此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Appropriateness of Frozen Plasma Use in Canada

2012年5月22日 更新者:Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
There is little evidence to guide the current use of Frozen Plasma. Despite this, over 260,000 units of frozen plasma are transfused in Canada annually. Based on the limited published data available, the pattern of practice for Frozen Plasma transfusions is highly variable and an important number of Frozen Plasma transfusions appear to be inappropriate. Given inappropriate use, it is inevitable that a percentage of patients experience unnecessary and potentially life-threatening adverse transfusion reactions. Current guidelines for Frozen Plasma offer little help in guiding specific clinical decisions as their recommendations lack sufficient clinical details. This lack of detail also hinders the utility of these guidelines to help monitor and improve clinical practice. Further research examining Frozen Plasma transfusions including an understanding our current use is critical to improve the utilization of this valuable and limited resource.

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

Objectives: We will (1) systematically review the evidence for the use of Frozen Plasma transfusions, (2) establish appropriateness ratings for all clinical scenarios for which Frozen Plasma is transfused, and (3) perform a 3-month prospective study to understand the current use and the appropriateness of use of Frozen Plasma in 12 Canadian academic centres.

Methods and Analysis: Following a well established methodology to evaluate medical therapies developed at RAND/UCLA, the investigators will purposively employ different epidemiologic techniques to assess the current use and appropriateness of Frozen Plasma transfusions in Canada.

First, we will undertake a thorough systematic review of the evidence for the use of Frozen Plasma across all indications.

The RAND modified Delphi methodology will then be used to determine the appropriateness of transfusing Frozen Plasma across a comprehensive set of clinical scenarios. A panel of 9 experts representing relevant clinical specialties will use the evidence from the systematic review to determine the appropriateness ratings (an ordinal scale of 1-9) for each clinical scenario.

Subsequently, we will undertake a prospective cohort study of all episodes of Frozen Plasma transfusions (approximately 5000 episodes) at 10 Canadian academic centres (17 hospitals) using the appropriateness ratings. Trained research assistants will identify all transfusion episodes via the blood bank and perform a chart review to obtain demographic variables (age, sex, weight), clinical variables (diagnosis, coagulopathy, indications for frozen plasma transfusions, other blood product transfusions), and laboratory (pre and posttransfusion coagulation tests) information. These data will allow mapping of each transfusion event onto a specific clinical scenario rated by the expert panel and the assignment of an appropriateness rating. We will also determine the total number of patients and the number of patients for each of the largest user groups of Frozen Plasma at each hospital. The primary outcomes for the prospective cohort study, the proportion of inappropriate transfusions (appropriateness) and the proportion of patients transfused (overall utilization), will be initially examined using descriptive statistics. Using hierarchical modeling, a logistic regression analysis will be used to examine the proportion of inappropriate transfusions while controlling for indication, hospital, and patient factors. For the analysis of overall utilization of Frozen Plasma, a chi-square analysis will be used to compare the proportion of patients transfused in the largest user groups at the different hospitals. A secondary analysis will examine the dose of Frozen Plasma transfused.

Generated Research: From the systematic reviews, appropriateness ratings, and the results of the cohort study, we will have summarized the evidence supporting the use of Frozen Plasma, produced detailed clinical guidelines outlining the appropriate and inappropriate indications for Frozen Plasma and provided an understanding of the variation in use and appropriateness of Frozen Plasma. Each of these elements can then be used by hospitals in Canada and elsewhere to improve the current use of Frozen Plasma. Understanding of the variation in Frozen Plasma will allow for a framework to improve transfusion practice and identify those areas of Frozen Plasma use that merit the greatest attention for further research.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

2580

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

16年 及以上 (孩子、成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Patients at 10 academic medical centres (17 hospitals) across Canada

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects receiving frozen plasma or PCC transfusions

Exclusion Criteria:

No subjects excluded -

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
The primary outcome for the appropriateness of Frozen Plasma transfusions will be the proportion of appropriate transfusion episodes.
大体时间:2 months
Each transfusion episode will be the unit of analysis as a single patient may receive both inappropriate and appropriate transfusions.
2 months

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
The number of units transfused per patient will be the secondary outcome.
大体时间:2 months
The investigators consider whether or not a patient received either Frozen Plasma or a prothrombin complex concentrate as the most clinically important outcome. The investigators will also collect data on the total number of patients in hospital for the study period. This outcome is also important as differences in transfusion dose will have an important impact on the cost of Frozen Plasma and prothrombin complex concentrate transfusions and will not be captured in an analysis looking solely at the proportion of patients transfused
2 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Alan T Tinmouth, MD, MSc、Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2008年5月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2011年3月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2011年3月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2010年8月20日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2010年8月20日

首次发布 (估计)

2010年8月23日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2012年5月23日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2012年5月22日

最后验证

2012年5月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅