Reappraising Intergeneration Relationships in Dementia Caregiving
Reappraising Intergeneration Relationships in Dementia Caregiving Through Perspective Taking
It is hypothesized that reappraising intergeneration relationships through perspective-taking will enhance the well-being of adult-child caregivers. Incorporating both psychological and social perspectives, the study makes a unique contribution to address research gaps by evaluating an integrated model of intervention for dementia caregivers. The conceptual model involves the following components: 1) relational insights; 2) self-reflection to integrate the challenges and benefits in caregiving; 3) interpersonal empathy
To test the incremental value of perspective-taking reappraisals, the study involves a two-arm randomized controlled trial of 12 weeks of intervention with two conditions: 1) Reappraisal through Perspective Taking and 2) Basic Skill Building. Telephone-administered sessions are integrated with group sessions and home visits to maximize sustainability and accessibility of the intervention. One hundred fifty-four participants will be recruited and randomized. Primary outcomes are reduced depressive symptoms and enhanced psychological well-being for the caregivers. Secondary outcomes include enhanced social support for caregivers and reduced behavioral problems in the care-recipients.
研究概览
详细说明
The proposed study aims to address a major research gap in caregiving interventions in the context of intergeneration perspective-taking reappraisals. Adult child caregivers are part of a sandwich generation, involved in actualizing their own goals and coping with social expectations to care for their elderly parents. Dementia caregiving presents a particular challenge in life transition wherein the adult child is parenting his or her parents. With global aging, people living with dementia are rising exponentially. This presents a challenge for sustainable care in Hong Kong and also in countries where public services are developing and the demand for family and intergeneration caregiving is high due to collectivistic concerns. It is hypothesized that reappraising intergeneration relationships through perspective-taking will enhance the well-being of adult-child caregivers. Incorporating both psychological and social perspectives, the study makes a unique contribution to address research gaps by evaluating an integrated model of intervention for dementia caregivers. The conceptual model involves the following components: 1) relational insights; 2) self-reflection to integrate the challenges and benefits in caregiving; 3) interpersonal empathy.
Most caregiving psycho-education programs involve skill training including scheduling pleasant events, communicating with the care recipient and other family members. To test the incremental value of perspective-taking reappraisals, the study involves a two-arm randomized controlled trial of 12 weeks of intervention with two conditions: 1) Perspective Taking Reappraisal and 2) Basic Skill Building. Telephone-administered sessions are integrated with home visits to maximize sustainability and accessibility of the intervention. One hundred fifty-four participants will be recruited and randomized. Primary outcomes are reduced depressive symptoms and enhanced psychological well-being for the caregivers. Secondary outcomes include enhanced social support for caregivers and reduced behavioral problems in the care-recipients. Measures are obtained at baseline Weeks 1 (baseline), 6 and 12 with a follow-up at Week 24. Findings have implications for enhancing sustainable care for older adults in the wider society.
研究类型
注册 (预期的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Hong Kong、香港
- 招聘中
- Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
-
接触：
- Alma Au, PhD
- 电话号码：85227665504
- 邮箱：ssalma@polyu.edu.hk
-
Kowloon、香港
- 招聘中
- Institute of Active Ageing
-
接触：
- Alma Au, PhD
- 电话号码：7746 852-2766-7746
- 邮箱：alma.au@polyu.edu.hk
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion criteria are as follows
- Primary caregivers aged 20 or older and who have been caring for persons (aged 60 or above) with a physician diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in the mild to moderate range as determined by the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale.
- Primary caregivers who have been providing unpaid care for more than 12 hours a week for at least the past three months.
- The care should involve day-to-day decision-making as well as any of the following: feeding, dressing, bathing, toileting, housework, preparing meals, medication and handling finances.
- They can be daughter/son or daughter-/son-in-law of the care recipient.
Exclusion criteria are as follows:
- signs of severe intellectual deficits
- demonstrated suicidal ideation
- exhibited evidence of psychotic disorders
- hearing/ visual impairment
- inability to read or speak Chinese/Cantonese fluently and severe.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Perspective Taking Reappraisal
This arm focuses on reappraisals with perspective taking with a limited amount of basic skill building
|
Interventions involving 1) appreciating relational insights; 2) enhancing self-awareness; 3) empathetic understanding of care-recipient; 4) integrating self-care and caring for others and 5) negotiation.
These skill-building exercises are commonly used in psycho-education programs for caregivers:monitoring mood and activities, relaxation techniques and scheduling pleasant events, basic communication with the care recipient, communicating the caregivers' own needs with other family member or related persons including helpers and professional staff.
|
|
其他：Basic Skill Building
This arm focuses on basic skill building only.
|
These skill-building exercises are commonly used in psycho-education programs for caregivers:monitoring mood and activities, relaxation techniques and scheduling pleasant events, basic communication with the care recipient, communicating the caregivers' own needs with other family member or related persons including helpers and professional staff.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Search Results Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression
大体时间：Week 1, 6, 12, 24
|
20-item measure that asks caregivers to rate how often over the past week they The scale rates experienced symptoms associated with depression.. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time).
Scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater level of having depressive symptoms.
|
Week 1, 6, 12, 24
|
|
Change in Ryff's Psychological Well-being
大体时间：Weeks 1,6, 12, 24
|
The 18-version of the scale taps the six areas of psychological well-being: autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, positive relations with others, purpose in life, and self-acceptance.
Respondents rate statements on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 indicating strong disagreement and 6 indicating strong agreement.
The range of scores is from 0 to 108.
Higher scores suggest higher levels of well-being.
The subscale score of each of the six areas can be calculating by summation of the three items associated with each of the area.
|
Weeks 1,6, 12, 24
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Revised Memory and Problem Checklist
大体时间：Weeks 1, 6, 12 ,24
|
The checklist is a 24-item caregiver-report measure provides a total score plus scores for three subscale memory-related problems, affective distress and disruptive behaviors.
Scores are computed for the presence or absence of each problem first, and then for caregiver "reaction" or the extent to which caregivers were "bothered" or "distressed" by each behavior.
The caregivers' reaction to each behavior, or the extent of distress experienced, were scored as follows: Reactions are assessed by asking how "upsetting" the behavior was on a Likert scale of 0 to 4 (0 = Not at all, 1= a little, 2 = moderately, 3 = very much, and 4 =extremely).
Frequency of behaviors are assessed based on a Likert-scale of 0 to 4 (0 = never occurs, 1 = occurs infrequently and not in the last week, 2 = occurred 1-2 times in the last week, 3 = occurred 3-6 times in the last week, and 4 = occurs daily or more often).
The range of score is from 0 to 96, higher scores suggesting greater disruption.
|
Weeks 1, 6, 12 ,24
|
|
Change in MacArther Social Support Scales
大体时间：Weeks 1,6, 12, 24
|
The measure the levels of emotional and instrumental social support experienced by the caregivers.
The scale consists of 12 items assesses the frequency of receipt of 3 categories of social support: emotional support, instrumental support and negative interaction involving conflict or excessive demands.
The participants scored each item on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (frequently).
The range of scores is from 0 to 48, with higher score indicating better social support.
|
Weeks 1,6, 12, 24
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Alma Au, PhD、Hong Kong Polytechnic University
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (预期的)
研究完成 (预期的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.