此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Reliability and Reproducibility of CT-Based Facet Joint Measurements in Patients With AOSpine Type A2, A3, and A4 Thoracolumbar Fractures (REFACT)

2026年7月13日 更新者:Ivan Lvov, MD, PhD、Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care

The Reliability Evaluation of Facet joint Assessment by Computed Tomography in thoracolumbar fractures (REFACT) study aims to evaluate how consistently different specialists assess thoracolumbar facet joints on computed tomography (CT) images in patients with AOSpine type A2, A3, or A4 thoracolumbar fractures.

The main questions are:

  • How consistently do different raters classify facet joint degeneration using the Pathria grading system?
  • How consistently do different raters measure facet joint angle and mean facet joint space width on CT images?
  • How reproducible are these assessments when the same rater repeats the measurements after a one-month interval?

The study will use anonymized retrospective CT DICOM datasets obtained from the institutional imaging archive. Six independent raters (three neurosurgeons and three radiology specialists) will evaluate the same CT datasets using a standardized measurement protocol. Each rater will perform two independent assessment rounds separated by a one-month washout period. The results will be used to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of qualitative and quantitative CT-based facet joint assessment methods.

研究概览

详细说明

The Reliability Evaluation of Facet joint Assessment by Computed Tomography in thoracolumbar fractures (REFACT) study is an imaging-based, multirater reliability study designed to evaluate the reproducibility of computed tomography-based assessment of thoracolumbar facet joints.

The study represents the methodological stage of a broader research program investigating longitudinal degenerative changes in the facet joints after surgical or conservative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Before changes in facet joint morphology can be interpreted over time, the reliability of the imaging assessment methods must first be established in the target patient population.

Anonymized CT DICOM datasets will be selected from the institutional imaging archive of the Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine. The datasets will include patients with AOSpine type A2, A3, or A4 thoracolumbar junction fractures and will cover the anatomical levels required for standardized facet joint assessment. No additional imaging, patient contact, study-specific treatment, or prospective clinical intervention will be performed.

Six independent raters will participate in the study: three neurosurgeons and three specialists in radiology or CT imaging. All raters will use the same standardized assessment protocol and the same DICOM viewing software.

Before the formal assessment, the raters will participate in a joint training session using one representative anonymized CT dataset that will not be included in the main analysis. The session will be used to demonstrate the assessment procedure, standardize image orientation and vertebral level identification, clarify the interpretation of the Pathria grading system, and review the procedures for measuring facet joint angle and facet joint space width. Any ambiguities in the assessment instructions will be resolved before the formal study begins.

During the first assessment round, each rater will independently evaluate the same anonymized CT datasets. The order of the datasets will be randomized separately for each rater. Raters will record the Pathria grade of facet joint degeneration and quantitative facet joint measurements according to the standardized protocol.

After a one-month washout interval, the same CT datasets will be re-randomized and reassessed independently by the same six raters during a second assessment round. The changed order and washout period are intended to reduce recall bias and allow evaluation of the reproducibility of repeated assessments by the same rater.

Throughout both assessment rounds, raters will be blinded to patient identifiers, clinical information, previous measurements, and the assessments of the other raters. Raters will not discuss individual study cases or measurement decisions until both rounds have been completed.

The study will evaluate agreement across different raters and the consistency of repeated assessments by the same rater. The assessment will include both ordinal grading of facet joint degeneration and continuous morphometric measurements. Exploratory analyses may examine whether reliability differs according to rater specialty, vertebral level, or anatomical side.

All study data will be entered into a standardized data collection form and stored in a restricted-access institutional database. Missing, technically inadequate, or non-evaluable assessments will not be imputed and will be reported descriptively.

Because the study uses only previously acquired, anonymized imaging data, participants will not undergo any study-related procedures and will not be exposed to additional radiation or treatment-related risk.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

12

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

      • Moscow、俄罗斯、129090
        • Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine
        • 首席研究员:
          • Andrey Grin, MD, PhD
        • 接触:
          • Vasiliy Karanadze, MD, PhD
          • 电话号码:+7 (495) 280-15-61
          • 邮箱:sklif@zdrav.mos.ru
        • 副研究员:
          • Aleksandr Talypov, MD, PhD
        • 副研究员:
          • Anton Kordonsky, MD, PhD
        • 副研究员:
          • Vasily Karandze, MD, PhD
        • 副研究员:
          • Ivan Lvov, MD, PhD
        • 副研究员:
          • Mikhail Kucherov, MD
        • 副研究员:
          • Rinat Abdrafiev, MD
        • 副研究员:
          • Aleksandr Tupikin, MD
        • 副研究员:
          • Ksenia Dmitrenko, MD
        • 副研究员:
          • Maria Nanoyan, MD
        • 副研究员:
          • Olga Minkina, MD
        • 副研究员:
          • Layla Khamidova, MD, PhD
        • 副研究员:
          • Roman Elokhovskiy, MD, PhD

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

The study population will consist of patients aged 18 to 50 years with AOSpine type A2, A3, or A4 thoracolumbar fractures whose previously acquired CT examinations are available in the institutional imaging archive. Eligible CT datasets must cover vertebral levels T9 through L3 and be suitable for standardized facet joint assessment. The study will use anonymized retrospective imaging data only; there will be no direct patient recruitment, additional imaging, treatment allocation, or other study-specific intervention. CT datasets will be selected according to predefined eligibility criteria until at least 142 evaluable facet joints are available for analysis.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient age from 18 to 50 years;
  • thoracolumbar fracture classified as AOSpine type A2, A3, or A4;
  • availability of CT images covering vertebral levels from Th9 to L3;
  • absence of imaging artifacts at the levels planned for assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bone density of the thoracolumbar junction vertebrae below 100 HU;
  • systemic bone or joint disorders associated with changes in the FJs or intervertebral discs, including diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, or other comparable conditions;
  • previous spinal surgery, including procedures performed without implants;
  • fractures with distraction or translational injury of the posterior supporting column.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
CT Image Review Cohort
Anonymized CT scans of the thoracolumbar spine (T9-L3) obtained from eligible patients aged 18 to 65 years and reviewed independently by six raters to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility of CT-based evaluation of facet joint and intervertebral disc degenerative changes
Independent review of anonymized thoracolumbar CT scans by six raters for assessment of degenerative changes in facet joints and intervertebral discs using the Pathria scale, as well as measurement of facet joint space width and angulation.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Interobserver Reliability of CT-Based Pathria Grading Scale for Facet Joint Degenerative Changes
大体时间:At baseline CT image review
Interobserver agreement for grading facet joint degenerative changes on thoracolumbar CT scans using the 4-grade Pathria classification, assessed by Fleiss' kappa across six raters.
At baseline CT image review
Interobserver reliability of facet joint angulation measurements
大体时间:At baseline CT image review
Interobserver reliability of measurement of facet joint angulation in the axial plane on thoracolumbar CT scans, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
At baseline CT image review
Interobserver reliability of facet joint space width measurements
大体时间:At baseline CT image review
Interobserver reliability of quantitative measurement of mean facet joint space width assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
At baseline CT image review

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Intraobserver Reliability of CT-Based Pathria Grading Scale for Facet Joint Degenerative Changes
大体时间:At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver agreement for grading facet joint degenerative changes on thoracolumbar CT scans using the 4-grade Pathria classification, assessed on repeated review.
At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver reliability of facet joint angulation measurements
大体时间:At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver reliability of repeated measurement of facet joint angulation in the axial plane on thoracolumbar CT scans, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver reliability of facet joint space width measurements
大体时间:At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver reliability of repeated quantitative measurement of mean facet joint space width, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
At baseline and 1 month later

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年8月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年11月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月16日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月22日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月25日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月15日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月13日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅