Effect of Pecha Kucha-Based Normal Birth Education on Birth Beliefs and Birth Preferences Among Pregnant Women Considering Elective Cesarean Section
Effect of Pecha Kucha-Based Normal Birth Education on Birth Beliefs and Mode of Birth Preferences Among Pregnant Women Considering Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
研究概览
地位
详细说明
Background Cesarean section rates have increased substantially worldwide and represent an important public health concern. In addition to medical indications, maternal preference has emerged as a contributing factor to elective cesarean section. Women's beliefs about childbirth are known to influence their delivery preferences. Belief in birth as a natural process is associated with viewing childbirth as a normal and safe physiological event, whereas belief in birth as a medical process is associated with perceiving childbirth as potentially dangerous and requiring medical intervention. Prenatal education provided by healthcare professionals may influence these beliefs and subsequently affect women's birth preferences.
Pecha Kucha is a structured presentation technique consisting of 20 slides displayed for 20 seconds each, resulting in a total presentation time of 6 minutes and 40 seconds. The method emphasizes concise communication through visual materials and has been reported to facilitate attention, comprehension, and retention of information. Although the Pecha Kucha technique has been used in various health education settings, evidence regarding its effectiveness in antenatal education is limited.
Objective The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Pecha Kucha-based normal birth education on birth beliefs and mode of birth preferences among pregnant women considering elective cesarean section.
Study Design This study was conducted as a single-blind, randomized controlled trial between March 2025 and June 2025 in Family Health Centers affiliated with a district Health Directorate in southern Türkiye. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group using a simple randomization method. Women who met the eligibility criteria were allocated by drawing numbered papers from a box.
Participants The study included primiparous pregnant women who were at least 20 years of age, between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation, considering elective cesarean section without a medical indication, able to read and speak Turkish, and willing to participate. Women with maternal or fetal conditions requiring cesarean delivery and those who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. A total of 76 participants completed the study, including 38 women in the experimental group and 38 women in the control group.
Interventions Both groups received education based on the Ministry of Health's Motherhood Journey Guide. Educational content included preparation for childbirth, birth planning, physiology and stages of labor, maternal and fetal changes during childbirth, coping with labor pain, breathing and relaxation techniques, movement and positioning during labor, benefits of vaginal birth, indications and risks of cesarean section, management of childbirth-related fears and anxieties, partner and family support, skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding initiation, postpartum care, and common misconceptions regarding childbirth.
Participants in the experimental group received the educational content through the Pecha Kucha presentation technique. The presentation consisted of 20 visually supported slides presented for 20 seconds each. Participants in the control group received the same content through a conventional face-to-face oral presentation. Following the educational sessions, participants were given the opportunity to ask questions and receive feedback.
Outcome Assessment Data were collected at three time points: before the intervention (baseline), immediately after the intervention, and one month after the intervention. Outcome measures included the Birth Beliefs Scale and the Pregnant Women's Birth Mode Preferences Scale. The Birth Beliefs Scale evaluated beliefs regarding childbirth as a natural process and as a medical process. The Pregnant Women's Birth Mode Preferences Scale assessed preferences regarding vaginal birth and cesarean delivery.
Study Hypothesis The investigators hypothesized that normal birth education delivered through the Pecha Kucha technique would increase belief in childbirth as a natural process, decrease belief in childbirth as a medical process, and strengthen preferences for vaginal birth among pregnant women considering elective cesarean section.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Bucak
-
Burdur、Bucak、土耳其(türkiye)
- Bucak Health School
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Female pregnant women aged 20 years or older. Primiparous. Between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation. Considering elective cesarean section. No maternal or fetal medical indication requiring cesarean delivery. Able to read, write, and speak Turkish. Willing to participate in the study and provide informed consent. Available to complete all study assessments throughout the study period.
Exclusion Criteria:
Younger than 20 years of age. Multiparous women. Presence of a maternal or fetal medical indication requiring cesarean delivery. Hearing or visual impairment that could interfere with participation in the educational intervention.
Inability to read, write, or speak Turkish. Refusal to participate or withdrawal of consent during the study. Failure to complete study procedures or follow-up assessments.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:预防
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Pecha Kucha-Based Normal Birth Education
Pregnant women received normal birth education delivered using the Pecha Kucha presentation technique.
The education consisted of 20 visually supported slides presented for 20 seconds each and included information on preparation for childbirth, birth planning, physiology and stages of labor, coping with labor pain, breathing and relaxation techniques, benefits of vaginal birth, indications and risks of cesarean section, partner support, breastfeeding initiation, postpartum care, and common misconceptions about childbirth.
Participants completed outcome assessments at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and one month after the intervention.
|
A structured face-to-face educational intervention delivered using the Pecha Kucha presentation format consisting of 20 slides displayed for 20 seconds each.
The intervention was designed to provide evidence-based information about normal birth and cesarean section through concise, visually supported content.
|
|
有源比较器:Traditional Normal Birth Education
Pregnant women received the same normal birth educational content through a conventional face-to-face oral presentation.
Educational topics were identical to those provided in the experimental group.
Outcome assessments were completed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and one month after the intervention.
|
Face-to-face education delivered using a conventional oral presentation method.
The educational content was identical to that provided in the experimental group but was delivered without the Pecha Kucha presentation format.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Birth Beliefs Scale - Natural Process Belief Subscale Score
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 1 month after the intervention.
|
The Natural Process Belief subscale of the Birth Beliefs Scale assesses the extent to which pregnant women perceive childbirth as a natural, normal, and safe physiological process.
Higher scores indicate stronger belief in childbirth as a natural process.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 1 month after the intervention.
|
|
Change in Birth Beliefs Scale - Medical Process Belief Subscale Score
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 1 month after the intervention.
|
The Medical Process Belief subscale of the Birth Beliefs Scale assesses the extent to which pregnant women perceive childbirth as a medical event requiring professional control and medical intervention.
Higher scores indicate stronger belief in childbirth as a medical process.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 1 month after the intervention.
|
|
Change in Pregnant Women's Birth Mode Preferences Scale Score
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 1 month after the intervention.
|
The Pregnant Women's Birth Mode Preferences Scale evaluates pregnant women's preferences regarding vaginal birth and cesarean delivery.
Total scores range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating a stronger preference for vaginal birth.
|
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 1 month after the intervention.
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Stoll KH, Hauck YL, Hall WA. Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students. Women Birth. 2016 Feb;29(1):e33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.07.187. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
- Weerasinghe K, Rishard M, Brabaharan S, Mohamed A. Effectiveness of face-to-face physiotherapy training and education for women who are undergoing elective caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Physiother. 2022 Feb 3;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00128-9.
- AbuAlRub SA, Hamdan F, Abu Baker M, Al Momani E, Etoom M, Hilwah L. Birth Mode Preferences and Associated Factors Among Jordanian Pregnant Women. SAGE Open Nurs. 2026 May 22;12:23779608261453437. doi: 10.1177/23779608261453437. eCollection 2026 Jan-Dec.
- Yilmaz NK, Evcili F. Validity and reliability of Turkish pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 May 27;70(6):e20231539. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231539. eCollection 2024.
- Zamani-Alavijeh F, Shahry P, Kalhori M, Araban M. Pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire: Psychometric properties. J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Apr 19;6:20. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.204738. eCollection 2017.
- Bicav Z, Unal Toprak F, Isbuga CC. The Effect of Antenatal Breastfeeding Education Delivered Through the Pecha Kucha Method on Postpartum Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy, Infant Feeding Attitudes, and Breastfeeding Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Hum Lact. 2026 Mar 6:8903344261419345. doi: 10.1177/08903344261419345. Online ahead of print.
- Bakir N, Gun Kakasci C, Demir C. The effect of training with the Pecha Kucha method on the attitudes of chronically ill women toward COVID-19 vaccination. Women Health. 2022 Oct-Dec;62(9-10):809-817. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2022.2146834. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
- Bahcecioglu Turan G, Karaaslan F, Ozer Z. The effects of nutrition education with Pecha Kucha method on prevention of malnutrition in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: a randomised controlled study. BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 22;25(1):1355. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14626-7.
- Oluic S, Milutinovic S, Gligorevic S, Brezic N, Correa BHM, Hassan M, Bartlett B, Labban ME, Wedzina W, Delibasic M, Oluic J, El-Din M. Pecha Kucha in medical education: a narrative literature review. Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Dec;37(4):491-502. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.358. Epub 2025 Nov 27.
- Kirca AS, Dagli E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of education given to midwifery students with The Pecha Kucha Method on climate change awareness: A randomized controlled experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Oct;153:106809. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106809. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
- Gun Kakasci C, Durmaz A. A creative and practical approach to postpartum discharge education: Pecha Kucha training via smart phone. Health Care Women Int. 2022 Dec;43(12):1482-1502. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2022.2043860. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
- Hay SJ, McLachlan HL, Newton M, Forster DA, Shafiei T. Sources of information during pregnancy and the early parenting period: Exploring the views of women and their partners. Midwifery. 2022 Feb;105:103236. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103236. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
- Camacho-Morell F, Esparcia J. Influence and use of information sources about childbearing among Spanish pregnant women. Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
- Coates D, Thirukumar P, Spear V, Brown G, Henry A. What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review. Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
- Lopez-Gimeno E, Seguranyes G, Vicente-Hernandez M, Burgos Cubero L, Vazquez Garreta G, Falguera-Puig G. Effectiveness of birth plan counselling based on shared decision making: A cluster randomized controlled trial (APLANT). PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274240. eCollection 2022.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- GO 2024/840
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.