此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Self-directed Mobile Mindfulness to Address ICU Survivors' Psychological Distress (Lift 3)

2026年7月7日 更新者：Duke University

Self-directed Mobile Mindfulness to Address ICU Survivors' Psychological Distress: Lift RCT (Lift 3)

Serious acute heart and lung illnesses like heart failure, severe COVID, and sepsis often leave survivors struggling not only physically, but also with lasting depression, anxiety, and stress. These problems that are hard to treat because access to mental health care is often limited. To help address this, the researchers created Lift, a fully automated mindfulness program designed with patient input and delivered through a mobile app. The investigators now plan a large, multi-site study to test whether Lift improves mental health and quality of life over six months compared to a critical illness education program called Enlighten Recovery. Overall the goal is to make an easy-to-use, widely accessible program available to people across the U.S., including those who speak Spanish.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Cardiorespiratory conditions such as the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), congestive heart failure, COVID pneumonia, and sepsis are among the most common causes of mortality and morbidity. They are also notable for high rates of persistent psychological distress symptoms including depression, anxiety, and PTSD that worsen quality of life and outcomes of the underlying conditions. Yet there are few effective strategies able to overcome barriers of limited access to mental health care.

To address this gap, the researchers developed Lift, a completely automated and self-directed mindfulness training intervention, from the ground up with patient input. First, Lift reduced depression symptoms and improved quality of life compared to an education program control in a multicenter pilot RCT (R34 AT008819) among those recently hospitalized with serious cardiorespiratory conditions. Next, a 247-person multicenter 2x2x2 factorial optimization trial (U01 AT00974) compared 8 intervention versions differing by program introduction (app vs. therapist), dose (standard vs. high), and approach to in-the-moment symptom management (app vs. therapist). This trial demonstrated that while all versions had a strong effect on depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms, the high dose, app-only version was optimized for effect, adherence, and retention.

Given these promising findings, a formal test of the optimized Lift mobile mindfulness intervention's efficacy is needed. Therefore, the investigators propose a 4-site multicenter RCT with 6-month follow up among 450 cardiorespiratory failure survivors with elevated post-discharge symptoms of psychological distress. The specific aims will: (1) Test Lift vs. an education program control delivered by similar platforms on symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and quality of life; (2a) Determine patient-level characteristics associated with a greater treatment response among a priori-defined subgroups using a heterogeneity of treatment effects analysis; (2b) Explore novel adherence metrics and outcomes; and (3) Ensure off-the-shelf intervention readiness with an exploratory mixed-methods hybrid type 1 implementation framework analysis that integrates quantitative trial implementation data with semi-structured trial participant interviews.

Innovative and unique elements include a fully automated mobile health delivery system that personalizes content in response to changes in symptom trajectories, the inclusion of Spanish language versions of intervention and control programs, and strong community engagement with formalized roles. This project addresses national research priorities and could advance the field with a personalizable yet population-scalable therapy that has the potential to broadly improve mental health access.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

450

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

  • 美国
    • California
      • Los Angeles、California、美国、90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
        • 接触：
        • 首席研究员：
          • Matthew Modes, MD
    • North Carolina
      • Durham、North Carolina、美国、27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston、South Carolina、美国、29403
        • Medical University of South Carolina

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria present during hospitalization

  1. Adult (age ≥18)
  2. Managed in an ICU for ≥24 hours during the time inclusion criterion #3 is met

  3. Serious acute cardiorespiratory condition, defined as ≥1 of the following:

    • mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube for ≥4 hours
    • non-invasive ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP) for ≥4 hours in a 24-hour period provided for acute respiratory failure
    • new use of supplemental oxygen ≥6 liters per minute (or increase in baseline continuous oxygen)
    • use of vasopressors for shock of any etiology
    • use of inotropes for shock of any etiology
    • use of pulmonary vasodilators
    • use of aortic balloon pump or cardiac assist device for cardiogenic shock
    • use of diuretic intravenous drip
    • evidence of acute coronary ischemia (i.e., elevated troponin level, supporting EKG changes, unstable angina symptoms documented)
    • urgent cardiac catheterization

  4. Cognitive status intact

    o No history of pre-existing significant cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia) as per medical chart

  5. Absence of severe and/or persistent mental illness

    o Treatment for severe and/or persistent mental illness (e.g., psychosis, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizoid personality disorder, schizophrenia [as per medical record], hospitalization for any psychiatric disorder) within the 6 months preceding the current hospital admission

  6. Functional fluency in English or Spanish (i.e., sufficient knowledge of English or Spanish to complete study tasks like watch videos, complete surveys)

Inclusion criteria present after hospital discharge (i.e., at the time of arrival home after discharge from the hospital):

1. Elevated baseline psychological distress symptoms, defined as a PHQ-9 score ≥5

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria present in the hospital:

1. Discharged to a location other than a home setting (e.g., nursing home, long-term acute care facility, inpatient rehabilitation facility)

Exclusion criteria present after hospital discharge (i.e., at T1 Data Collection conducted at the time of arrival home from the hospital):

  1. Severe psychological distress as assessed by endorsement of active suicidality (see Protection of Human Subjects document for study team management of this finding)
  2. Failure to randomize within 1 month after discharge from the hospital to home
  3. Failure to login to study app and access content within 2 weeks after randomization

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：支持治疗
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：三倍

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：Lift mobile mindfulness
Mobile app-based mindfulness program
行为的：Lift mobile mindfulness
Mobile app-based mindfulness program for serious illness survivors
有源比较器：Enlighten Recovery education program
Mobile app-based critical illness education program
行为的：Enlighten Recovery education program
Mobile app-based critical illness education program for serious illness survivors

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9)
大体时间：Baseline to 1 month
The PHQ-9 is a primary trial outcome measure and the PHQ-9 score at 1 month is the primary trial outcome (Kroenke K, et al. J Gen Intern Med 606-13, 2001). The PHQ-9 is a well-validated metric with English and Spanish versions used in thousands of RCTs. Scores can range from 0 (no depression symptoms) to 27 (serious depression symptoms). The PHQ-9 MCID is 2-4 units.
Baseline to 1 month

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)
大体时间：Baseline to 3 months
The GAD-7, like the related PHQ-9, has excellent psychodynamic properties including reliability, test-retest stability, accuracy, responsiveness, and validity as supported by confirmatory factor analysis (Spitzer RL, et al. Arch Intern Med. 166:1092-1097, 2006). GAD-7 scores can range from 0 [no distress] to 21 [high distress]); symptom severity is interpreted as mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), and severe (15-21). The GAD-7 MCID is 2-4 units.
Baseline to 3 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)
大体时间：Baseline to 6 months
The GAD-7, like the related PHQ-9, has excellent psychodynamic properties including reliability, test-retest stability, accuracy, responsiveness, and validity as supported by confirmatory factor analysis (Spitzer RL, et al. Arch Intern Med. 166:1092-1097, 2006). GAD-7 scores can range from 0 [no distress] to 21 [high distress]); symptom severity is interpreted as mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), and severe (15-21). The GAD-7 MCID is 2-4 units.
Baseline to 6 months
The Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome inventory (PTSS)
大体时间：Baseline to 1 month
The PTSS rates 10 post-traumatic stress symptoms (range 10 [no symptoms] to 70 [high burden of symptoms]). A score >20 represents clinically important PTSD symptoms, while a score >=34 suggests likely PTSD.(Nickel M, et al. J Int Care Med. 19:285-290, 2004; Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) Compared to DSM-IV criteria, it is 98% specific and 77% sensitive for the diagnosis of PTSD among ICU survivors.(Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) The PTSS has excellent internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness. (Schelling G, et al. Crit Care Med. 26:651-659, 1998; Twigg E, et al. Acta Anaesth Scand. 52:202-208, 2008) Furthermore, it is short and easily understood. Although formal psychometric testing has not clearly defined the PTSS's minimal clinically important difference, a 5-unit change represents a significant change in score in a single item and will therefore be used as a benchmark for this project.
Baseline to 1 month
The Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome inventory (PTSS)
大体时间：Baseline to 3 months
The PTSS rates 10 post-traumatic stress symptoms (range 10 [no symptoms] to 70 [high burden of symptoms]). A score >20 represents clinically important PTSD symptoms, while a score >=34 suggests likely PTSD.(Nickel M, et al. J Int Care Med. 19:285-290, 2004; Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) Compared to DSM-IV criteria, it is 98% specific and 77% sensitive for the diagnosis of PTSD among ICU survivors.(Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) The PTSS has excellent internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness. (Schelling G, et al. Crit Care Med. 26:651-659, 1998; Twigg E, et al. Acta Anaesth Scand. 52:202-208, 2008) Furthermore, it is short and easily understood. Although formal psychometric testing has not clearly defined the PTSS's minimal clinically important difference, a 5-unit change represents a significant change in score in a single item and will therefore be used as a benchmark for this project.
Baseline to 3 months
The Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome inventory (PTSS)
大体时间：Baseline to 6 months
The PTSS rates 10 post-traumatic stress symptoms (range 10 [no symptoms] to 70 [high burden of symptoms]). A score >20 represents clinically important PTSD symptoms, while a score >=34 suggests likely PTSD.(Nickel M, et al. J Int Care Med. 19:285-290, 2004; Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) Compared to DSM-IV criteria, it is 98% specific and 77% sensitive for the diagnosis of PTSD among ICU survivors.(Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) The PTSS has excellent internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness. (Schelling G, et al. Crit Care Med. 26:651-659, 1998; Twigg E, et al. Acta Anaesth Scand. 52:202-208, 2008) Furthermore, it is short and easily understood. Although formal psychometric testing has not clearly defined the PTSS's minimal clinically important difference, a 5-unit change represents a significant change in score in a single item and will therefore be used as a benchmark for this project.
Baseline to 6 months
The EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D)
大体时间：Baseline to 1 month
The EQ-5D is an easily understood, validated 5-item (plus a 100-point visual analog scale) quality of life measure that has been used successfully in >100 ICU survivor studies.(EuroQOL group. Health Policy. 16:199-208, 1990; Unroe M, et al. Ann Int Med. 153:167-175, 2010) It is considered a Core Measure for ICU outcomes research.
Baseline to 1 month
The EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D)
大体时间：Baseline to 3 months
The EQ-5D is an easily understood, validated 5-item (plus a 100-point visual analog scale) quality of life measure that has been used successfully in >100 ICU survivor studies.(EuroQOL group. Health Policy. 16:199-208, 1990; Unroe M, et al. Ann Int Med. 153:167-175, 2010) It is considered a Core Measure for ICU outcomes research.
Baseline to 3 months
The EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D)
大体时间：Baseline to 6 months
The EQ-5D is an easily understood, validated 5-item (plus a 100-point visual analog scale) quality of life measure that has been used successfully in >100 ICU survivor studies.(EuroQOL group. Health Policy. 16:199-208, 1990; Unroe M, et al. Ann Int Med. 153:167-175, 2010) It is considered a Core Measure for ICU outcomes research.
Baseline to 6 months
The Patient Health Questionnaire 10-Item scale (PHQ-10)
大体时间：Baseline to 1 month
The investigators will use the PHQ-10, which is an adaptation of the PHQ-15 (Kroenke K, et a. Psychosom Med. 64:258-66, 2002), a scale they have used successfully in past work, to assess physical symptoms across 10 domains. The PHQ-15 is reliable, responsive, and easily understood. The study team's PHQ-10 adaptation collapsed several pain items into a single item based on patient feedback. The scale is from 0 to 30.
Baseline to 1 month
The Patient Health Questionnaire 10-Item scale (PHQ-10)
大体时间：Baseline to 3 months
The investigators will use the PHQ-10, which is an adaptation of the PHQ-15 (Kroenke K, et a. Psychosom Med. 64:258-66, 2002), a scale they have used successfully in past work, to assess physical symptoms across 10 domains. The PHQ-15 is reliable, responsive, and easily understood. The study team's PHQ-10 adaptation collapsed several pain items into a single item based on patient feedback. The scale is from 0 to 30.
Baseline to 3 months
The Patient Health Questionnaire 10-Item scale (PHQ-10)
大体时间：Baseline to 6 months
The investigators will use the PHQ-10, which is an adaptation of the PHQ-15 (Kroenke K, et a. Psychosom Med. 64:258-66, 2002), a scale they have used successfully in past work, to assess physical symptoms across 10 domains. The PHQ-15 is reliable, responsive, and easily understood. The study team's PHQ-10 adaptation collapsed several pain items into a single item based on patient feedback. The scale is from 0 to 30, with higher scores meaning more functional issues.
Baseline to 6 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Duke University

合作者

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Christopher Cox, MD, MHA, MPH、Duke University

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2027年1月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2031年2月28日

研究完成 (估计的)

2031年5月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月1日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月1日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月8日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月8日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月7日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • Pro00118118
  • 1UG3AT013109-01 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅