此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

RESULT (REflux Surgery in Lung Transplantation) Preliminary Study Protocol (RESULT)

2014年9月10日 更新者:Duke University

Prospective and Retrospective Study to Develop a Multi-center Randomized Study, to Determine if Prevention of GERD Related Aspiration by Surgical Fundoplication Improves Lung Allograft Function

The purpose of the prospective study is to collect information surrounding lung transplant in order to develop a randomized study to determine if prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) related aspiration (stomach acid coming up from the stomach into the esophagus) by surgical fundoplication improves lung rejection. Lung transplantation has evolved into an effective treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease; however, a significant limitation to long-term survival is patients develop a condition of scarring known as chronic lung rejection, which can cause lung function to deteriorate, thereby reducing a patient's chances for survival. Preliminary research has shown a correlation between the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and impaired early lung rejection as assessed by a breathing test, FEV1 (the amount of forced expired air volume in 1 second).

The Investigator is interested in learning more about this condition and the potential for aspiration (inhaling fluid) injury. The primary goal of this preliminary study will be to identify aspiration markers that are correlated with adverse clinical outcomes (increased early rejection, decreased FEV1) that may be used as inclusion criteria for the future randomized trial.

The purpose of the retrospective study is to collect information surrounding lung transplant in order to develop a randomized study to determine if prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) related aspiration (stomach acid coming up from the stomach into the esophagus) by surgical fundoplication improves lung rejection.

The goal of this retrospective data collection is to review the following:

  1. subject outcome event rates for subjects with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) for survival, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS), acute rejection and Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV-1),
  2. the estimated treatment effect of fundoplication on the above event rates,
  3. a threshold effect for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) and/or death are more likely to occur at higher or more proximal acid or non-acid contact times.

This data will be collected in order to better design and coordinate a multicenter prospective study.

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

Prospective Group: Approximately 125 Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) samples will be collected from eligible subjects at the time of clinical bronchoscopies and will be within 2 weeks of their esophageal study. The Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) samples will be assayed for bile acids; pepsin, pepsinogen I and II; trypsin; gastrin, and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) content. Short-term clinical outcome measures including acute rejection episodes, and Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV-1) at one year will be collected. Correlation between markers of reflux and aspiration will be analyzed.

Retrospective Group: Up to 800 charts within the past 5 years will be reviewed for 1) subject outcome event rates for subjects with and without Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) for survival, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS), acute rejection and Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV-1), 2) what is the estimated treatment effect of fundoplication on the above event rates, 3) is there a threshold effect such that events such as BOS and death are more likely to occur only at higher or more proximal acid or non-acid contact times. This review will better address the role of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) in lung allograft failure, the clinical utility of surgical fundoplication in preventing lung allograft injury, and the role that acid and non-acid reflux as related to aspiration causes lung allograft injury as it relates to a wider population.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

647

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Ontario
      • Toronto、Ontario、加拿大、M5G2C4
        • University of Toronto
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore、Maryland、美国、21287
        • Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Durham、North Carolina、美国、27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland、Ohio、美国、44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

16年 及以上 (孩子、成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Male or non-pregnant female subject ≥16 years of age with a double-lung transplant who have undergone a 24-hour esophageal pH and/orimpedance probe study within 12 months prior to transplant and/or within 12 months following transplantation.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or non-pregnant female subject
  2. 16 years of age
  3. Recipient of a double-lung transplant
  4. Previously have a 24-hour esophageal pH and/or impedance probe study within 12 months prior to transplant and/or within 12 months following transplantation. If the subject expired prior to 12 months from transplant date, they must have had a 24-hour esophageal pH and/or impedance probe study to be eligible in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recipient of a single-lung transplant
  2. Recipient of a re-do lung transplant
  3. Recipient of a double-lung/heart or double-lung/ other organ transplant
  4. Do not have a 24-hour esophageal pH and/or impedance probe study within 12 months pre-transplant or within 12 months following transplantation. The subject expired less than 12 months post transplant without having a 24-hour esophageal pH and/or impedance probe study
  5. No Spirometry data is available for the subject
  6. Subject who is participating in any other interventional clinical study
  7. Unable to provide written informed consent or participate in long-term follow-up

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
Prospective Group
Those patients that will be consented and data collected prospectively
Retrospective Group
Those charts that will be utilized to collect retrospective data, waiver of consent will be granted by the IRBs.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
BAL aspiration markers
大体时间:1 year
For the prospective study analysis, we will be assessing the relationship of gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration post lung transplantation with the occurrence of lung allograft dysfunction by reviewing BAL samples prospectively collected in approximately 125 subjects. These BAL samples will be assayed for bile acids; pepsin, pepsinogen I and II; trypsin; gastrin, and LPS content. The correlation of the aspiration biomarkers to acute rejection, BOS, death and FEV-1 at one year will be assessed.
1 year
Death
大体时间:1 year
For the retrospective study, the first specific goal of data collection is outcome event rates for subjects with and without GERD for survival and the estimated treatment effect of fundoplication on the above event rates. A threshold effect for death is more likely to occur at higher or more proximal acid or non-acid contact times. Up to 5 years of follow-up data will be available for analysis with the primary comparison at one year. These data will be used to better design and coordinate a multicenter prospective study.
1 year
BOS
大体时间:1 year
For the retrospective study, the second specific goal of data collection is event rates for subjects with and without GERD for BOS and the estimated treatment effect of fundoplication on the above event rates. A threshold effect for BOS is more likely to occur at higher or more proximal acid or non-acid contact times. Up to 5 years of follow-up data will be available for analysis with the primary comparison at one year. These data will be used to better design and coordinate a multicenter prospective study.
1 year
FEV-1
大体时间:1 year
For the retrospective study, the third goal of data collection is evaluation of FEV-1 changes for subjects with and without GERD and the estimated treatment effect of fundoplication. Up to 5 years of follow-up data will be available for analysis with the primary comparison at one year. Data will be used to design a multicenter prospective study, address the role of GERD in lung allograft failure, the clinical utility of surgical fundoplication in preventing lung allograft injury, and the role that acid and non-acid reflux as related to aspiration causes lung allograft injury.
1 year
Acute Rejection
大体时间:1 year
For the retrospective study, the final goal of data collection is evaluation of acute rejection episodes for subjects with and without GERD and the estimated treatment effect of fundoplication. Up to 5 years of follow-up data will be available for analysis with the primary comparison at one year. Data will be used to design a multicenter prospective study and to address the role of GERD in lung allograft failure, the clinical utility of surgical fundoplication in preventing lung allograft injury, and the role that acid and non-acid reflux as related to aspiration causes lung allograft injury.
1 year

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Robert D. Davis, MD、Duke University

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2011年9月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2013年6月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2013年8月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2011年6月28日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2011年7月29日

首次发布 (估计)

2011年8月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2014年9月12日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2014年9月10日

最后验证

2014年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • Pro00025618
  • 1R34HL105422-01 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅