Efficacy of "DBT-LIVE", an Identity Skills Training Program, for Borderline Personality Disorder.
2026年7月2日 更新者：Isabel Fernández Felipe、Universidad Europea de Valencia
Efficacy of "DBT-LIVE", an Identity Skills Training Program, for Borderline Personality Disorder: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
The main objective of this project is to adapt and evaluate the LIVE Skill module in the Spanish population. LIVE Skill is a psychological intervention protocol specifically designed to address identity disturbances in individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). The project aims to examine its effectiveness in reducing identity disturbances, emotional regulation difficulties, and suicidal behavior, as well as in improving self-compassion, meaning in life, and personality functioning. In addition, the efficiency and feasibility of the program will be assessed by evaluating its acceptability among both patients and professionals, and its dissemination will be promoted to maximize its clinical impact.
The methodology includes a sample of approximately 112 individuals diagnosed with BPD, recruited through the Valencian Association for Personality Disorders (ASVA-TP), who will be allocated into two groups. The project is structured into five studies. First, a qualitative pilot feasibility study will be conducted with approximately 30 participants through focus groups and interviews in order to refine the intervention protocol. The second study will describe the randomized clinical trial protocol, including the interventions and assessment procedures. Subsequently, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be carried out, comparing LIVE Skill with treatment as usual (TAU), with assessments conducted at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and six-month follow-up. Following the trial, a qualitative evaluation will be undertaken to identify treatment facilitators and barriers. Finally, the psychometric validation of the questionnaires used in the study will be conducted.
The protocol will collect sociodemographic data and measures of identity, emotional regulation, self-compassion, meaning in life, suicidal ideation and behavior, personality functioning, as well as treatment acceptability and feasibility. Participants will provide informed consent and complete an initial assessment to confirm eligibility according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (估计的)
112
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Isabel Fernández Felipe
- 电话号码：+34 961 04 38 83
- 邮箱：isabel.fernandez@universidadeuropea.es
学习地点
-
-
Valencia
-
Valencia、Valencia、西班牙、46010
- Valencia
-
接触：
- Isabel Fernández Felipe
- 电话号码：+34 961 04 38 83
- 邮箱：isabel.fernandez@universidadeuropea.es
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
不
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being 16 years old or more.
- Having the diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder.
- Currently receiving treatment or follow-up care at the recruitment center mentioned above.
- Signing the informed consent form to participate in the study; in the case of minors, consent must be provided by parents or legal guardians.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals with severe conditions that may interfere with participation in the research-such as psychosis, schizophrenia, or intellectual disability.
- Individuals with high substance use who are not in optimal condition to follow the treatment program.
- Individuals who present an imminent risk of suicide or who are not in adequate psychological condition to participate in the program.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器：塔乌
照常治疗
|
照常治疗
|
|
实验性的：DBT LIVE
Identity disturbance skills based in DBT
|
Identity disturbance skills based on DBT
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-concept and Identity Measure (SCIM) (Kaufman et al., 2015)
大体时间：baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
It is a 27-item self-report instrument designed to evaluate identity consolidation and clinically significant identity disturbance.
The SCIM items were created to assess key components of identity, as well as the presence or absence of disturbances in these areas.
These components include: a) the continuity of self-concept and roles across different settings and interpersonal contexts, b) the consistency of personal values and interests, c) self-esteem, d) differentiation between oneself and others, and e) self-cohesion, understood as the feeling of being whole or complete.
Participants were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with 27 statements.
Responses were provided on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7 (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = somewhat disagree, 4 = neither agree nor disagree, 5 = somewhat agree, 6 = agree, and 7 = strongly agree).
Subscale scores were computed according to the direction of the construct being measured.
|
baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
|
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (Gratz & Roemer, 2004); Spanish validation of Hervás & Jódar (2008).
大体时间：baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
It adapted into Spanish by Hervás & Jódar (2008), comprises 28 items that assess difficulties in several domains of emotion regulation, including emotional non-acceptance, emotional neglect, everyday interference, emotional confusion, and emotional dyscontrol.
Responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = almost never; 5 = almost always), with higher scores indicating greater difficulties in emotion regulation.
The Spanish version demonstrated high internal consistency .93 and acceptable psychometric properties, as well as convergent and incremental validity in both cross-sectional (N = 254) and longitudinal (N = 60) samples.
This makes it a suitable and validated instrument for assessing difficulties in emotion regulation in Spanish-speaking adult populations.
|
baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-compassion Scale (SCS) (Neff, 2003); Spanish validation of García-Campayo et al. (2014).
大体时间：baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
Adapted into Spanish by García-Campayo et al. (2014), comprises 26 items (long form) designed to assess self-compassion across six components: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification.
Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = almost never; 5 = almost always), with higher values indicating greater self-compassion.
The Spanish version demonstrated good internal consistency .87 and adequate psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability and construct validity, supporting its use in Spanish-speaking populations.
The authors also validated a short form (12 items, SCS-SF), which showed .85 for the total score and acceptable subscale reliability, as well as stability over time and strong correlation with the full version.
|
baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
|
Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ) (Steger et al., 2006); Spanish validation of Marco et al. (2022).
大体时间：baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
In its Spanish version by Marco et al. (2022), measures two core dimensions of meaning in life: presence of meaning and search for meaning.
The MLQ is composed of 10 items (five per dimension), rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = false; 7 = true), with higher scores indicating greater presence or search of meaning.
In the Spanish adaptation, two-factor structure (Presence / Search) was confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis, with good internal consistency (Presence .86;
Search .87).
Test-retest reliability (one-month interval) was moderate (≈ .70 for Presence; ≈ .73 for Search), and the Spanish MLQ showed adequate convergent validity with measures of purpose, well-being, anxiety, and depression.
Therefore, the Spanish MLQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing meaning in life in adult Spanish samples.
|
baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
|
Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) (Linehan, 1981); Spanish validation of García-Nieto et al. (2013).
大体时间：baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
It's a brief self-report instrument consisting of 4 items, designed to assess past and current suicidal thoughts and behaviors, as well as the likelihood of future suicide.
In the Spanish adaptation, administered to a sample of 325 undergraduates, the SBQ-R showed good internal consistency .81 and temporal stability (test-retest ICC = .88).
A confirmatory factor analysis supported the construct's validity of the scale, and criterion-related validity was demonstrated via correlations with other psychological measures.
Thus, the Spanish SBQ-R appears to be a reliable and valid tool for identifying individuals - especially among young adults - at elevated risk of suicidal behavior.
|
baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
|
Level of Personal Functioning Scale (LPFS) (Bender et al., 2011); Spanish validation of Schetsche, (2021).
大体时间：baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
It was translated and adapted into Spanish by Schetsche (2021).
The Spanish LPFS-BF 2.0 retains the conceptual structure of the original, assessing personality functioning along two correlated domains: self-functioning and interpersonal functioning, and allowing for a general functioning score.
In the adaptation study (N = 361), confirmatory factor analysis supported a bifactorial structure (self-vs.
interpersonal functioning plus a general factor), internal consistency was found to be acceptable, and convergent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations with personality trait measures.
Therefore, the Spanish LPFS-BF 2.0 constitutes a valid and reliable instrument for assessing personality functioning in Spanish-speaking populations.
|
baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
|
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (Weiner et al., 2017).
大体时间：baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
It's a brief (4-item) self-report instrument designed to assess key implementation outcomes: perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of an intervention or implementation strategy.
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "completely disagree" to 5 = "completely agree," and higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility.
Psychometric evaluation demonstrated good internal consistency (α between .85 and .91 in the 4-item forms), structural validity (three-factor confirmatory factor analysis with acceptable fit: CFI ≈ 0.96, RMSEA ≈ 0.08), test-retest reliability (coefficients between .73 and .88 after ~7 weeks), known-groups validity, and sensitivity to change across time.
Given their brevity, general wording (not tied to specific contexts), and robust psychometric properties, these measures are suitable for use across diverse settings, stakeholder groups, and intervention types.
|
baseline; immediately after the intervention; 6 months
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
2027年1月1日
初级完成 (估计的)
2028年6月1日
研究完成 (估计的)
2028年12月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年6月22日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年7月2日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年7月6日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年7月6日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年7月2日
最后验证
2026年7月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.