此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Improving Functional Health Literacy in Older Veterans

2009年1月20日 更新者:US Department of Veterans Affairs
The objective of this two parallel component study is to develop interventions for the visual and cognitive related health literacy disabilities of older veterans. The first component will test two interventions for improving functional health literacy performance (enhancing the design of health literacy materials and training reading skills) by using a 2 x 2 between subjects factorial design. The second component consists of patient, family, and provider focus groups who will help determine where to apply and disseminate the interventions by identifying problematic sources of text-based health materials. Finally, as a result of both components improved health information design guidelines and training protocols will be developed as rehabilitative interventions for health literacy disability.

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

Objective of this two parallel component study is to develop interventions for the visual and cognitive related health literacy disabilities of older veterans. The first component will test two interventions for improving functional health literacy performance (enhancing the design of health literacy materials and training reading skills) by using a 2 x 2 between subjects factorial design. The second component consists of patient, family, and provider focus groups who will help determine where to apply and disseminate the interventions by identifying problematic sources of text-based health materials. Finally, as a result of both components, improved health information design guidelines and training protocols will be developed as rehabilitative interventions for health literacy disability.

Specific research questions are:

  1. Can the lower functional health literacy performance of veterans be improved by following text design directives intended to account for age-related visual and cognitive changes (enhanced version)?
  2. Does instruction in skills and strategies for reading yield improvements in functional health literacy performance?
  3. Does instruction in reading skills and enhanced text design improve functional health literacy to a greater extent than either intervention alone?
  4. Are reading gains maintained over time?
  5. What everyday sources of functional health literature are problematic for today's veterans?
  6. How do visual, cognitive, and descriptive factors contribute to change in functional health literacy score?
  7. What is the functional health literacy of older veterans who utilize Atlanta VA health care?

Focus Groups: Three two-hour focus groups will be composed of 15 VA health professionals, 15 outpatient veterans aged 65 and older with low functional health literacy, and 15 family members of veterans with low functional health literacy. These focus groups will identify sources of text-based health information which they find to be problematic from their respective perspectives. These sources, as well as recommendations for the application and dissemination of guidelines and directives for improved health information designs and training protocols, will be compiled using transcription and analysis of focus group sessions.

Interventions: Community dwelling veterans aged 65 and older will be recruited from the Geriatric Primary Care Clinic and the Veteran's Learning Center. Ethnicity, education, health status, general literacy, and other descriptive information will be recorded. Visual baseline measures will include assessments of visual skills for reading and visual function. Cognitive baseline measures will include assessments of word recognition, text comprehension ability, verbal working memory, perceptual speed and vocabulary level. Functional health literacy, measured by the TOFHLA, will be the main outcome measure. This objective and standardized instrument measures the ability of adults to read and understand medical instructional and health care information presented in prose passages and passages containing numerical information. Two hundred and forty participants demonstrating inadequate functional health literacy scores (by the screening instrument STOFHLA) will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: control (N=60), enhanced only (N=60), reading skills and strategies instruction only (N=60), or enhanced with reading skills and strategies instruction (N=60). All participants will receive vision and cognition testing and will then participate in two 2-hour sessions. Depending on group assignment participants will either 1) read standard health-related material (control) 2) read enhanced health-related material (enhanced) 3) receive reading skills training (training) 4) receive reading skills training with enhanced materials (training and enhanced).

研究类型

介入性

注册 (预期的)

240

阶段

  • 阶段2

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Georgia
      • Decatur、Georgia、美国
        • VA Medical Center

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

65年 及以上 (年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Older Veterans

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:阶乘赋值
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • David Wolff, Ph.D. Special Assistant to the Director、Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service
  • Vicki Mongiardo, Program Analyst、Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2001年4月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2004年5月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2002年5月30日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2002年5月30日

首次发布 (估计)

2002年5月31日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2009年1月21日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2009年1月20日

最后验证

2002年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • E2569R

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅