此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Implementation of Knowledge-Based Palliative Care (KUPA)

2020年10月6日 更新者:Lund University

Implementation of Knowledge-Based Palliative Care for Frail Older Persons in Nursing Homes

The research on ageing during the last couple of decades has increasingly focused on questions regarding the quality of life and life satisfaction of the old people. Yet the research indicates that when it comes to the final stage of life, the end includes unnecessary suffering and the quality of life drops. Palliative care has traditionally been provided successfully to younger persons dying from incurable illnesses while older people dying of multiple morbidities or "old age" has received far less of this type of care. However, sixty percent of all people who died in Sweden in 2010 were at least 80 years old and it is well known that dying among older people often is a prolonged period of suffering. One reason might be that it is more difficult to identify when the final stages of life begins for older persons.

The purpose of this project is to implement and evaluate how a knowledge-based model for palliative care in nursing homes affects the quality of life and the participation in the care process for older persons in nursing homes and their next of kin. A second aim is to explore the staff's implementation process of palliative care and the role of the leadership. The final aim is to investigate which factors (barriers and facilitators) that affect the implementation process of this model.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

详细说明

The project was planned to be conducted using a cross-over design in two counties in south of Sweden based on a feasibility/pilot study that was conducted during fall 2014 co-created palliative care educational intervention through seminars for professionals in nursing homes. Due to a more significant amount of drop-outs compared with expected (and for not receiving the total amount of applied foundation), the plan needed to be revised. The knowledge-based palliative care intervention was conducted as a non-blinded control trial, implemented over a six-month period in 30 nursing homes in two different counties in the south of Sweden (County A and County B). The data collection was made in two sequential periods in each county. First, the intervention was implemented in ten nursing homes in County A (Kronoberg County from April 2015), while ten nursing homes in County B served as a control group. Then, County B implemented the intervention (Skåne county from April 2016), and ten new nursing homes in County A, which had not received the intervention, were chosen as a control group. After the two sequential time periods were data from one intervention and one control group analysed. The selection through voluntary participation resulted in a mixture of both larger and smaller nursing homes in the two counties, as well as both from urban and rural areas.

Every seminar group met once a month and included different professions (unit manager, district nurse, assistant nurse, and other staff i.e. occupational therapist and physiotherapist). There were 5 meetings in each nursing home during a period of 6 months.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

1151

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Kronoberg
      • Alvesta、Kronoberg、瑞典、34230
        • Bryggaren
      • Alvesta、Kronoberg、瑞典、34235
        • Högåsen
      • Grimslöv、Kronoberg、瑞典、34032
        • Asken
      • Ingelstad、Kronoberg、瑞典、360 44
        • Kvarngården
      • Konga、Kronoberg、瑞典、362 40
        • Konga Allhus
      • Lagan、Kronoberg、瑞典、34014
        • Åbrinken
      • Ljungby、Kronoberg、瑞典、34135
        • Ljungberga
      • Ljungby、Kronoberg、瑞典、34138
        • Ljungsätra
      • Ljungby、Kronoberg、瑞典、34183
        • Brunnsgården
      • Lönashult、Kronoberg、瑞典、34253
        • Torsgården
      • Moheda、Kronoberg、瑞典、34260
        • Furuliden
      • Ryd、Kronoberg、瑞典、360 10
        • Solängen
      • Tingsryd、Kronoberg、瑞典、362 30
        • Örnen
      • Urshult、Kronoberg、瑞典、360 13
        • Äppelgården
      • Vislanda、Kronoberg、瑞典、34250
        • Björkliden
      • Väckelsång、Kronoberg、瑞典、362 51
        • Solhaga
      • Växjö、Kronoberg、瑞典、352 41
        • Birkagården
      • Växjö、Kronoberg、瑞典、352 44
        • Hovslund
      • Växjö、Kronoberg、瑞典、352 64
        • Evelid
      • Älmeboda、Kronoberg、瑞典、360 23
        • Älmegården
    • Skåne
      • Höör、Skåne、瑞典、24395
        • Skogsgläntan
      • Kågeröd、Skåne、瑞典、28677
        • Åsgården
      • Lund、Skåne、瑞典、224 60
        • Mårtenslund
      • Lund、Skåne、瑞典、22460
        • Brunnslyckan
      • Lund、Skåne、瑞典、22466
        • Norrdala
      • Osby、Skåne、瑞典、283 42
        • Rönnebacken
      • Svalöv、Skåne、瑞典、26834
        • Solgården
      • Svedala、Skåne、瑞典、23338
        • Holmagården
      • Södra Sandby、Skåne、瑞典、24731
        • Fästan
      • Teckomatorp、Skåne、瑞典、26872
        • Ängslyckan

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older persons living in the participating nursing homes
  • Next of kin to older persons living in the participating nursing homes
  • Staff working at the participating nursing homes
  • Managers working at the participating nursing homes
  • The participating nursing homes must be located in either Kronoberg County or Skåne County in Sweden

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not being cognitive able to participate in interviews or answering the questionnaires

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:顺序分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Kronoberg Educational Intervention
The educational intervention is provided to ten nursing homes.
The seminar groups will be led by two experienced clinical nurses and researchers from the field of palliative care and geriatric care. The educational material consist of six themes; values in palliative care, symptom relief, dignity and a dignified death, collaborative co-creating care, support to next of kin and dialogue with older persons and next of kin about death and dying. The content of the different themes will have a common core for each nursing home but will be adjusted based on the expressed needs of each nursing home. New themes can be created related to the needs of the unique nursing home. The participants in the seminar groups will reflect together over the content of the developed binder of educational material and will relate it to their own work in order to identify areas suitable for changes and/or development.
无干预:Skåne Control
The control group consists of an equal number of nursing homes. This group receives no intervention.
实验性的:Skåne Educational Intervention
The educational intervention is provided to ten nursing homes.
The seminar groups will be led by two experienced clinical nurses and researchers from the field of palliative care and geriatric care. The educational material consist of six themes; values in palliative care, symptom relief, dignity and a dignified death, collaborative co-creating care, support to next of kin and dialogue with older persons and next of kin about death and dying. The content of the different themes will have a common core for each nursing home but will be adjusted based on the expressed needs of each nursing home. New themes can be created related to the needs of the unique nursing home. The participants in the seminar groups will reflect together over the content of the developed binder of educational material and will relate it to their own work in order to identify areas suitable for changes and/or development.
无干预:Kronoberg Control
The control group consists of an equal number of nursing homes. This group receives no intervention.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
大体时间:9 months

World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) measure quality of life for older persons' at the end of life living in nursing homes.

Five-point Likert-scale. Higher values mean better outcomes. Total score Min 26. Max 130.

The range for the sub scale Overall Quality of Life; Min 1 Max 5 The range for the sub scale General health; Min 1 Max 5 The range for the sub scale Physical Health; Min 7 Max 35 The range for the sub scale Psychological; Min 6 Max 30 The range for the sub scale Social relationships; Min 3 Max 15 The range for the sub scale Environment; Min 8 Max 40

9 months
World Health Organization Quality of Life-OLD (WHOQOL-OLD)
大体时间:9 months

World Health Organization Quality of Life-OLD (WHOQOL-OLD) measure quality of life for older persons living in nursing homes.

Five point Likert-scale. Higher value means better outcome. Min 24. Max. 120. The range for the all the sub scales are; Min 1 Max 20

9 months
Person-centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT)(Patient Version)
大体时间:9 months

Person-centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) (patient version) measure person-centred care for older persons living in nursing homes. Five point Likert-scale. Higher score means better outcomes. Min 13. Max. 65.

The range for the sub scale Extent of personalizing care; Min 8 Max 40 The range for the sub scale Amount of organizational and environmental support; Min 5 Max 25

9 months
Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ Patient Version)
大体时间:9 months

Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ patient version) measure person-centred care for older persons living in nursing homes. Six point Likert-scale. Higher score means better outcome. Min 17. Max. 102.

The range for the sub scale Safety; Min 10 Max 60 The range for the sub scale Everydayness; Min 4 Max 24 The range for the sub scale Hospitality; Min 3 Max 18

9 months
Next-of-Kin Participation in Care (NoK-PiC); Psychometric Evaluation
大体时间:9 months

Next-of-Kin Participation in Care (NoK-PiC) measure participation for next of kin to older persons in nursing homes. The study includes both intervention and control groups. The two scales are 1) Communication and Trust (CaT); and 2) Collaboration in Care (CiC).

The scales contains nine items each and items are scored from 0 to 4 (agree not at all (=0); agree to a low degree (=1); agree partly (=2); agree to a high degree (=3); and agree totally (=4). The possible score range from 0 to 36 in each of the two scales, and from 0-72 in the total scale. Higher score means better outcomes. This results are based upon a recently published psychometric evaluation by Westergren et al (2020).

9 months
World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) for Next of Kin
大体时间:9 months

World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) measure quality of life for next of kin to older persons in nursing homes. Five-point Likert-scale. Higher values mean better outcomes. Min 26. Max 130.

he range for the sub scale Overall Quality of Life; Min 1 Max 5 The range for the sub scale General health; Min 1 Max 5 The range for the sub scale Physical Health; Min 7 Max 35 The range for the sub scale Psychological; Min 6 Max 30 The range for the sub scale Social relationships; Min 3 Max 15 The range for the sub scale Environment; Min 8 Max 40

9 months

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Person-centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) (Staff Version)
大体时间:6 months

Person-centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT)(staff version) measure person-centred care for staff working in nursing homes. Five-point Likert-scale. Higher values mean better outcomes. Min 13. Max 65.

The range for the sub scale Extent of personalizing care; Min 8 Max 40 The range for the sub scale Amount of organizational and environmental support; Min 5 Max 25

6 months
Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ-S)
大体时间:6 months

Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ-S) measure person-centred care for staff working in nursing homes. Six-point Likert-scale. Higher values mean better outcomes. Min 14. Max 84.

The range for the sub scale Safety; Min 5 Max 30 The range for the sub scale Everydayness; Min 5 Max 30 The range for the sub scale Community; Min 4 Max 24

6 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Gerd Ahlström, PhD、Department of Health Sciences, Lund University

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2015年4月9日

初级完成 (实际的)

2017年6月20日

研究完成 (实际的)

2017年10月15日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2016年2月26日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2016年3月9日

首次发布 (估计)

2016年3月15日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年10月28日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2020年10月6日

最后验证

2020年10月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 2014-2759
  • 2014-0071 (其他赠款/资助编号:The Vardal Foundation)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅