此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Personalized and Scalable Cognitive Remediation Approaches

2026年6月19日 更新者:Alice Medalia、New York State Psychiatric Institute
The purpose of this study is to develop and pilot test personalized and scalable approaches to Cognitive Remediation (CR) for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. The intent is to more clearly define the therapeutic targets important to the facilitation of cognitive and functional improvement so that clinicians know how to customize cognitive interventions and deliver treatment in a more effective, efficient and personally relevant manner.

研究概览

详细说明

There are three phases of this study.

Phase 1: Development and Adaptation. The goal of this phase is to adapt currently used computer based CR approaches to make them more personalized and scalable. We will create two CR interventions which differ in choice and pacing of the cognitive exercises. This phase is complete.

Phase 2: Open Trial and Intervention Refinement. The goal of this phase is to obtain quantitative and qualitative feedback on the acceptability and usability of the interventions from participants to inform further refinement of the assessment and treatment packages. We will recruit ten subjects from an outpatient psychiatric rehabilitation program in New York City. After determining study eligibility, individuals will complete a standardized neuropsychological battery for schizophrenia assessment, and a 5-minute Tone Matching Test to assess basic auditory processing. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of two intervention packages, developed in Phase 1. Each session includes 60 minutes of computer-based learning activities and a 15 minute therapist-led discussion that links the computer activities to cognition as applied to daily tasks and recovery goals. Participants will complete a total of 10 sessions attending 2-3 times weekly for 5 weeks. During each session, participants will be asked to keep a log of software used. At the conclusion of this abbreviated trial, the participants will participate in focus groups in which they will be asked to provide verbal feedback on how enjoyable, engaging, and useful they perceived the computer and discussion based exercises to be. Participants will be asked to provide verbal feedback on the assessment procedures. CR clinicians will join the research team to discuss participants' engagement and their experience with administering the Tone Matching Test and interventions. Qualitative data summarized from participant logs and focus groups will be considered by the research team to refine the assessment battery, treatment parameters, and rubric of learning exercises. This phase is complete.

Phase 3: Pilot Feasibility Trial. People with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder may be referred by their treating clinician or may respond to posted advertisements to inquire about study participation. After being informed of study procedures, interested individuals will be asked to sign a consent form that documents willingness to participate in this study. Following informed consent, participants will be asked questions about demographic characteristics (e.g. age, education, employment), medication and psychosocial treatment status, psychiatric symptoms and symptoms severity, and will complete a brief assessment of estimated Intelligence. Those with an Intelligence Quotient (IQ) estimate below 70 or meeting substance dependence criteria at the time of evaluation will be exited from the study. In the same or second assessment session, participants will complete assessments of neuropsychological ability, current functioning, and motivation for treatment. Participants will then be randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions named "Brain Basics" or "Brain Exercises".

Each treatment condition is structured in a group format of up to 5 participants. Both treatments use commercially available computer-based training software to exercise cognitive skills such as speed of processing, attention, working memory, and verbal memory. Both conditions will entail 50 minutes on the computer and 10 minutes group discussion. In the discussion, participants review the cognitive activities they are working on and how they will help them achieve their recovery goals. The treatment phase will consist of 30 separate sessions each 60 minutes in duration, administered 3 times a week over the course of a 10-week period. Participants will be re-tested on outcome measures approximately 1 week following end of treatment, and again 3 months later.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

115

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • New York
      • Brooklyn、New York、美国、11206
        • Williamsburg Clinic
      • Brooklyn、New York、美国、11207
        • Institute for Community Living
      • New York、New York、美国、10032
        • Nyspi/ Cumc
      • New York、New York、美国、10040
        • The Bridge Inc
      • The Bronx、New York、美国、10467
        • FEGS Bronx Mental Health Clinic

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 65年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (DSM-IV) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  2. Age 18 to 65
  3. English speaking
  4. Psychiatrically stable, verified by current living/treatment status

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Indication of mental retardation, determined by estimated IQ of less than 70
  2. Hearing or visual impairment that precludes completing assessments
  3. Neurologic illness that may affect brain physiology (e.g. Parkinson's, seizure disorder, epilepsy)
  4. Current substance dependence symptoms in the past 6 weeks
  5. Participation in cognitive remediation in the 12 months prior to study entry.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
有源比较器:Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
有源比较器:Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matcher
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
有源比较器:Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Feasibility of Enrollment, Randomization and Retention
大体时间:Two years
Feasibility is measured by enrollment, acceptability of randomization defined as number initiated allocated treatment, retention of subjects defined as number completed allocated treatment
Two years

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Neurocognition From Baseline to Treatment End-point
大体时间:10 weeks
Change in neurocognition is calculated as the difference in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite Score between baseline and treatment end-point (10 weeks). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite T-Score is a scaled score calculated from the following component subscales: a) working memory; b) attention/vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) processing speed; f) reasoning and problem solving. The mean T-score is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on the scale mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
10 weeks
Change in Neurocognition From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up
大体时间:5.5 to 6 months
Change in neurocognition is calculated as the difference in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite Score between baseline and 3-month follow-up (5.5 to 6 months). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite T-Score is a scaled score calculated from the following component subscales: a) working memory; b) attention/vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) processing speed; f) reasoning and problem solving. The mean T-score is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on the scale mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
5.5 to 6 months

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory for Schizophrenia Research (IMI-SR)
大体时间:10 weeks
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory for Schizophrenia Research (IMI-SR), a 21 item 7-point Likert type scale designed to assess a participant's subjective experience of an activity, specifically in an experimental setting (e.g. "I enjoyed doing this activity very much"). The IMI-SR will be administered at the first and last treatment sessions.
10 weeks
Perceived Competency Scale (PCS)
大体时间:10 weeks
The PCS consists of 4 items on a 7-point Likert-type scale that assess feelings of competency when performing computer-based learning activities, with higher scores indicating greater perceived competency. The PCS will be administered at the first and last treatment sessions.
10 weeks
Change in Tone Matching Ability From Baseline to Treatment End-point
大体时间:10 weeks
Change in Tone Matching (percent correct) will be calculated as the difference between scores measured at baseline and treatment end-point (10 weeks), using pairs of 100-ms tones in series, with 500-ms inter-tone interval. The values on this scale range from 0% to 100% where higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
10 weeks
Change in UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA)-Brief From Baseline to Treatment End-point
大体时间:10 weeks
The UPSA - Brief is a proxy measure of daily functioning skills. Change from baseline to treatment end-point (10 weeks) will be assessed as the difference between the two scores. The scale score can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
10 weeks
Structured Clinical Interview for the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (SCI-PANSS) - Treatment End-point
大体时间:10 weeks
The SCI-PANSS is a semi-structured interview containing 30 items that assess symptoms of psychotic disorders including positive, negative and general psychopathology. Change from baseline to treatment end-point (10 weeks) will be assessed. Higher scores mean higher symptom severity. Change is calculated as the difference between the two scores. Greater change scores mean greater symptom improvement.
10 weeks
Change in Tone Matching Ability From Baseline to 3-month Follow up
大体时间:5.5 to 6 months
Change in Tone Matching (percent correct) will be calculated as the difference in scores assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up (5.5 to 6 months), using pairs of 100-ms tones in series, with 500-ms inter-tone interval. The values on this scale range from 0% to 100% where higher scores mean better outcomes. Greater change scores mean greater improvement.
5.5 to 6 months
Change in UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA)-Brief From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up
大体时间:5.5 to 6 months
The UPSA-Brief is a proxy measure for daily functioning skills. The scale score ranges from 0-100. Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up (5.5-6 months) will be assessed as the difference between the two scores. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
5.5 to 6 months
Structured Clinical Interview for the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (SCI-PANSS) - 3-month Follow-up
大体时间:5.5 to 6 months
The SCI-PANSS is a semi-structured interview containing 30 items that assess symptoms of psychotic disorders including positive, negative and general psychopathology. Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed.
5.5 to 6 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Alice Medalia, PhD、NYSPI

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2013年9月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2017年10月2日

研究完成 (实际的)

2019年3月20日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2013年9月13日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2013年9月13日

首次发布 (估计的)

2013年9月18日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月17日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月19日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

IPD 计划说明

This trial started enrolling participants before January 1, 2019.

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅