此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

The Effects of Somatic-Based Chair Exercises in the Elderly

2026年5月25日 更新者:İlkay Tuğçe Köse、Istanbul Gedik University

The Effects of Somatic-Based Chair Exercises on Balance, Pain, and Quality of Life in the Elderly

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effects of easily applicable somatic-based chair exercises on balance and pain in the elderly. Additionally, the study aims to reveal the impact of exercise on functionality and cognitive level, and the resulting changes in quality of life.

The main research questions addressed in this study are:

  • What are the most suitable exercise models that can be applied to improve pain control and balance in the elderly?
  • How do the results of different approaches aimed at improving the quality of life in the elderly differ?

研究概览

详细说明

Somatic education refers to a process of sensory-motor learning that enables individuals to develop greater conscious control over their physiological functions. In this study, Thomas Hanna's definition of somatics and Hanna Somatic Education will be used. Thomas Hanna (1976) introduced the term "somatics" to describe the discipline of movement reeducation (somatic education/somatic movement), which aims to promote inner awareness of an individual's body. The practice of somatic movement involves pandiculation. Pandiculation is a process that starts with deliberate muscle activation and transitions into a slow and controlled eccentric release. This is done with ongoing sensory focus, and the movements remain gentle, unforced, and require little effort.

The study design involves comparing the effects of structured somatic-based chair exercises with the effects of a conventional exercise method consisting of basic range of motion exercises combined with static stretching.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

70

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 65 years of age or older
  2. To be volunteered to participate
  3. To be able to speak and understand Turkish at a good level

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Scoring <24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination
  2. Any neurological or orthopedic problem that would prevent the implementation of assessment and exercise methods

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Somatic-based Chair Exercise Group
This group will participate in a structured somatic-based chair exercise program. The program will last for 8 weeks, with sessions held twice a week, each lasting 35 to 40 minutes.
The intervention includes a structured somatic-based chair exercise program (SSCE) developed in accordance with Thomas Hanna's somatic education approach. The program consists of gentle, slow, and controlled movements incorporating pandiculation techniques to improve body awareness and movement control. Exercises target multiple body regions, including the neck, trunk, pelvis, shoulders, upper and lower extremities, wrists, hips, and ankles. Sessions will be performed twice weekly for 8 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 35-40 minutes. A total of 35 volunteers will be enrolled in the SSCE.
其他名称:
  • Structured Somatic-Based Chair Exercises
  • SSCE
有源比较器:Conventional Exercise Group
The conventional exercise group will participate in a program that combines static stretching and range of motion (ROM) exercises. The exercise program will last for 8 weeks, with sessions held twice a week, each lasting 35 to 40 minutes.
A total of 35 volunteers will be enrolled in the conventional exercise program, which combines range of motion (ROM) exercises and passive stretching of the same body regions and muscle groups as those addressed in the somatic exercise group.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Pain Assessment
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Pain will be assessed via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). BPI measures two objectives: the subjective severity of pain and the causal effect of pain. The questions include numerical rating scales from 0 to 10 (0: none; 1-4: mild; 5-6: moderate, and 7-10: severe).
1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Balance Ability Assessment
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

Balance ability will be assessed by using the Berg Balance Test (BBT).

The BBT measures balance ability (static and dynamic) among older adults. It is a qualitative measure that assesses balance by performing functional activities such as reaching, bending, transferring, and standing, including most components of postural control. The test contains 14 items. A higher score indicates better balance and a lower risk of falling.

1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Objective Balance Assessment via Becure Balance System
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Objective balance performance will be assessed using the Becure Balance System. The system utilizes the Nintendo WiiFit balance board integrated with computer-based software to evaluate static standing balance, center of gravity distribution, and postural oscillations. The validity and reliability of the system have previously been established.
1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Cognitive Assessment
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) will be used to assess changes in cognitive levels after the exercise program. The scale is scored between 0 and 30, and includes 6 cognitive functions (memory, visual-spatial skills, executive functions, attention, concentration and working memory tasks, language, and orientation). Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Quality of Life Assessment
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
The Quality of Life Scale in the Elderly (CASP-19) will be used to determine changes in the volunteers' quality of life after the exercise program. CASP-19 consists of 19 items and 4 sub-dimensions as 'Control', 'Autonomy', 'Enjoyment', and 'Self-actualization'. Each item of the scale is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3). Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life and well-being in older adults.
1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Assessment of Mobility
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) will be used to assess mobility along with fall risk. TUG correlates well with balance, gait speed, and functional capacity.

In this test, participants are instructed to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters at a comfortable, safe pace, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.

The total time required to complete the task is recorded in seconds. Shorter completion times indicate better functional mobility and dynamic balance, whereas longer times indicate poorer mobility and increased fall risk.

1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Upper Extremity Muscle Strength Assessment
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

The Weight Lifting Test (Arm Curl Test) will be used to assess upper extremity muscle strength. Participants perform as many arm curls as possible within 30 seconds while holding a standardized weight [5 lbs (2.3 kg) for women and 8 lbs (3.6 kg) for men].

Higher repetition counts indicate better upper extremity muscle strength.

1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Upper Extremity Flexibility Assessment
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Upper extremity flexibility will be assessed using the Back Scratch Test (Apley Scratch Test). The test measures the distance between or the overlap of the middle fingers behind the back. An overlap between the fingers is recorded as a positive value, whereas a gap between the fingers is recorded as a negative value. Higher positive values indicate better upper extremity flexibility.
1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Lower Extremity Muscle Strength Assessment
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Lower extremity muscle strength will be assessed using the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test. Participants perform as many sit-to-stand repetitions as possible within 30 seconds. Higher repetition counts indicate better lower extremity muscle strength.
1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Lower Extremity Flexibility Assessment
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)
Lower extremity flexibility will be assessed using the Chair Sit-and-Reach Test. The test measures the distance between the fingertips and toes while reaching toward the foot from a seated position. The distance between the fingertips and the toes is measured in centimeters. Reaching beyond the toes is recorded as a positive value, whereas the inability to reach the toes is recorded as a negative value. Higher positive values indicate better lower extremity flexibility.
1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
大体时间:1 week before the study (T0)

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to identify the volunteers to be included in the study, as volunteers scoring 24-point or higher on the MMSE will be included in the study.

The MMSE is a 30-point questionnaire commonly used to evaluate cognitive function, including orientation, attention, memory, language, and visuospatial skills. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.

1 week before the study (T0)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

合作者

调查人员

  • 研究主任:Pınar Kaya Sarıbaş, Assoc. Prof.、Medipol University
  • 首席研究员:İlkay Tuğçe Köse, M.Sc.、Istanbul Gedik University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年6月25日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年6月25日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年9月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月5日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月25日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月1日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月25日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • IGUN-ITKOSE-001

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅