此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction in Palliative Cancer When They Return Home After Hospitalization in Palliative Care

2017年2月9日 更新者:Centre Francois Baclesse

The proposed work is part of a multidisciplinary approach to continuity of care in the particular context of the palliative phase of cancer. In conducting this study, we would like to characterize, at the regional level, satisfaction with the care of patients and their families in their care home situations palliative cancer. This evaluation will be based on questionnaires adapted versions in French language satisfaction questionnaires recently validated for patients in palliative situation and supported home care.

It will also identify the challenges faced by both patients, caregivers attending physicians.

The evaluation of these elements is a prerequisite to propose ways of improving at a hospital palliative care for output relay and anticipate the coordination of care for optimal care of the patient at home, to meet the expectations of different stakeholders, or even prevent certain readmissions "avoidable".

研究概览

地位

终止

详细说明

- Background and rationale of the research project Palliative care is defined, according to the French Society for Support and Palliative Care as acute care delivered in a comprehensive approach to the person with a serious illness, progressive or terminal. Their goal is to relieve physical pain and other symptoms, but also take into account the psychological, social and spiritual suffering. According to this definition, palliative care is interdisciplinary, cater to the patient as a person and his family, at home or in an institution and strive to preserve the best possible quality of life until death.

Very few studies on the quality of life for patients at end of life were conducted in France. Among them, the TRAPADO study is a prospective study to evaluate the quality of care, quality of life and impact on the environment in three parallel cohorts of cancer patients in palliative phase according to their choice of inpatient traditional in palliative care or home. The interim analysis of this study, was published in 2006 in the journal Bulletin of cancer: patients expressed a priority choice for the home; there was a marked alteration of the overall quality of life, as measured by the EORTC-QLQC30, no statistically significant difference between home and hospital; anxiety level was higher in the hospital. Relatives were satisfied with the care of the patient with a good perception of the family fabric and expressed a lower level of psychosocial distress at home. Nevertheless, the terminal readmissions were common with a large majority of hospital deaths.

More recently, Régis Aubry, in the framework of the National Observatory on End of Life (ONFV), has conducted an extensive field survey, published in March 2013, up to the caregivers who meet together near home but also health professionals involved in supporting patients at end of life. The report of this work highlights the importance of developing palliative care in the home including the intervention of specialized teams and coordination of teams working at home.

Indeed, in France, while 81% of the French would "spend their last moments at home" (FIFG, 2010), only 25.5% of deaths occur at home (ONFV, 2012).

Faced with this reality, we were asked to know what elements can explain this discrepancy between this reality and the desire of patients. This issue was the subject of a preliminary study, conducted in 2013 in Lower Normandy region. We chose to study the management of patients with cancer in palliative home situation by their GP after hospitalization Identified beds Palliative Care (LISP) Centre François Baclesse Caen: 19 of the 23 patients assessed, have expressed their willingness on the place of death to their GP, wanted to die at home. Nearly half (48%) of patients in our study died in the hospital. GPs interviewed reported that maintaining the homes of these patients had been facilitated by the relief of distressing symptoms and the establishment of aid.

This finding demonstrates that the GP can often not only coordinate the sometimes complex palliative situations, at home and that the intervention of specialized teams, interdisciplinary, is fundamental to maintaining a home in the best possible conditions.

But what about the patient felt about his quality of life at home? After collecting feedback from GPs Lower Normandy, we would like to continue this work. In this context, we propose a pilot study, single-center, to assess the satisfaction of patients and their families in home support palliative phase of cancer.

- Emerging nature of research topics covered: The proposed work is part of a multidisciplinary approach to continuity of care in the particular context of the palliative phase of cancer. In conducting this study, we would like to characterize, at the regional level, satisfaction with the care of patients and their families in their care home situations palliative cancer. This evaluation will be based on questionnaires adapted versions in French language satisfaction questionnaires recently validated for patients in palliative situation and supported home care.

It will also identify the challenges faced by both patients, caregivers attending physicians.

The evaluation of these elements is a prerequisite to propose ways of improving at a hospital palliative care for output relay and anticipate the coordination of care for optimal care of the patient at home, to meet the expectations of different stakeholders, or even prevent certain readmissions "avoidable".

- Degree of risk-taking and innovative scientific approach: The situation at the end of life patient palliative situation of cancer remains a research context underdeveloped. This study is based on the involvement of patients and their caregivers, at this stage of the disease to assess their satisfaction with care when returning home after a hospital palliative care. It proposes indeed used for this self-administered to patients and their caregivers questionnaires adapted questionnaires in French version of the research team CANHELP.

- Impact and potential consequences of the project: The proposed pilot study should document the satisfaction What patients in palliative situation of their cancer during their care at home, as well as those around them, at the regional level. The implementation of this project will also be used to validate the feasibility of involving these actors in the difficult context of the end of life, to understand their needs, difficulties and feelings regarding the effective care . Thereafter, it may be considered a larger study to complete these first results, before proposing ways to improve whose impact on satisfaction with care remain to be evaluated.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

4

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Caen、法国、14076
        • Centre François Baclesse

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient (s) age (s) of 18 or more;
  • Patient (s) reached (s) from cancer wholly palliative phase (estimated life expectancy of less than 3 months) in the judgment of the investigator;
  • Patient (s) hospital (s) in palliative care and candidate for a return home;
  • Patient (s) able to communicate with the investigator or his representative;
  • Patient (s) have received clear information on the diagnosis and prognosis of their disease;
  • Free and informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient (s) under guardianship or unable to give informed consent;
  • Patient (s) whose cognitive functions can not be questioned.
  • Patient (s) whose psychological distress does not participate in the study

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Medical telephonecontact
Evaluations will be conducted by telephone 15 days after hospital discharge, 30 days and then every month until 6 months.
Evaluations will be conducted by telephone 15 days after hospital discharge, 30 days and then every month until 6 months.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Patient care satisfaction
大体时间:15 days after their home return
Evaluation of satisfaction with the care of patients in palliative phase of cancer 15 days after their home return after hospitalization in palliative care.
15 days after their home return

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Satisfaction of the primary caregiver
大体时间:Satisfaction of the primary caregiver will be evaluated at day 15, months 1 to 6
Evaluation of the satisfaction of the primary caregiver of maintaining the home of his relatives with cancer in palliative phase
Satisfaction of the primary caregiver will be evaluated at day 15, months 1 to 6

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Patient quality of life
大体时间:Patient quality of life will be evaluated at day 15, months 1 to 6
Evaluation of the quality of life of patients at home over time.
Patient quality of life will be evaluated at day 15, months 1 to 6
The type and intensity of symptoms
大体时间:The type and intensity of symptoms will be evaluated on day 15, months1 to 6
Characterize the type and intensity of symptoms, physical and mental, and supported over time;
The type and intensity of symptoms will be evaluated on day 15, months1 to 6

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Marie-Christine GRACH, MD、Centre François Baclesse

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2014年6月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年3月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2016年3月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2014年8月1日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2014年8月1日

首次发布 (估计)

2014年8月4日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2017年2月10日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2017年2月9日

最后验证

2016年3月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • PALSATIS

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅