此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

PK Analysis of Piperacillin in Septic Shock Patients

2016年2月9日 更新者:Kristina Öbrink-Hansen、University of Aarhus

Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin in the Early Phase of Septic Shock - Does Standard Dosing Result in Therapeutic Plasma Concentrations?

Antibiotic dosing in septic shock patients poses a challenge for clinicians due to the pharmacokinetic changes seen in this population. Piperacillin/tazobactam is often used for empirical treatment, and initial appropriate dosing is crucial for reducing mortality.

We determined the pharmacokinetic profile of piperacillin 4g every 8 hour in 15 patients treated empirically for septic shock. A PK population model was established with the dual purpose to assess current standard treatment and to simulate alternative dosing regimens and modes of administration. Time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) predicted for each patient were evaluated against clinical breakpoint MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 mg/L). Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets evaluated were 100% f T>MIC and 50% fT>4xMIC.

研究概览

地位

完全的

干预/治疗

详细说明

Early appropriate antimicrobial therapy is of utmost importance for reducing mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. Patophysiological changes associated with the septic process, such as changes in volume of distribution (Vd), drug clearance (CL), decrease in plasma-protein concentration and organ dysfunction, lead to pharmacokinetic (PK) changes that may alter the efficacy of the antimicrobial given. As a consequence, antibiotic plasma concentrations are variable and hard to predict in these patients, which makes optimal antibiotic exposure a challenge, especially in the early phase of treatment. In sepctic shock patients, appropriate dosing is even more important, as effective antimicrobial therapy within the first hour of documented hypotension is associated with increased survival to hospital discharge.

Piperacillin/tazobactam is a β-lactam - β-lactamase inhibitor combination frequently used for empirical treatment in the critically ill. It is a time-dependent antibiotic where antibacterial activity is related to the time for which the free, unbound concentation of the drug is maintained above the minimal inhibitory concentration (f T>MIC). Maximizing f T>MIC both increases the therapeutic impact and reduces the risk of drug resistance development. Because of the PK changes seen in the critically ill, standard dosing of antimicrobials may result in subtherapeutic plasma-concentrations (17) and it has been suggested that current empiric dosing recommendations for ICU patients are inadequate and needs to be reconsidered (18). Patients with septic shock are especially vulnerable (7) and optimal dosing in these patients is crucial for reducing mortality.

Piperacillin/tazobactam 4g/0.5g every 8 hour (h) is the empiric standard dosing for sepsis and septic shock. The aim of this study was to determine if this dosing results in therapeutic plasma concentrations in septic shock patients, within the initial 24 hours of therapy. A PK population model was established with the dual purpose to assess current standard treatment and to simulate alternative dosing regimens and modes of administration.

Critically ill patients with known or suspected septic shock who required noradrenaline infusion and who were prescribed piperaillin/tazobactam 4g/0.5g (Tazocin®) by the treating physician were eligible for the study. Patients on renal replacement therapy and patients under the age of 18 were not included.

Piperacillin/tazobactam 4g/0.5g was administered intravenously (i.v.) over 3 minutes every 8 h. Blood samples (4 mL) were collected by trained staff from an arterial catheter around the time of administration of the third consecutive infusion. Each patient had a total of eight blood samples drawn; before administration of the drug (time 0), at 10, 20, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4 and 8 h after administration of the drug.

The unbound piperacillin plasma concentrations were determined using ultra high performance liquid chromatography. If a bacteria was isolated from a patient, a MIC to piperacillin was obtained using E-tests on Mueller-Hinton agar plates. These MICs as well as clinical MIC breakpoints according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used to evaluate the following PK/PD targets: 100% f T>MIC and 50% fT>4xMIC.

There was no intervention in the study.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

15

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Aarhus N、丹麦、8200
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

概率样本

研究人群

Critically ill patients with known or suspected septic shock admitted to the ICU, treated with piperacillin/tazobactam.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

Treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam for less than 24 hours. Treatment with noradrenaline. -

Exclusion Criteria:

Renal replacement therapy. Age under 18.

-

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Piperacillin pharmacokinetics
Patients with suspected septic shock who are treated with piperacillin/tazobactam.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
100% f T>MIC: Free Piperacillin Concentration Maintained Above the MIC Throughout the Dosing Interval.
大体时间:Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.
The piperacillin plasma concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment model. Each individual model predicted T>MIC was compared to clinical breakpoint MIC for P.aeruginosa (16 mg/L). The number of patients who achieved the pre-defined PK/PD target were reported.
Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.
50% fT>4xMIC: Free Piperacillin Concentration Maintained at a Level Fourfold the MIC for at Least 50% of the Dosing Interval.
大体时间:Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.
The piperacillin plasma concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment model. Each individual model predicted T>MIC was compared to clinical breakpoint MIC for P.aeruginosa (16 mg/L). The number of patients who achieved the pre-defined PK/PD target were reported.
Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
The Maximum Concentration of Piperacillin (Cmax)
大体时间:Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.
Maximum plasma concentration was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.
Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.
The Area Under the Plasma-concentration Time Curve Concentration-time Curve From 0-8 Hours After the Studied Dose (AUC 0-8)
大体时间:Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.
Area under the free plasma concentration-time curve (fAUC0-8) was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.
Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.
Trough Piperacillin Plasma Concentration (Cmin)
大体时间:Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.
Trough plasma concentration (Cmin) was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.
Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 研究主任:Merete Storgaard, MD、Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2014年9月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年1月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2015年1月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2014年12月1日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2014年12月1日

首次发布 (估计)

2014年12月3日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2016年2月11日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2016年2月9日

最后验证

2016年2月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅