Enhancing Voluntary Motion in Broad Patient Populations With Modular Powered Orthoses Renewal
研究概览
详细说明
The overall goal of this project is to develop modular, lower-limb, powered orthoses that fit to user-specific joints and control torque in a manner that enhances voluntary motion and mitigates musculoskeletal pain. Commercial exoskeletons typically use actuation and control methods that force the human user to follow specific, rigid gait patterns. This has prevented emerging wearable robotics from effectively addressing the weakness and pain associated with mild to moderate impairments, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). These populations require partial, task-agnostic assistance that works harmoniously with their voluntary motion rather than constraining it.
To bridge this gap, this project utilizes a quasi-direct drive actuation paradigm, a high-torque motor combined with a low-ratio transmission, integrated into conventional knee stabilizer and unloader braces. This hardware is uniquely capable of producing large output torques without causing perceptible resistance when backdriven by the human joint. To control the device across various activities of daily living (ADLs) without requiring pre-programmed trajectories, the investigators are developing a neural network-based formulation of "energy shaping" (effectively combining virtual springs, dampers, and gravity/inertia compensation) trained on multi-activity human data.
The specific objectives of this study period are to:
- Integrate the modular quasi-direct drive actuator and miniaturized electronics into both a modified knee stabilizer brace and a modified unloader knee brace.
- Implement and validate the neural network-based energy shaping controller to provide task-agnostic, biomimetic torque assistance with able-bodied subjects.
- Establish the clinical feasibility of this technology in individuals with multi-compartment knee OA.
The investigators hypothesize that the biomimetic torque assistance provided by these motorized braces will significantly reduce quadriceps effort, knee joint moment loads, and subjective pain across ADLs.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Emily Klinkman
- 电话号码：734-763-1156
- 邮箱：emilykk@umich.edu
研究联系人备份
- 姓名：Robert Gregg
- 电话号码：734-763-1156
- 邮箱：rdgregg@umich.edu
学习地点
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor、Michigan、美国、48109
- 招聘中
- Rehab Lab
-
接触：
- Emily Klinkman
- 电话号码：734-763-1156
- 邮箱：emilykk@umich.edu
-
首席研究员：
- Robert Gregg
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion criteria for able-bodied, young participants will be:
- Aged between 18 to 65 years
- Weigh less than 300 lbs (due to challenges in bracing heavier participants)
- BMI < 40 (due to challenges in bracing heavier participants)
Inclusion criteria for knee osteoarthritis participants will be:
- Aged between 30 to 85 years
- Medical diagnosis of patellofemoral and tibiofemoral osteoarthritis
- Patient reported pain ≥ 4 out of 10 during activities of daily life (to avoid floor effects)
- Weigh less than 300 lbs (due to challenges in bracing heavier participants)
- BMI < 40 (due to challenges in bracing heavier participants)
- Ability to walk 6 minutes without assistance from a person (may use walking aid)
- Ability to ascend/descend ramps and stairs with or without the use of handrails
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria for able-bodied, young adult participants will be:
- Pregnant (self-report)
- Any significant neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder that would interfere with the study
- Unable to walk for 20 minutes
- History of any cardiovascular, vestibular, or visual diseases and/or impairments that may interfere with the study
- Cognitive deficits that would impair their ability to give informed consent or impair their ability to follow simple instructions during the experiments. Cognitive deficits will be determined by a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of <22.
- Adults with a known allergy to medical grade tape
Exclusion criteria for knee osteoarthritis participants will be:
- Pregnant (self-report)
- Any recent lower-extremity fracture (within 6 months)
- Significant limitation on knee joint range of motion
- Significant neurological (e.g., stroke) or cardiovascular disorder that may affect the ability to walk
- Advised by a physician not to walk or exercise
- Uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes
- Use of opioids
- Cognitive deficits or visual impairment that would impair their ability to give informed consent or impair their ability to follow simple instructions during the experiments. Cognitive deficits will be determined by a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of <22.
- Adults with a known allergy to medical grade tape
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Exoskeleton
Experimental: Exoskeleton Participants in this arm of the study will perform various tasks while wearing the modular powered orthosis |
这项研究将调查模块化、下肢、动力矫形器，这些矫形器适合用户特定的弱化关节，并以增强广大患者群体自主运动的方式控制力/扭矩。
中心假设是，由能量目标控制的高扭矩、低惯性电机系统将使模块化动力矫形器能够部分辅助关节。
高扭矩电动机与最小传动装置相结合，可以通过人体关节自由旋转（即反向驱动），从而允许使用一种称为能量整形的新兴扭矩控制方法来减少任何运动过程中身体的感知重量/惯性。
通过将这些模块化执行器安装到商用矫形器上，临床医生可以轻松地开具/配置该技术。
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Muscle effort
大体时间：Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
Muscle activity will be measured by surface EMG electrodes, and EMG sites will be averaged by flexors and extensors.
For each condition (no orthosis vs. powered orthosis), signals will be normalized by their peaks during the no-orthosis condition, and then averaged over cycle, repetitions, and tasks to obtain overall muscle effort (focusing on knee extension for the powered knee orthosis, hip extension and flexion for the powered hip orthosis, and ankle plantarflexion for the powered ankle orthosis).
|
Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
|
Joint moment load
大体时间：Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
Biological torques will be estimated by subtracting the assistive torques from the total joint torques computed via inverse dynamics (using OpenSim).
Biological torques will be divided into flexion and extension.
For each condition (no orthosis vs. powered orthosis), signals will be normalized by their peaks during the no-orthosis condition, and then averaged over cycle, repetitions, and tasks to obtain overall joint moment load (focusing on knee extension for the powered knee orthosis, hip extension and flexion for the powered hip orthosis, and ankle plantarflexion for the powered ankle orthosis).
|
Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
|
Pain score
大体时间：Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) will be used to assess perceived pain for a multi-activity circuit test and isolated activity tests. The KOOS evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of knee injury. It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). It is an extension of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopaedic assessment scales and generic measures. |
Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
10-meter walk test
大体时间：Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
A 10-meter walk test on an overground walkway will assess self-selected walking speed across three conditions: no orthosis, conventional orthosis, and powered orthosis at their preferred assistance level.
|
Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
|
Joint range of motion
大体时间：Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
Joint range of motion for each task will be recorded using optical motion capture and averaged over cycle and repetitions.
Motion capture data will be recorded during study visits and used to calculate joint angle, which will then be averaged over gait cycles and activity repetitions to get a range of motion value.
|
Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
|
Joint compressive forces
大体时间：Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
In Aim 3, joint compressive forces for each task will be modeled using OpenSim / inverse dynamics and
|
Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
|
Difficulty score
大体时间：Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) will be used to assess perceived difficulty for a multi-activity circuit test and isolated activity tests. The KOOS evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of knee injury. It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). It is an extension of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopaedic assessment scales and generic measures. |
Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
|
QUEST
大体时间：Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
We will administer the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) survey after each orthosis condition to assess comfort and satisfaction with the device. The QUEST 2.0 is a highly-validated, 12-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure how satisfied a person is with a wide range of assistive technology. It contains 12 items divided into 2 primary categories: device subscale and services subscale. Participants rate each item using a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = Not satisfied at all, 2 = Not very satisfied, 3 = More or less satisfied, 4 = Quite satisfied, 5 = Very satisfied. To calculate the final metrics, the scores of the items are summed and divided by the total number of valid responses. This yields three separate scores ranging from 1.0 to 5.0: a Device Score, a Services Score, and a Total QUEST Score. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater satisfaction with the technology). |
Baseline and through study completion, an average of 2 months
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.