Pilot Study of Salivary Bile Acids and Pepsin as Predictive Biomarkers of Reflux Disease After Sleeve Gastrectomy (ABSORB)

The ABSORB study is a multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study designed to explore whether salivary bile acids and pepsin may serve as noninvasive biomarkers of reflux-related esophageal disease after sleeve gastrectomy. The study focuses on adults undergoing sleeve gastrectomy as part of routine clinical care and without previous conclusive reflux-related esophageal disease on preoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Sleeve gastrectomy is currently one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures worldwide because of its effectiveness for weight loss and improvement of obesity-related diseases. However, increasing evidence suggests that sleeve gastrectomy may also increase the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease and reflux-related esophageal injury during long-term follow-up. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported substantial rates of postoperative reflux symptoms, erosive esophagitis, proton pump inhibitor use, and de novo Barrett's esophagus after sleeve gastrectomy. Importantly, clinically significant esophageal disease may develop also in participants with mild symptoms or in those without typical reflux complaints.

Recent international guidelines and position statements from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) recommend upper gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation and postoperative surveillance after sleeve gastrectomy because of the risk of reflux-related esophageal disease, including erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus.

However, systematic endoscopic surveillance after sleeve gastrectomy may be difficult to implement in all participants because upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is invasive, resource-intensive, and not always well tolerated. In addition, reflux symptoms alone may not reliably identify participants with clinically significant esophageal disease. For this reason, there is increasing interest in developing noninvasive biomarkers capable of identifying participants at increased risk of reflux-related esophageal injury after sleeve gastrectomy.

The mechanisms responsible for reflux after sleeve gastrectomy are likely multifactorial. Sleeve gastrectomy produces major anatomical and physiological changes in the upper gastrointestinal tract that may favor reflux of gastric and duodenal contents into the esophagus. Proposed mechanisms include increased intragastric pressure due to reduced gastric volume and compliance, disruption of the angle of His, altered esophagogastric junction anatomy, possible impairment of lower esophageal sphincter function, delayed gastric emptying in some participants, and the development or progression of hiatal hernia. Together, these changes may promote both acid reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux.

In addition to gastric acid exposure, reflux after sleeve gastrectomy may contain bile acids originating from the duodenum. Several studies have shown that mixed reflux containing gastric and biliary contents may produce greater esophageal mucosal injury than acid reflux alone. Bile acids remain biologically active in weakly acidic environments and may therefore contribute to esophageal injury even when acid exposure is partially controlled.

Experimental and translational studies have demonstrated that bile acids may play an important role in the pathophysiology of reflux-related esophageal disease. Hydrophobic bile acids such as deoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid have been associated with oxidative stress, DNA damage, epithelial barrier dysfunction, inflammatory signaling activation, and cellular changes related to Barrett's metaplasia. Exposure to bile acids may impair epithelial integrity by altering intercellular junctions and increasing mucosal permeability. Chronic exposure to mixed acid and bile reflux has also been linked to molecular pathways involved in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma development.

Because reflux-related esophageal injury may be asymptomatic, saliva has emerged as a promising biological fluid for reflux biomarker research. Reflux components may reach the oral cavity and be measured using sensitive laboratory techniques. Previous studies have demonstrated that bile acids can be identified and quantified in saliva using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry methods. Salivary bile acid concentrations have been reported to be higher in participants with reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus compared with controls. Specific bile acid profiles, particularly conjugated bile acids, have also been associated with more severe reflux-related disease.

Salivary pepsin has also been investigated as a noninvasive marker of reflux disease. Several studies have shown associations between salivary pepsin concentration and erosive esophagitis, reflux symptoms, and Barrett's esophagus. A prospective studiy performed after sleeve gastrectomy suggested that pepsin levels may be higher in participants with endoscopic erosive esophagitis.

Despite these findings, the role of salivary bile acids and pepsin as biomarkers of reflux-related esophageal disease after sleeve gastrectomy remains insufficiently studied. The ABSORB study was designed as a pilot proof-of-concept study to evaluate whether salivary biomarkers may help identify participants at increased risk of clinically significant postoperative esophageal disease, particularly Los Angeles grade B-D erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus. The long-term objective of this research approach is to explore whether salivary bile acids and pepsin could eventually contribute to a noninvasive risk-stratification strategy capable of reducing the need for systematic postoperative endoscopic surveillance in lower-risk participants.

Participants will be evaluated before surgery and during postoperative follow-up at 12 and 36 months. Participants will therefore serve as their own comparison group over time. At each time point, fasting and post-meal saliva samples will be collected using a standardized collection protocol.

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is not performed as an experimental intervention in this study. Preoperative and postoperative endoscopies are part of the usual clinical follow-up protocol for people undergoing sleeve gastrectomy at the participating centers. Histologic samples will only be obtained when clinically indicated according to endoscopic findings.

Saliva samples will be processed and stored under controlled conditions. Bile acids will be analyzed using chromatography-mass spectrometry methods, and pepsin will be analyzed using immunologic methods. The study will evaluate total bile acid concentration, selected individual bile acids, pepsin concentration, and their changes over time.

Clinical, endoscopic, symptom, treatment, and laboratory data will be recorded in a secure electronic database using coded participant identifiers. The study will use standardized procedures for participant recruitment, saliva collection, sample labeling, sample storage, transport to the reference laboratory, and data entry. Data quality procedures will include predefined validation rules, review of missing or inconsistent data, and verification of key variables against clinical source records when needed.

This pilot study is intended to generate preliminary evidence on the potential role of salivary bile acids and pepsin as biomarkers of reflux-related esophageal disease after sleeve gastrectomy. The results may help define candidate biomarker thresholds, support future multicenter validation studies, and contribute to the development of noninvasive postoperative surveillance strategies after sleeve gastrectomy.