Management of Acute Complicated Diverticulitis: An Assessment of Current Practices
Acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) is a frequent surgical emergency that can be life-threatening. It encompasses various clinical entities, including colonic perforations, abscesses (Hinchey II), fistulas, and purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey III/IV). Historically, the Hartmann procedure (HP) was established as the standard of care for diffuse peritonitis, particularly in frail patients. However, this intervention is associated with high rates of permanent stomas, long-term complications, and impaired quality of life. Over the past decade, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared HP with sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis (PA), sometimes combined with a diverting ileostomy. Results from these studies, notably the LADIES and DIVERTI trials, indicate that in hemodynamically stable and immunocompetent patients, PA is associated with superior functional outcomes, fewer late complications, and higher stoma reversal rates. Other minimally invasive approaches, such as laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for Hinchey III, have also been explored, showing promise in reducing stomas and reinterventions. However, their efficacy relies on stringent patient selection, and their use is not recommended by current guidelines (e.g., HAS 2017) due to higher reintervention rates. Recent epidemiological data suggest a trend toward reducing emergency surgical interventions in favor of more conservative strategies in selected cases, such as initial medical management followed by elective surgery. In this context of diversifying therapeutic options, choosing the optimal treatment requires a delicate balance between efficacy, morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and long-term preservation of intestinal function. Despite these advances, several questions remain, particularly regarding patient selection criteria and the real-world long-term impact of these interventions. A potentially underestimated factor is the role of the operator, as a significant portion of emergency cases (nights and weekends) are handled by surgeons in training.
Primary Objective: To provide a comprehensive overview of current management strategies for acute complicated diverticulitis by identifying preferred therapeutic modalities (conservative management, emergency surgery, delayed surgery) at the HUB (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles).
Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the adherence of these therapeutic approaches to international guidelines. To identify clinical and context-specific predictive factors influencing the choice of therapeutic strategy.
研究概览
地位
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Brussels Capital
-
Anderlecht、Brussels Capital、比利时、1070
- Institut Jules Bordet
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients presenting with a first episode or recurrence of acute complicated diverticulitis.
- CT scan confirmation of a Hinchey stage ≥ Ib (including stages Ib, II, III, and IV) at admission.
- Initial management performed within the HUB (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles) network.
- Hospital admission between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2024.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, defined by a CT scan Hinchey stage of 0 or Ia.
- Patients in whom the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis was ultimately ruled out during medical chart review.
- Patients whose initial management occurred at another hospital facility (outside the HUB network).
- Incomplete medical records preventing the reliable extraction of clinical or follow-up data.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Distribution of management strategies for acute complicated diverticulitis.
大体时间:From hospital admission up to 10 years (end of study period).
|
Percentage of patients treated by each of the following strategies: exclusive medical treatment, radiological drainage, immediate emergency surgery, rescue surgery following medical failure, or elective surgery.
|
From hospital admission up to 10 years (end of study period).
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Procedure Type (Hartmann Procedure vs. Primary Anastomosis) based on Hinchey Classification and Clinical Status.
大体时间:Through study completion, an average of 14 days (duration of index hospitalization).
|
The study will evaluate the association between baseline clinical parameters (including age and immunosuppression status) and radiological severity, assessed by the Hinchey classification (stages Ib to IV on admission CT scan), with the final therapeutic choice.
Logistic regression analysis will be used to identify independent predictors for: (1) failure of conservative treatment and (2) selection of surgical procedure type (Hartmann Procedure vs.
Primary Anastomosis).
Results will be reported as Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals.
|
Through study completion, an average of 14 days (duration of index hospitalization).
|
|
Success rate of conservative treatment for complicated diverticulitis.
大体时间:During index hospitalization (average of 12.4 days).
|
Proportion of patients successfully managed without surgery during the index hospitalization.
|
During index hospitalization (average of 12.4 days).
|
|
Post-operative morbidity and mortality.
大体时间:30 days post-surgery.
|
Percentage of patients with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) and mortality rate at 30 days post-surgery.
|
30 days post-surgery.
|
|
Stoma reversal rate.
大体时间:Up to 10 years.
|
Percentage of patients who received a temporary stoma and successfully underwent surgical restoration of bowel continuity during the follow-up period.
|
Up to 10 years.
|
|
Evolution of the Rate of Laparoscopic Approach.
大体时间:Perioperative (during initial surgery).
|
Percentage of patients undergoing a laparoscopic approach (including converted laparoscopies) compared to open surgery.
The trend will be analyzed across three time periods (2015-2017, 2018-2020, 2021-2024) to assess the adoption of minimally invasive techniques.
|
Perioperative (during initial surgery).
|
|
Length of Hospital Stay (LOS).
大体时间:From hospital admission to discharge (average 10-14 days).
|
Number of days from hospital admission to discharge.
The median length of stay will be compared across the three time periods (2015-2017, 2018-2020, 2021-2024) to evaluate the impact of changing clinical practices.
|
From hospital admission to discharge (average 10-14 days).
|
|
Adherence to Guidelines Regarding Peritoneal Lavage.
大体时间:Perioperative (during initial surgery).
|
Percentage of surgical cases where peritoneal lavage was performed as a standalone treatment (without resection).
The evolution of this practice will be assessed across the three time periods to evaluate adherence to international guidelines (EAES/WSES) recommending the abandonment of this technique.
|
Perioperative (during initial surgery).
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.