此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Two-component Radiology-guided Autonomous Cascade Engine (TRACE) (TRACE)

2026年6月11日 更新者：Guoliang Zheng、Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute

Protocol for a Prospective Randomised Crossover Controlled Trial of the Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Decision-Making System for Gastric Cancer T-Staging (TRACE)

This study employed a prospective, randomised crossover trial design to evaluate the clinical utility of the TRACE artificial intelligence system for gastric cancer T-staging. A total of 54 radiologists from tertiary and non-tertiary hospitals, including both senior and junior practitioners, were enrolled. The study aimed to investigate whether AI-assisted diagnosis could improve the diagnostic accuracy of gastric cancer T-staging compared with independent interpretation by radiologists.

All participants were required to interpret 60 contrast-enhanced CT cases sequentially, completing two readings for each case: one without AI assistance and one with AI assistance; The order of the two readings was randomised, and a one-month washout period was observed between readings to eliminate memory bias. All cases were pathologically confirmed gastric cancer cases (stages T1-T4b), and the study simultaneously recorded the physicians' T-staging diagnostic results and the time taken per case. The 60 cases per radiologist were randomly selected from a pool of 1,000 histologically confirmed gastric cancer cases, stratified by pathological T stage T1-T4b. The reference standard was postoperative pathological T stage. The primary outcome was the change in T-staging accuracy between AI-assisted reading and standard (unaided) reading.The term "prospective" in this study refers to the prospective execution of radiologist enrollment, randomization, reading procedures, and data collection.

研究概览

地位

招聘中

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

The TRACE trial is a prospective, randomized, crossover, controlled study evaluating an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision system for T staging of gastric cancer based on CT images.

Background and rationale: Accurate preoperative T staging is critical for treatment planning in gastric cancer, but remains challenging due to reader variability and imaging limitations. The AI system was developed using deep learning with a large multi-center dataset to improve staging accuracy.

Study design: Eligible patients with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer will undergo preoperative contrast-enhanced CT. Each participant will be assessed twice in random order: once with AI assistance (AI arm) and once without (standard arm). A washout period will be applied between the two readings to minimize recall bias. Radiologists involved in the study are blinded to clinical and pathological reference standards.

Objective: To compare the T staging accuracy (primary outcome) between AI-assisted and standard reading, with secondary outcomes including inter-reader agreement, reading time, and diagnostic confidence.

Statistical methods: A crossover design will be used with a sample size calculated to detect a prespecified difference in overall accuracy. The primary analysis will employ a paired McNemar test or generalized estimating equation accounting for period and carryover effects. Subgroup analyses by tumor location, T category, and reader experience will be exploratory.

Data monitoring: No independent Data Monitoring Committee is required due to the low-risk nature of the diagnostic device. Adverse events related to the use of the software (e.g., workflow disruption) will be recorded and reported.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute. Written informed consent (online or paper-based) will be obtained from all participants. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals regardless of outcome.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

54

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

  • 中国
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang、Liaoning、中国、110024
        • 招聘中
        • Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute)
        • 接触：

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria (Imaging Data)

  1. Contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) images of gastric cancer patients from the Liaoning Cancer Hospital;
  2. Patients with a definitive postoperative pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer and a clear T-stage classification (T1-T4, including T4a and T4b);
  3. Imaging data must be complete and of sufficient quality to meet diagnostic and analytical requirements, with no significant artefacts or missing key data;
  4. Complete clinical and pathological information must be available to establish a diagnostic gold standard for comparison.

Physician Inclusion Criteria (Image Readers)

  1. Radiologists holding a valid medical licence;
  2. From the radiology department of a Grade A tertiary hospital or a non-Grade A tertiary hospital;
  3. Classified as senior or junior physicians based on clinical experience;
  4. Voluntarily participating in this study and completing both the non-AI-assisted and AI-assisted image interpretation tasks.

Case Exclusion Criteria

  1. Severe missing imaging data or quality failing to meet analysis requirements (e.g., severe motion artefacts);
  2. Lack of clear postoperative pathological T-staging results;
  3. Cases not involving gastric cancer or with incomplete pathological information;
  4. Cases of duplicate enrolment or inconsistent data recording.

Physician Exclusion Criteria

  1. Those unable to complete all image review tasks or demonstrating severe non-compliance;
  2. Those who withdraw during the study period and are unable to provide complete data for both phases of image review;
  3. Those who fail to complete the AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted interpretation processes as specified.

Withdrawal Criteria

  1. Physicians who voluntarily withdraw from the study for personal reasons (e.g., time, health or work commitments);
  2. Physicians who fail to complete the required image review tasks or have data missing in excess of the specified threshold;
  3. Cases where critical data errors are identified during subsequent verification or where pathological results cannot be traced; Data found during the study to be non-compliant with ethical or quality control requirements must be excluded.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：诊断
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：交叉作业
  • 屏蔽：双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：Standard reading 1
Utilizing the TRACE model to assist radiologists in T-staging. In this arm, participants receive TRACE model assistance in the first reading phase (AI-assisted), followed by independent reading without AI after a 1-month washout period. The temporal order of the intervention is early application.
诊断测试：Utilizing the TRACE model to assist radiologists in T-staging
AI-assisted reading: Radiologists interpret preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images for gastric cancer T staging with the support of the TRACE artificial intelligence decision system. The AI system provides a suggested T stage and relevant imaging features. The radiologist makes the final staging decision after reviewing the AI output. This intervention is used only during the AI-assisted reading session.
其他：washout period
Participants are required to observe a washout period of at least 30 days between consecutive interventions/assessments.
实验性的：Standard Reading 2
Utilizing the TRACE model to assist radiologists in T-staging. In this arm, participants first perform independent reading without AI assistance, and after a 1-month washout period, they receive TRACE model assistance in the second reading phase. The temporal order of the same intervention is delayed compared to Arm 1.
诊断测试：Utilizing the TRACE model to assist radiologists in T-staging
AI-assisted reading: Radiologists interpret preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images for gastric cancer T staging with the support of the TRACE artificial intelligence decision system. The AI system provides a suggested T stage and relevant imaging features. The radiologist makes the final staging decision after reviewing the AI output. This intervention is used only during the AI-assisted reading session.
其他：washout period
Participants are required to observe a washout period of at least 30 days between consecutive interventions/assessments.

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Accuracy
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Accuracy of radiologists' interpretation of T staging
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Accuracy Change by Physician Experience Level
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Changes in diagnostic accuracy of radiologists with different experience levels before and after AI assistance.
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Stratified diagnostic accuracy of different T-stages
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Stratified diagnostic accuracy for different T-stages (T1-T4, including T4a and T4b).
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Agreement between physician diagnosis and pathological gold standard
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Agreement between radiologists' diagnostic results and the pathological gold standard (e.g., Kappa value).
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Agreement between AI model and physician interpretation
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Agreement analysis between AI model prediction results and radiologists' interpretations.
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Effect of AI assistance on reading efficiency
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Changes in average reading time for diagnosis with and without AI assistance.
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Influence of case characteristics on AI assistance effect
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Influence of different case characteristics (e.g., tumor location, size) on the performance of AI assistance.
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Impact of individual physician differences on AI assistance effect
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Impact of individual differences among physicians on the performance of AI assistance.
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Value of AI assistance in reducing diagnostic discrepancy
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Potential value of AI assistance in reducing diagnostic differences and improving reading agreement.
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Impact of model probability information on physician decisions
大体时间：Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.
Preliminary analysis of the impact of probability output from AI model on physician decision-making behavior.
Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Guoliang Zheng、Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute)

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年6月18日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年7月25日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年8月7日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月11日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月11日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月16日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月16日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月11日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • KY20260512

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

IPD 计划说明

Due to the restrictions imposed by the ethics committee and the institutional review board regarding the protection of patient privacy, individual participant data will not be shared.

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅