Pilot Study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Bipolar I Disorder
2017年5月10日 更新者：Andrew A. Nierenberg, MD、Massachusetts General Hospital
Transdiagnostic Treatment for Anxiety and Bipolar I Disorder
The specific goal of this research study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a transdiagnostic, cognitive-behavioral therapy developed specifically to target common core processes across mood and anxiety disorders [Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP)], for the treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and comorbid anxiety.
The study will compare treatment-as-usual with pharmacotherapy (TAU) plus 18 one-hour sessions of treatment with the UP to TAU alone.
Patients in both treatment conditions will be followed over a 12-month period and will be assessed monthly to track changes in mood, anxiety and emotion-related symptoms; functional impairment; and relapse rates.
Data on the acceptability of the treatment will be gathered concurrently through monthly patient self-reported ratings of treatment satisfaction, and by tracking rates of acceptance for randomization into the study, number of completed sessions, and dropout rates.
The study will examine: 1) whether combined cognitive behavioral treatment (UP) for BD-I and comorbid anxiety disorders is an acceptable and feasible approach to treatment; 2) whether treatment with the UP for BD-I and comorbid anxiety disorders as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy treatment-as-usual (TAU) leads to greater symptom reduction and reduced functional impairment than pharmacotherapy alone, 3) whether treatment for BD-I and comorbid anxiety disorders with the UP improves relapse rates over a 6-month follow-up relative to TAU; and 4) whether reduction in symptoms, relapse rates, and functional impairment are mediated by changes in emotion regulation skills.
The broader aim of this study is to address the need for improved treatments for bipolar disorder.
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
34
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital Bipolar Clinic and Research Program
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 至 65年 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women age 18-65
- DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I disorder and at least one of three additional anxiety disorders:
generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or social phobia.
- HAM-D-17 score <16 (i.e. depressive symptoms)
- YMRS score < 12 (i.e. no or very low manic symptoms)
- Current, stabilized (> 3 months) pharmacotherapy treatment under the care of a psychiatrist consisting of optimized, stable maintenance pharmacotherapy at maximum tolerated dosages according to Texas Implementation of Medication Algorithm.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active suicidality (HAM-D-17 suicide item #3 score > 3) in the past 2 months. Potential participants scoring 3 or higher on the HAM-D-17 suicide item will be immediately evaluated by the PI and Sponsor and referred to a higher level of care if clinically indicated.
- DSM-IV bipolar I disorder subtype rapid cycling
- DSM-IV manic or mixed episode in the past 2 months
- DSM-IV major depressive episode in the past 2 months
- Psychotropic medication not in accordance with the revised Texas Implementation of Medication Algorithm
- Current Pregnancy
- Medical illness or non-psychiatric medical treatment that would likely interfere with study participation.
- Neurologic disorder, previous ECT, or history of head trauma (i.e. known structural brain lesion)
- Current or past history of selected DSM-IV Axis I disorders other than bipolar disorder including: organic mental disorder, substance abuse within the past 12 months and/or history of substance abuse for > 1 year; current substance dependence (including alcohol), as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR, Substance Use Disorders (Section E); schizophrenia, delusional disorder, psychotic disorders not otherwise specified, obsessive compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder (due to low prevalence of ~6.5% each).
- Concurrent psychotherapy other than cognitive-behavioral therapy as provided in this study (to rule out other uncontrolled effects of concurrent psychotherapies)
- Presence of metallic implants that would interfere with safety during fMRI scanning (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, metal plates, etc.)
- Claustrophobia
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Treatment as usual plus UP CBT
Existing psychiatrist-administered psychopharmacotherapy plus weekly transdiagnostic CBT
|
The UP is an 18-session weekly cognitive behavioral intervention for anxiety and mood disorders
其他名称：
|
|
有源比较器：Treatment as usual
Existing psychiatrist-administered psychopharmacotherapy
|
Existing optimized pharmacotherapy as delivered by treating psychiatrist
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Reductions Over Time in Anxiety Symptoms as Measured by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
大体时间：Six months
|
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is a well-validated clinician administered rating of anxiety-related symptoms.
Ratings are made on a 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (most severe in frequency/duration/interference/distress) for each item (14 items), with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 56 calculated by summing scores of all 14 items.
Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
|
Six months
|
|
Reductions Over Time in Depression Symptoms as Measured by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
大体时间：Six months
|
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a well-validated clinician administered rating of depression-related symptoms.
Scores are calculated by summing scores across all 17-items, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 54.
Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
|
Six months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Acceptability as Measured by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
大体时间：Six months
|
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) is an 8-item scale that assesses perceptions of acceptability and quality of outpatient treatment.
Ratings are made on a 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent) scale for each item and then summed for a total score, with a minimum score of 8 and a maximum score of 32.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with treatment.
|
Six months
|
|
Association Between Anxiety Symptom Change (HAM-A) and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
大体时间：Six Months
|
Emotion regulation skills were assessed using a measure of emotion regulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale- DERS), a 36-item Likert-type scale (1-6) calculated by averaging scores across all items.
See Baseline Characteristics for baseline DERS score.
See Primary Outcome Measure for a description of HAM-A.
|
Six Months
|
|
Association Between Anxiety Symptom Change (HAM-A) and Reaction to Emotions (Affective Control Scale-ACS)
大体时间：6 months
|
Reactions to emotions, were assessed using the Affective Control Scale, or ACS, a 42-item Likert-type scale (1-7) calculated by averaging scores across all items.
See Baseline Characteristics for baseline ACS score.
See Primary Outcome Measure for description of HAM-A.
|
6 months
|
|
Association Between Anxiety Symptom Change (HAM-A) and Anxiety Sensitivity (Anxiety Sensitivity Index-ASI)
大体时间：6 months
|
Anxiety sensitivity, were assessed using the Anxiety Sensitivity Index, or ASI, a 16-item Likert-type scale (0-4) calculated by summing scores across items.
See Baseline Characteristics for baseline ASI scores.
See Primary Outcome Measures for a description of HAM-A.
|
6 months
|
|
Association Between Anxiety Symptom Change (HAM-A) and Neuroticism (NEO Five-Factor Inventory- NEO-FFI-N)
大体时间：6 months
|
Neuroticism was assessed using the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI-N) which is a subscale of the NEO-FFI, a 60-item Likert-type scale (1-5) calculated by summing scores for each subscale.
Only the 15-item Neuroticism subscale is included in this study.
See Baseline Characteristics for baseline NEO-FFI-N.
See Primary Outcome Measure for description of HAM-A.
|
6 months
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Association Between Change on Depression (HAM-D) and Baseline Resting State Functional Connectivity of Anterior Insula and Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex
大体时间：Six Months
|
Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data (non-task, eyes opened) was acquired to investigate anterior insula and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex functional connectivity as a predictor of change on depression (HAM-D).
See primary outcome description of HAM-D.
|
Six Months
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始
2013年6月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2014年12月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2014年12月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2013年7月1日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2013年7月1日
首次发布 (估计)
2013年7月4日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2017年5月12日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2017年5月10日
最后验证
2017年5月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.