activation Measure - Mental Health
기간: Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-Intervention (Week 5), 3 month Follow Up (Week 18)
|
Description: The Parent-Patient Activation Measure - Mental Health measures parent activation, defined as the knowledge, ability, and confidence to manage their child's mental health care.
It consists of 13 items on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1-4.
Item scores are summed for a total composite score ranging from 13 -52.
Composite scores are linearly transformed into scores ranging from 0 - 100.
Higher scores indicate higher activation in managing their child's mental health care.
PP-PAM-MH internal consistency is adequate, alpha = .89;
Item-measures correlations ranged from moderate to large, with a median correlation of .61.
The P-PAM-MH is positively correlated with measures of empowerment and negatively correlated with measures of strain.
|
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-Intervention (Week 5), 3 month Follow Up (Week 18)
|
|
Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale
기간: Baseline (week 1), Post-Intervention (week 5), 3 month Follow - Up (week 18)
|
Description: The Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale (BTPS; Kazdin et al., 1997), was designed to assess parent's perceptions of barriers to mental health treatment engagement for their children.
The scale consists of two sections.
The first section contains four subscales that measure the following constructs: stressors and obstacles that compete with treatment (20 items), treatment demands and issues (10 items), perceived relevance of treatment (8 items), and relationship with the therapist (6 items).
Response options for these 44 items range from 1 (Never a problem) to 5 (Very often a problem).
The second section includes 14 discrete events associated with early treatment termination.
Response options for this section include yes and no.
Higher scores on the measure indicate more barriers to treatment participation.
Scores on the BTPS have been associated with multiple indices measuring the child's participation in treatment.
Internal consistency for total score is α =.95, an
|
Baseline (week 1), Post-Intervention (week 5), 3 month Follow - Up (week 18)
|
|
PROMIS Parent Proxy Depressive Symptoms Short Form
기간: Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-intervention (week 5), 3 month follow up (week 18)
|
Description: The PROMIS Parent Proxy Depressive Symptoms Short Form 8a measures negative mood and views of self, social cognition, and decreased positive affect and engagement in pediatric populations aged 5- to 17-years old (Irwin, et al., 2012).
Parents respond to 8 items assessing their child's symptoms of depression.
Response options range from 1 (never) to 5 (almost always).
Higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
Scores are reported as T-scores ranging from 35-82, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the sample referenced (Irwin et al, 2010).
Higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
Parent proxy measures were created using Item Response Theory to support theoretically maximized reliability and validity across the trait being measured.
Parent proxy scores were strongly univocal with 89% of the general variance explained by the scale's general factor.
Internal consistency is adequate at .90.
|
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-intervention (week 5), 3 month follow up (week 18)
|
|
PROMIS Parent Proxy Anxiety Short Form
기간: Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-intervention (week 5), 3 month follow up (week 18)
|
Description: The PROMIS Parent Proxy Anxiety Short Form 8a measures symptoms of fear, anxious misery, hyperarousal, and somatic symptoms related to arousal among pediatric populations aged 5- to 17-years old (Irwin, et al., 2012).
Parents respond to 8 items assessing their child's symptoms of anxiety.
Response options range from 1 (never) to 5 (almost always).
Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Scores are reported as T-scores ranging from 32-84, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the sample referenced (Irwin et al, 2010).
Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
The measure was created using Item Response Theory to support theoretically maximized reliability and validity across the trait being measured.
The parent proxy version was validated against other proxy measures to ensure content and discriminant validity.
Parent proxy scores were strongly univocal with 87% of the general variance explained by the scale's general factor.
Internal consistenc
|
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-intervention (week 5), 3 month follow up (week 18)
|
|
Pediatric Symptom Checklist - 17
기간: Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-Intervention (Week 5), 3 month Follow Up (Week 18)
|
Description: The Pediatric Symptom Checklist - 17 (PSC-17) was designed to assess psychosocial function in children.
The measures includes three subscales that assess symptoms associated with internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems.
Response options range from 0 (Never) to 2 (Often).
The parent report version is used with children aged 5- to 17- years.
T scores range from 0-34, with at or above 15 indicating the presence of a psychosocial impairment.
Internalizing or Attention subscale scores at or above 5, and Externalizing scores at or above 7, indicate impairment.
The measure has been validated in the general child population.
Parent-reported internal consistency range from .79-.83, and overall reliability as .89.
A large-scale replication study confirmed reliability was high, with both internal consistency and test-retest reliability both at, or above, 0.85 on the parent report form.
|
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-Intervention (Week 5), 3 month Follow Up (Week 18)
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
2026년 9월 5일
기본 완료 (추정된)
2027년 9월 30일
연구 완료 (추정된)
2027년 9월 30일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2026년 9월 1일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2026년 9월 1일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2026년 9월 4일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2026년 9월 9일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2026년 9월 3일
마지막으로 확인됨
2026년 9월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- STU00225845
- 5R34MH134941 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
예
IPD 계획 설명
Per NIMH Data Sharing policy, de-identified IDP will be shared in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA, https://nda.nih.gov/)
IPD 공유 기간
Per NIMH data sharing policy
IPD 공유 액세스 기준
Per NIMH data sharing policy
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
아니
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
아니
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .