此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

COvid Pandemic Institutional maNaGement (COPING)

2021年5月27日 更新者:Hospices Civils de Lyon

Institutional Management and Professional Experience During the Pandemic COVID-19 by Health Care Institutions in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region: Assessment and Lessons Learned

Covid-19 has increased organizational tensions within health services (lack of resources, difficulties in recruiting healthcare professionals , elderly and polypathological patients, etc.) and tested the reliability of health facilities. This project aims to draw lessons so that hospitals can transform themselves while improving their reliability to face future crises and other exceptional situations.

Research hypothesis:

Crisis management arrangements lack sensitivity to uncertainty, which manifests itself in lower quality of care and efficiency losses for the entire institution.

The virtuous practices implemented during the crisis spontaneously incorporated principles of the highly reliable organization.

The integration of principles from complexity theory into the management of institutions promotes high reliability organization.

Sustaining these virtuous practices in order to anticipate and cope with crises requires the activation of two interconnected levers: a shared vision (by patients, healthcare professionals, ARS, HAS, and the Ministry in the first place) of the meaning of the action taken by hospitals, and the development of a policy enabling hospitals to become both learning and highly reliable.

Main objective:

To evaluate the management process of the Covid-19 epidemic by the university hospitals of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, and the structures linked to them (establishments in their territory, ARS, user associations), in terms of points of improvement and good practices. This evaluation concerns the preparation, management and exit phases of the crisis.

研究概览

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (预期的)

20000

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

      • Clermont-Ferrand、法国、63003
        • 招聘中
        • CHU Clermont-Ferrand , Pôle de Santé Publique, unité d'Epidémiologie, Economie de la Santé et Prévention
        • 接触:
      • Grenoble、法国、38700
        • 招聘中
        • CHU Grenoble, Pôle Santé Publique, service de veille sanitaire
        • 接触:
      • Lyon、法国、69002
        • 招聘中
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon, DOQ-RU
        • 接触:
      • Saint-Étienne、法国、42055

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

  • Professionals and members of the institutions' bodies in the 4 university hospitals: Lyon, St Etienne, Clermont Ferrand, Grenoble
  • Adult patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours during the first wave of the pandemic COVID-19 in the 4 university hospitals: Lyon, St Etienne, Clermont Ferrand, Grenoble

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Establishments :

    • 4 university hospitals: Lyon, St Etienne, Clermont Ferrand, Grenoble
    • Establishments in the same territories, public and private
  • Professionals and members of the institutions' bodies:

    • Governance: management and chair of the CME
    • Management (care, communication, medical, technical, logistics, IT, personnel)
    • Clinical and public health cluster governance
    • Medical, paramedical and non-medical staff in the departments most concerned (emergency and EMS reception, intensive care, infectiology, hygiene, virology, imaging, occupational medicine in particular)
    • Organizations representing the personnel
    • Members of the users' representatives committee
  • Adult patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours during the study period (quantitative study by questionnaires).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Professional qualitative group
Qualitative analysis of crisis management by interviewing professionals most involved during the crisis in each university hospital.

3 individual interviews with the different categories of professionals most involved during the crisis in each university hospital. In the first phase, the points of improvement identified will be analyzed In the second phase, good practices and innovations will be analyzed. For these first two phases, the duration of one hour was chosen because it is difficult to mobilize the professionals for longer. Individual interviews are preferred, but group interviews are possible with no more than three people so that everyone can express himself or herself. Finally, individual interviews of 15 to 30 minutes will be conducted with some of the people interviewed previously in order to identify the costs of the dysfunctions or problems encountered during the crisis.

Questionnaires with establishments associated with the crisis management, the ARS AuRA and France Assos Santé AuRA.

Analysis of evidence documents in the university hospitals

Professional quantitative group
Quantitative analysis of crisis management using the WHO grid adapted sent to the target persons identified within the establishments

A self-assessment of the three phases of the crisis management process (preparation, crisis management, crisis recovery) will be carried out in the participating establishments using the WHO grid with the target persons identified within the establishments.

This step will use the crisis response assessment tool developed by the WHO following the H1N1 pandemic in 2011. This grid will be adapted beforehand to the COVID-19 situation and to the local organization by the study's scientific committee. The dimensions investigated will be : Command and control, Communication, Safety and security, Triage, Surge capacity, Continuity of essential services; Human resources, Logistics and supply management, Post-disaster recovery.

The grids will be sent to the 4 university hospitals to be filled in with the target audience recommended by the WHO methodological guide.

The results of this self-assessment will be linked to and interpreted with the results of the interviews in phase 1.

Patient quantitative group
Quantitative analysis of crisis management using a questionnaire sent to patients hospitalized in the first wave asking them about their perception of crisis and post-crisis management.

A questionnaire of patients' perceptions on the same perimeter (crisis and post-crisis management, from the point of view of points of improvement and good practices) will be constructed and sent by the management of the establishments to all patients hospitalized for 48 hours or more during the first wave and who have left their email address (methods similar to the e-satis survey). The online questionnaire survey is preferred in order to get away from the emotion and for feasibility reasons. This patient experience questionnaire adapted to COVID will be co-constructed with expert/partner patients and user associations.

Four dimensions will be investigated : The perception of the quality of the information received by the patient, The nature of the information on the specific health protection protocol from which the patient benefited, The patient's consideration of the overall context, during and after, The effects of the health context on the overall management of the patient

Tools development
Development of tools to prepare for situations of uncertainty

Development of tools to prepare for situations of uncertainty : In the third phase of the project, design thinking workshops will be organized (within the HCL) to develop training (in the form of simulation) in order to appropriate virtuous practices in situations of uncertainty. The purpose of these training sessions will be to improve the institution's ability to learn in a situation of uncertainty and thus to develop its reliability.

The aim of these workshops is to provide tools for raising awareness of situations of uncertainty to all hospital staff.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Crisis management process based on a qualitative approach
大体时间:The Qualitative analysis (intervention 1) will take place from September, 2020 to December, 2021
The qualitative evaluation (interviews, document review) will make it possible to identify the points of improvement and virtuous practices implemented in the establishments.
The Qualitative analysis (intervention 1) will take place from September, 2020 to December, 2021
Crisis management process based on a quantitative approach with the professionals (identified within the establishments)
大体时间:The Quantitative analysis for professionals (intervention 2) will be conducted from March, 2021 to June 2021.
The quantitative evaluation will be based on the WHO checklist. This first part will report, for each hospital, the proportion of items validated in each dimension of the WHO checklist (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/hospital-emergency-response-checklist):
The Quantitative analysis for professionals (intervention 2) will be conducted from March, 2021 to June 2021.
Crisis management process based on a quantitative approach with the patients (hospitalized in the first wave)
大体时间:The Quantitative analysis for patients (intervention 3) will be conducted from March, 2021 to June 2021. The tool development phase (intervention 4) will be carried out from January, 2022 to June, 2022

The second quantitative evaluation will be based on patients' perceptions with a constructed questionnaire on theses perimeters: crisis and post-crisis management, from the point of view of points of improvement and good practices.

This patient experience questionnaire will be adapted to COVID with expert/partner patients and user associations.

The Quantitative analysis for patients (intervention 3) will be conducted from March, 2021 to June 2021. The tool development phase (intervention 4) will be carried out from January, 2022 to June, 2022

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2020年9月1日

初级完成 (预期的)

2021年12月1日

研究完成 (预期的)

2022年9月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2021年5月17日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2021年5月27日

首次发布 (实际的)

2021年6月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2021年6月1日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2021年5月27日

最后验证

2021年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅