Multidisciplinary Health Educational Program Based on Centered People Care Model in Parkinson's Disease (AMPARO)
Multidisciplinary Health Educational Program Based on Centered People Care Model in Parkinson's Disease: Comparison Between Remote and Face-to-face Delivery
The objective of this study is to compare the effects of two similar long-term interprofessional programs, one of them delivers by in-person classes, and another delivers by online classes on the quality of life of people with Parkinson's.
Method: People with PD will be randomized into 3 groups: (1) Face-to-face group, in which participants, in groups of 10 persons, followed a multidisciplinary health education program composed of 10 monthly face-to-face lectures; (2) Remote group, in which individuals followed the same lectures delivered by online; and (3) Control group, in which participants followed no lecture. The participants will be evaluated before (BED) and after (ABP) the education program conclusion (10 lectures). Health quality of life was adopted as a primary outcome. Independence in daily living activities, motor and non-motor symptoms severity, and global cognitive capacity was adopted as secondary measures, Besides, all participants will be asked to answer a survey to evaluate the knowledge improvement of key learning points of lectures. The results will be analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures.
研究概览
详细说明
Parkinson's disease is a large cause of disability worldwide. The complex combination of motor and non-motor symptoms brings an increasing impairment in functionality and, consequently, a progressively decrease in the quality of life of the people living with PD and their families. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that for health care, especially in chronic diseases, care should be centered on the person (people-centered care). This model enlarges the focus on biological aspects, including psychological and social aspects, building a multidimensional perspective on an individual, which can only be reached by integrated and interprofessional care.
According to this model, education is crucial to empower the person to occupy an active role in the health process, gaining greater control over decisions and actions affecting their health. Patient empowerment has been associated with positive health and clinical outcomes, including improved disease management, effective use of health services, improved health status, and medication adherence. However, there are several barriers for participants to attending this kind of program. Reasons for nonparticipation include mobility-reducing physical health issues, time constraints, distance, insufficient funds, lack of respite care if caring for someone else, and transportation. Thus, using a home-based video class may be one opportunity to reduce these known barriers and improve the accessibility of education programs. This delivery strategy can be beneficial for no high-income countries.
Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the effects of two similar long-term interprofessional programs, one of them delivers by in-person classes, and another delivers by online classes on the quality of life of people with Parkinson's.
Method: People with a confirmed diagnosis of Idiopathic Parkinson's disease, in stage 1-4 of disease evolution according to Hoehn and Yahr classification will be randomized into 3 groups: (1) Face-to-face group (FFG), in which participants, in groups of 10 persons, followed a multidisciplinary health education program composed of 10 monthly face-to-face lectures; (2) Remote group (RG), in which individuals followed the same lectures delivered by online; and (3) Control group (CG), in which participants followed no lecture. People who have severe cognitive decline and uncorrected visual or hearing impairment will be excluded. Participants from both groups will be instructed to follow their usual routine for the treatment of the disease. The lectures on the management of motor and non-motor alterations associate with PD will be offered by a nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, neurologist, lawyer, nutritionist, and psychologist. The participants will be evaluated before (BED) and after (ABP) the education program conclusion (10 lectures). Health quality of life, adopted as a primary outcome, will be evaluated by Parkinson´s disease questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). The independence in daily living activities, motor and non-motor symptoms severity, and global cognitive capacity, adopted as secondary measures, will be evaluated by Unified Parkinson´s disease rating scale (UPDRS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), respectively. Besides, all participants will be asked to answer a survey to evaluate the knowledge improvement of key learning points of lectures. The survey consisted of 20 questions (2 per lecture) where the minimum level (score 0) indicated the absence of knowledge and maximal level (score 5) indicated the full understanding of lectures' key points. The results will be analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures considering as factor group (FFG, RG, CG) and assessment points (BED, AEP).
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
SP
-
Sao Paulo、SP、巴西、05360-160
- Department of Physiotherapy, Communication Science & Disorders, Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical diagnosis of Idiopathic Parkinson's disease Must have acess to internet.
Exclusion Criteria:
Severe cognitive decline Severe visual impairment Severe hearing impairment
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Face-to-face group
Face-to-face group (FFG), in which participants, in groups of 10 persons, followed a multidisciplinary health education program composed of 10 monthly face-to-face lectures
|
The education program consist of 10 lectures on the management of motor and non-motor alterations associate with PD will be offered by a nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, neurologist, lawyer, nutritionist, and psychologist.
|
|
有源比较器:Remote group
Remote group (RG), in which individuals followed 10 monthly remote lectures
|
The education program consist of 10 lectures on the management of motor and non-motor alterations associate with PD will be offered by a nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, neurologist, lawyer, nutritionist, and psychologist.
|
|
假比较器:Control group
Control group (CG), in which participants followed no education program (lectures)
|
Participants will follow no education program (lecture) and will be instructed to follow their usual routine for the treatment of the disease
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Health related Quality of life
大体时间:baseline and immediately after the end of intervention
|
Parkinson´s disease questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39), PDQ-39 is a widely used and acknowledged disease-specific, self-reported questionnaire.
It contains 39 questions covering eight distinct domains: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional wellbeing, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort.
The score for each question ranges from 0 to 4 points, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived problems.
A change of ≥1.6 points on the PDQ-39 total score after 6 months represents a minimally clinically important difference
|
baseline and immediately after the end of intervention
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Unifed Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores
大体时间:baseline and immediately after the end of intervention
|
UPDRS - Part I: Non-Motor Experiences of Daily Living which has six rater-based items and seven for patient self-assessment; UPDRS - Part II: Motor experiences of daily living, with 13 patient-based items; UPDRS - Part III: Motor examination, 18 items based on clinical tests.
Each item scores from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) and total scores are obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores for each part.
|
baseline and immediately after the end of intervention
|
|
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores
大体时间:baseline and immediately after the end of intervention
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): The 30-point designed to detect mild cognitive impairment and reportedly takes <10 min to administer with scores <26 defined as abnormal.
|
baseline and immediately after the end of intervention
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (预期的)
研究完成 (预期的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.