Dietary Patterns Following a Firefighter Nutrition Education Programme (RESCUE)
Assessing Dietary Patterns and the Longer-term Impact of a Firefighter Nutrition Education Programme (RESCUE)
Firefighters may be at increased risk of poor dietary habits due to nature of shift work, extended duty periods, and reliance on food available within fire station environments. Irregular working patterns and limited access to healthy food options during shifts can contribute to poorer dietary intake. Previous research suggests that occupational environments and works schedules can significantly influence food choices and overall nutrition in emergency service personnel.
This study is being conducted to assess current dietary behaviours among firefighters and to evaluate changes following implementation of the RESCUE (Resilient Eating Strategies for Cancer-Risk in Uniformed Emergency workers) nutrition education programme, a structured programme designed to improve dietary knowledge and food choices. It will also explore the influence of station-based food provision on dietary intake.
The research is important as firefighters face increased occupational health risks, including elevated cancer risk, where diet may play a role in long-term health outcomes. Improving dietary habits in this group may improve health, occupational performance, and reduce the risk of chronic disease. The findings will provide evidence to inform the development of practical, targeted nutrition interventions within fire and rescue services.
研究概览
详细说明
Firefighters are exposed to a complex mixture of hazardous and carcinogenic substances through their work, including combustion products, diesel exhaust and contaminated fire effluent. Epidemiological evidence shows elevated risks for several cancers, and in 2022 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified occupational exposure in firefighting as carcinogenic (Group 1).
Risk is shaped not only by future exposure but by cumulative exposure over time, because some fire-related contaminants are persistent or bioaccumulative. Firefighters are also commonly exposed to shift work and circadian disruption, which has itself been associated with increased cancer risk. While improvements in personal protective equipment, decontamination practices, and operational procedures remain essential, evidence from exposure studies and biomonitoring research indicates that these measures alone cannot fully eliminate exposure-related risk, particularly for persistent and bioaccumulative contaminants.
There is therefore growing interest in additional, practical strategies that can support long-term health resilience in firefighters. Diet is one such area, with evidence linking dietary patterns to cancer-relevant processes such as inflammation, oxidative stress, xenobiotic metabolism, and DNA damage and repair; this evidence base is reflected in the guidance of major international cancer and public health organisations including the World Cancer Research Fund, World Health Organization, and International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Within the fire and rescue service, structured nutrition initiatives have historically been rare. Where dietary guidance exists, it usually mirrors general public health advice (healthy eating, weight and fitness) rather than firefighter-specific risks. This can limit engagement for those who already feel fit and for those uninspired by generic advice. In the context of dietary change for firefighter cancer-risk reduction, the limiting factor is often not lack of motivation, but the absence of education and a clear occupational rationale that connects everyday food choices to the specific risks of firefighting. Even if services are well informed regarding suitable dietary intake, dietary behaviours cannot be mandated or enforced within the workplace, and so suitable food choices relies on firefighters themselves.
This project addresses that gap by adopting a novel approach: explicitly framing dietary change around occupational cancer risk, aligned with the 2022 IARC classification. This approach is relevant to all firefighters, regardless of demographic factors, such as body composition or fitness level, and provides a clear basis for engagement. At present, there is little published data describing dietary patterns among UK firefighters, limiting the ability of services to design targeted, evidence-informed interventions.
The RESCUE programme is designed to be practical, culturally appropriate and scalable within real fire service settings. It centres on structured, firefighter-specific education delivered at watch level and reinforced with resources that translate evidence into actionable guidance within existing station "mess" culture. The approach does not rely on individual prescriptions or supplements.
The approach is informed by recent peer-reviewed work synthesising evidence on diet, firefighting exposures and cancer risk, co-authored by the principal investigator in collaboration with Dr Shelly Coe (Oxford Brookes University), which highlighted consistent evidence linking dietary patterns to cancer risk, supported by plausible underlying biological mechanisms, alongside the absence of practical firefighter-specific dietary frameworks. This project builds on that foundation by moving from evidence synthesis to real-world implementation and evaluation.
The project aligns with the objects of the Fire Service Research and Training Trust by supporting research into the prevention of fire and rescue service-related health risks and by contributing to the training of fire and rescue personnel through structured education and transferable resources. By focusing on practical, scalable dietary change, the project also addresses well-recognised determinants of workforce health and operational resilience, supporting a more stable and effective fire and rescue service while maintaining its primary focus on occupational cancer risk.
RESCUE is a service-wide nutrition education programme implemented across Avon Fire & Rescue Service independently of participation in the research evaluation. The observational evaluation comprises voluntary repeated cross-sectional questionnaire assessments among eligible wholetime operational firefighters before programme implementation and approximately 3, 6 and 12 months afterwards. Participation is invited separately at each assessment, and respondents are not required to have completed a previous questionnaire; the responding samples may therefore differ between assessment points. Participant-generated study codes permit linked longitudinal analyses where responses can be matched across assessments.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Ben R Jones, BSc (Hons)
- 电话号码:07867555602
- 邮箱:ben1jones@hotmail.com
研究联系人备份
- 姓名:Shelly A Coe, PhD
- 电话号码:07531435736
- 邮箱:scoe@brookes.ac.uk
学习地点
-
-
-
Bristol、英国、BS20 8JJ
- 招聘中
- Avon Fire and Rescue Service
-
接触:
- Ben R Jones, BSc (Hons)
- 电话号码:+ 44 7867555602
- 邮箱:ben1jones@hotmail.com
-
首席研究员:
- Ben R Jones, BSc
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Wholetime (full-time) operational firefighters employed by Avon Fire & Rescue Service.
Aged 18 years or over. Able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Individuals who are not full-time operational firefighters within Avon Fire and Rescue service (e.g. administrative staff, support roles, or part-time on-call firefighters, firefighters from other fire services)
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
Eligible AF&RS Wholetime Operational Firefighters
Wholetime operational firefighters employed by Avon Fire & Rescue Service who voluntarily complete one or more RESCUE evaluation questionnaires.
Participation is invited separately at each assessment, and respondents are not required to have completed a previous questionnaire.
RESCUE was implemented service-wide independently of participation in the research evaluation.
|
A firefighter-specific nutrition education programme implemented across Avon Fire & Rescue Service at watch level as a service-wide workforce initiative, independently of participation in the research evaluation.
The programme provides education on dietary strategies relevant to long-term health and cancer-risk reduction, supported by educational resources designed to encourage healthier dietary choices at home and within the workplace.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Mean RESCUE Protective Eating Pattern Score Between Baseline and 12 Months
大体时间:Baseline before programme implementation and approximately 12 months after programme implementation
|
Difference in mean RESCUE Protective Eating Pattern Score between the service-wide baseline and 12-month questionnaire assessments following implementation of the RESCUE nutrition programme. The score measures the reported frequency of protective dietary behaviours, including consumption of fruit, vegetables, cruciferous and allium vegetables, legumes, wholegrains, nuts and seeds, and fish and seafood. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more frequent reported consumption of the protective foods represented in the score. The primary comparison will include all respondents with valid scores in the baseline sample and all respondents with valid scores in the 12-month sample; completion of both assessments is not required. Where participant-generated study codes permit baseline and 12-month responses to be linked, within-participant change will also be examined as a supporting analysis. |
Baseline before programme implementation and approximately 12 months after programme implementation
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant-reported appraisal of the RESCUE nutrition programme
大体时间:Approximately 12 months after programme implementation
|
Among respondents who report having engaged with at least one component of RESCUE, six investigator-developed items assess the programme's understandability, relevance to firefighters, practicality for station life and shift work, perceived educational benefit, and support for continued provision.
Responses are recorded on a five-point agreement scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree and summarised for each item.
Together, these item-level findings will provide a descriptive assessment of programme appraisal and perceived educational benefit at approximately 12 months.
|
Approximately 12 months after programme implementation
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in workplace messing practices (RESCUE Messing Questionnaire Score)
大体时间:Baseline before programme implementation and approximately 12 months after programme implementation
|
Change in workplace food provision and station messing practices, assessed using the RESCUE Messing Questionnaire completed by watches at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months.
The questionnaire assesses the frequency of healthier food provision during station meal preparation, including vegetables, legumes, wholegrains, cooking fats and oils, and protein choices.
Questionnaire responses will be combined to produce a RESCUE Messing Questionnaire Score, ranging from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating healthier workplace food provision and messing practices.
|
Baseline before programme implementation and approximately 12 months after programme implementation
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.