Comparative study on optical performance and visual outcomes between two diffractive multifocal lenses: AMO Tecnis ® ZMB00 and AcrySof ® IQ ReSTOR ® Multifocal IOL SN6AD1
Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves, Wilson Takashi Hida, Patrick Frenzel Tzeliks, Michelle Rodrigues Gonçalves, Fernando de Bortoli Nogueira, Celso Takashi Nakano, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta, André Gustavo Rolim de Araújo, Milton Ruiz Alves, Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves, Wilson Takashi Hida, Patrick Frenzel Tzeliks, Michelle Rodrigues Gonçalves, Fernando de Bortoli Nogueira, Celso Takashi Nakano, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta, André Gustavo Rolim de Araújo, Milton Ruiz Alves
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the optical performance and visual outcomes between two diffractive multifocal lenses: AMO Tecnis® ZMB00 and AcrySof® ReSTOR® SN6AD1.
Methods: This prospective, non-randomized comparative study included the assessment of 74 eyes in 37 patients referred for cataract surgery and candidates for multifocal intraocular lens implants. Exclusion criteria included existence of any other eye disease, previous eye surgery, high axial myopia, preoperative corneal astigmatism of >1.00 cylindrical diopter (D), and intraoperative or postoperative complications. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), with analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS), wavefront, and visual defocus curve.
Results: Postoperative UDVA was 0.09 and 0.08 logMAR in the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, respectively (p=0.868); postoperative CDVA was 0.04 and 0.02 logMAR in the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, respectively (p=0.68); DCIVA was 0.17 and 0.54 logMAR in the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, respectively (p=0.000); and DCNVA was 0.04 and 0.09 logMAR in the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, respectively (p=0.001). In both cases, there was an improvement in the spherical equivalent and UDVA (p<0.05). Under photopic conditions, the SN6AD1 group had better CS at low frequencies without glare (p=0.04); however, the ZMB00 group achieved better sensitivity at high frequencies with glare (p=0.003). The SN6AD1 and ZMB00 lenses exhibited similar behavior for intermediate vision, according to the defocus curve; however, the ZMB00 group showed a shorter reading distance than the SN6AD1 group. There were no significant differences regarding aberrometry between the two groups.
Conclusion: Both lenses promoted better quality of vision for both long and short distances and exhibited a similar behavior for intermediate vision. The SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups showed better results for CS under photopic conditions at low and high spatial frequencies, respectively.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01763411.
Source: PubMed
다가오는 임상 시험
-
Magnus MedicalCongressionally Directed Medical Research Programs모병
-
Nicholas ButowskiSiren Biotechnology아직 모집하지 않음신경교종 | 뇌종양 | 재발성 고등급 신경교종미국
-
State University of New York at Buffalo아직 모집하지 않음
-
Poitiers University Hospital아직 모집하지 않음
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris아직 모집하지 않음
-
University of California, Irvine모병뇌암 | CNS 암 | 신경계 암 | 뇌전이암미국
-
Guangdong Raynovent Biotech Co., Ltd아직 모집하지 않음
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityWu Jieh Yee Charitable Foundation모병
-
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...아직 모집하지 않음
-
Sun Yat-sen University아직 모집하지 않음금연 | AI 에이전트 | Early-Stage Cancer
-
Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University아직 모집하지 않음