此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Visual Stimulus-Based Cognitive-Motor Agility Exercise in Older Adults

2026年7月18日 更新者:Gulsah Sahin、Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

Effects of Visual Stimulus-Based Cognitive-Motor Agility Exercise on Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Functional Performance in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of adding a brief visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercise component to a multicomponent exercise program in community-dwelling older adults. Participants were randomized to either an experimental group or an active control group. Both groups participated in supervised multicomponent exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Each session lasted 45 minutes. During the final 10 minutes of each session, the experimental group performed the visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercises, whereas the active control group performed time-matched low-intensity activities. The primary outcome was global cognitive performance assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Secondary outcomes included hand and foot visual-motor response time, visual working memory, and functional performance.

研究概览

详细说明

This study was designed as an 8-week, parallel-group randomized controlled exercise intervention in community-dwelling older adults. The study aimed to determine whether adding a brief Light Trainer-assisted visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercise component to a multicomponent exercise program would provide additional benefits for cognitive, psychomotor, and functional performance.

After completion of baseline assessments, eligible participants were randomized to either an experimental group or an active control group. Both groups participated in supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks, for a total of 16 sessions. Each session lasted 45 minutes. The first 35 minutes of each session consisted of the same multicomponent exercise program in both groups. This program included light-paced walking, mobility exercises, multidirectional stepping, balance tasks, agility exercise, coordination exercises, low-resistance strengthening exercises, and functional movement combinations.

During the final 10 minutes of each session, participants in the experimental group completed visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercises using the Light Trainer system. These tasks required participants to perceive randomized visual stimuli, select an appropriate motor response, and respond as quickly and accurately as possible using hand or foot movements. The Light Trainer component included 13 repetitions of 30-second task intervals separated by 15-second rest periods. Task difficulty progressed across the 8-week intervention by increasing the number of modules from two to six and by increasing task complexity, stimulus randomness, movement direction changes, response speed requirements, and cognitive-motor demands.

Participants in the active control group completed the same 35-minute multicomponent exercise program followed by a time-matched 10-minute low-intensity activity period. These activities included supervised stretching, mobility, agility, balance, or recovery exercises and did not include visual stimulus-based response tasks, rapid decision-making, reactive agility tasks, or Light Trainer-assisted exercises.

Assessments were performed at baseline and after the 8-week intervention period. The primary outcome was global cognitive performance assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Secondary outcomes included hand and foot visual-motor response time, visual working memory performance time and accuracy, Ten-Step Test, 30-second Chair Stand Test, 30-second Arm Curl Test, and 8-Foot Up-and-Go Test. The study was conducted in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older who were able to ambulate independently and follow basic exercise and testing instructions.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

41

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older
  • Able to ambulate independently
  • Able to understand and follow basic exercise and testing instructions
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 23 or higher
  • No health condition that would limit safe participation in exercise
  • Able to participate regularly in the 8-week exercise program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious cardiovascular, neurological, orthopedic, or vestibular disease that could prevent safe participation in exercise
  • Recent surgery
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Severe visual or hearing problems
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment score below 23
  • Use of medications known to substantially affect cognitive, psychomotor, balance, or motor performance
  • Very low physical function preventing safe participation in the exercise program

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Visual stimuli Cognitive-Motor Agility Exercise
Participants in this arm completed supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Each 45-minute session included the same 35-minute multicomponent exercise program performed by both groups, followed by 10 minutes of Light Trainer-assisted visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercise. The Light Trainer component included reactive visual-motor tasks requiring participants to respond to randomized visual stimuli using hand and foot movements.
Participants completed a supervised 35-minute multicomponent exercise program twice weekly for 8 weeks. The program included light-paced walking, mobility exercises, multidirectional stepping, balance tasks, coordination exercises, low-resistance strengthening exercises, and functional movement combinations. This component was performed by both the experimental and active control groups.
The experimental group completed a 10-minute Light Trainer-assisted visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercise component during the final part of each supervised session. Tasks required participants to perceive randomized visual stimuli, select an appropriate motor response, and respond as quickly and accurately as possible using hand or foot movements. Each session included 13 repetitions of 30-second task intervals separated by 15-second rest periods. Task difficulty progressed across 8 weeks by increasing the number of modules from two to six and increasing task complexity.
有源比较器:Active Control: Multicomponent Exercise With Low-Intensity Activities
Participants in this arm completed supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Each 45-minute session included the same 35-minute multicomponent exercise program performed by the experimental group, followed by 10 minutes of time-matched low-intensity activities. These activities included supervised stretching, mobility, balance, or recovery exercises and did not include visual stimulus-based response tasks, rapid decision-making, reactive agility tasks, or Light Trainer-assisted exercises.
Participants completed a supervised 35-minute multicomponent exercise program twice weekly for 8 weeks. The program included light-paced walking, mobility exercises, multidirectional stepping, balance tasks, coordination exercises, low-resistance strengthening exercises, and functional movement combinations. This component was performed by both the experimental and active control groups.
The active control group completed a 10-minute time-matched low-intensity activity period during the final part of each supervised session. These activities included stretching, mobility, balance, or recovery exercises and did not include visual stimulus-based response tasks, rapid decision-making, reactive agility tasks, or Light Trainer-assisted exercises.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score
大体时间:Baseline and 8 weeks
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was used to assess global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Change from baseline to 8 weeks was evaluated. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was used to assess global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Change from baseline to 8 weeks was evaluated.
Baseline and 8 weeks

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Ten-Step Test Time
大体时间:Baseline and after 8 weeks
Lower-extremity rapid stepping and agility performance were assessed using the Ten-Step Test. Participants completed 10 alternating stepping movements on a 10-cm step block as quickly as possible. Test duration was recorded in seconds. Shorter time indicates better performance.
Baseline and after 8 weeks
Change in Hand Visual-Motor Response Time
大体时间:Baseline and 8 weeks
Hand visual-motor response performance was assessed using the Light Trainer system. Participants responded to randomized visual stimuli by touching illuminated modules with either hand during a 30-second task. Fastest and mean response times were recorded in seconds. Shorter response times indicate better performance.
Baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Foot Visual-Motor Response Time
大体时间:Baseline and 8 weeks
Foot visual-motor response performance was assessed using the Light Trainer system. Participants responded to randomized visual stimuli by stepping on illuminated modules with either foot during a 30-second task. Fastest and mean response times were recorded in seconds. Shorter response times indicate better performance.
Baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Visual Working Memory Performance Time
大体时间:Baseline and 8 weeks
Visual working memory response time was assessed using the memory mode of the Light Trainer system. Participants memorized the color and position of illuminated modules and then identified the module corresponding to a target color. Fastest times were recorded in seconds, with shorter values indicating better visual working memory performance. Change from baseline to 8 weeks was evaluated.
Baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Visual Working Memory Accuracy
大体时间:Baseline and 8 weeks
Visual working memory accuracy was assessed using the memory mode of the Light Trainer system. Participants memorized the color and position of illuminated modules and then identified the module corresponding to a target color. Accuracy was expressed as the device-recorded percentage of correct responses across all trials and ranged from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating better visual working memory performance. Change from baseline to 8 weeks was evaluated.
Baseline and 8 weeks
Change in 30-Second Chair Stand Test Performance
大体时间:Baseline and 8 weeks
Lower-body functional strength was assessed using the 30-second Chair Stand Test. Participants were instructed to stand up fully and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds. The total number of correctly completed repetitions was recorded. Higher repetition count indicates better performance.
Baseline and 8 weeks
Change in 30-Second Arm Curl Test Performance
大体时间:Baseline and 8 weeks
Upper-body functional strength was assessed using the 30-second Arm Curl Test. Participants performed as many controlled elbow flexion-extension repetitions as possible within 30 seconds while seated. The test was performed separately for the right and left arms. Higher repetition count indicates better performance.
Baseline and 8 weeks
Change in 8-Foot Up-and-Go Test Time
大体时间:Baseline and 8 weeks
Functional mobility, agility, and dynamic balance were assessed using the 8-Foot Up-and-Go Test. Participants rose from a chair, walked around a marker placed 2.44 meters away, returned to the chair, and sat down again. Test duration was recorded in seconds. Shorter time indicates better performance.
Baseline and 8 weeks

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年4月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年6月8日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年6月8日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月15日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月15日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月20日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月21日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月18日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • 2026-YONP-0051

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅